<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1414-3283</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Interface (Botucatu)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1414-3283</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UNESP]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1414-32832010000100021</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The narrow entrance door of Brazil's national health system (SUS): an evaluation of accessibility in the family health strategy]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[A estreita porta de entrada do sistema único de saúde (SUS): uma avaliação do acesso na estratégia de saúde da família]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[La estrecha puerta de entrada del sistema único de salud (SUS): una valoración del acceso en la estrategia de salud de la familia (ESF)]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Azevedo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana Lucia Martins de]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[André Monteiro]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A">
<institution><![CDATA[,  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>se</numero>
<fpage>0</fpage>
<lpage>0</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1414-32832010000100021&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1414-32832010000100021&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1414-32832010000100021&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[This study has the purpose of analyzing users' perception of the accessibility to Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF - Family Health Strategy) in its geographical, organizational, socio-cultural and economic dimensions. Process evaluation with qualitative approach through open interview, direct observation and documental analysis was performed in the city of Recife, northeastern Brazil. The main problems were: the deficient referral and counter-referral system; delayed return of laboratory test results; excessive number of families per team; difficulties in scheduling medical consultations; expenditures on medicines. Facilities were observed in the professional-user relationship, as well as in the geographical proximity of the health unit. ESF proved to be a narrow entrance door to Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS - Brazil's National Health System). Therefore, it deserves to be evaluated with a more critical look that takes into account, as a starting point, the needs of individuals who request its actions, as well as the reasoning which guides the actions of the subjects involved in care.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Este estudo objetivou analisar a percepção dos usuários sobre o acesso à Estratégia de Saúde da Família (ESF) em suas dimensões geográfica, organizacional, sóciocultural e econômica. Fez-se uma avaliação de processo com abordagem qualitativa por meio de entrevista aberta, observação direta e análise documental, em Recife, Pernambuco. Os principais problemas foram: deficiente sistema de referência e contra-referência; demora no retorno dos resultados dos exames laboratoriais; excessivo número de famílias por equipe; dificuldades para marcar consultas; despesas com medicamentos. Foram observadas facilidades na relação profissional-usuário, bem como na proximidade geográfica da unidade de saúde. A ESF revelou-se uma estreita porta de entrada do SUS, merecendo um olhar distinto, que adote como ponto de partida as necessidades dos indivíduos demandatários de suas ações, bem como as lógicas que norteiam as ações dos sujeitos envolvidos no cuidado.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Este estudio tiene por objeto enfoca el de analizar la percepción de los usuarios sobre el acceso en la ESF en sus dimensiones geográfica, de organización, socio-cultural y económica. Se ha valorado del proceso con planteamiento cualitativo por medio de entrevista abierta, observación directa y análisis documental en la ciudad de Recife, del estado brasileño de Pernambuco. Los principales problemas han sido: deficiente sistema de referencia, demora en el retorno de los resultados de los exámenes de laboratorio, excesivo número de familias por equipo, dificultad de establecer consultas, gastos con medicamentos. Se han observado facilidades en la relación profesional-usuario así como en la aproximación geográfica de la unidad de salud. La ESF se ha revelado una estrecha puerta de entrada del SUS que merece una observación distinta que adopte como punto de partida las necesidades de los individuos demandantes de sus acciones y también las lógicas que orientan las acciones de los sujetos involucrados en el cuidado.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[National Health System (SUS)]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Healthcare quality, acess, and evaluation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Family Health Strategy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[User satisfaction]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Primary healthcare]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS)]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Acesso e avaliação da qualidade da assistência à saúde]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Estratégia de Saúde da Família]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Satisfação do usuário]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Atenção primária à saúde]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Sistema Único de Salud (SUS)]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Calidad de la atención de salud, acesso y evaluación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Estrategia de Salud de la Familia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Satisfacción del usuario]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Atención primaria de salud]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p><font size="4" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"><b>The narrow   entrance door of <strong>B</strong>razil's national health system (SUS): an evaluation of   accessibility in the family health strategy<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><b><sup>1</sup></b></a></b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <font size="3" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"><b>A estreita porta de entrada do sistema &uacute;nico de   sa&uacute;de (SUS): uma avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o do acesso na estrat&eacute;gia de sa&uacute;de da fam&iacute;lia</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"><b>La estrecha puerta de   entrada del Sistema &Uacute;nico de Salud (SUS): una valoraci&oacute;n del acceso en la Estrategia de Salud de la Familia (ESF)</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Ana Lucia Martins de Azevedo<sup>I,<a href="#_edn1" name="_ednref1"><b>i</b></a></sup>;   Andr&eacute; Monteiro Costa<sup>II</sup></b></p>     <p><sup>I</sup>Public Ministry of Pernambuco. Av. Santos Dumont, 508, apto. 403. Aflitos, Recife, PE,   Brasil. 52.050-050. &lt;<a href="mailto:anazevedo.pe@gmail.com">anazevedo.pe@gmail.com</a>&gt;    <br>   <sup>II</sup>Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalh&atilde;es,   Funda&ccedil;&atilde;o Oswaldo Cruz (CPqAM/Fiocruz)</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Translated   by Carolina Siqueira Muniz Ventura    <br>   Translation   from <a href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-32832010000400007&lng=pt&nrm=iso" target="_blank"><b>Interface - Comunica&ccedil;&atilde;o, Sa&uacute;de, Educa&ccedil;&atilde;o</b>, Botucatu, v.14,     n.35, p. 797-810, Dez. 2010</a>.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <hr size="1" noshade> </p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></font></p> </font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">This study has the purpose of analyzing users'    perception of the accessibility to <em>Estrat&eacute;gia Sa&uacute;de da Fam&iacute;lia</em> (ESF - Family Health Strategy) in its geographical, organizational,   socio-cultural    and economic dimensions. Process evaluation with   qualitative approach through    open interview, direct observation and   documental analysis was performed in    the city of Recife, northeastern   Brazil. The main problems were: the deficient    referral and   counter-referral system; delayed return of laboratory test results;      excessive number of families per team; difficulties in scheduling   medical consultations;    expenditures on medicines. Facilities were   observed in the professional-user    relationship, as well as in the   geographical proximity of the health unit. ESF    proved to be a narrow   entrance door to <em>Sistema &Uacute;nico de Sa&uacute;de</em> (SUS - Brazil's   National Health System). Therefore, it deserves to be evaluated    with a   more critical look that takes into account, as a starting point, the      needs of individuals who request its actions, as well as the reasoning   which    guides the actions of the subjects involved in care.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"><strong>Keywords:</strong> National Health System (SUS).    Healthcare quality, acess, and   evaluation. Family Health Strategy. User satisfaction.    Primary   healthcare.</font></p> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"> <hr size="1" noshade></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"><strong>RESUMO</strong></font></p> </font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">Este   estudo objetivou analisar a percep&ccedil;&atilde;o    dos usu&aacute;rios sobre o acesso &agrave;   Estrat&eacute;gia de Sa&uacute;de    da Fam&iacute;lia (ESF) em suas dimens&otilde;es geogr&aacute;fica,   organizacional,    s&oacute;ciocultural e econ&ocirc;mica. Fez-se uma avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o de      processo com abordagem qualitativa por meio de entrevista aberta,   observa&ccedil;&atilde;o    direta e an&aacute;lise documental, em Recife, Pernambuco. Os   principais problemas    foram: deficiente sistema de refer&ecirc;ncia e   contra-refer&ecirc;ncia; demora    no retorno dos resultados dos exames   laboratoriais; excessivo n&uacute;mero    de fam&iacute;lias por equipe; dificuldades   para marcar consultas; despesas    com medicamentos. Foram observadas   facilidades na rela&ccedil;&atilde;o profissional-usu&aacute;rio,    bem como na proximidade   geogr&aacute;fica da unidade de sa&uacute;de. A ESF    revelou-se uma estreita porta   de entrada do SUS, merecendo um olhar distinto,    que adote como ponto   de partida as necessidades dos indiv&iacute;duos demandat&aacute;rios    de suas   a&ccedil;&otilde;es, bem como as l&oacute;gicas que norteiam as a&ccedil;&otilde;es    dos sujeitos   envolvidos no cuidado.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"><strong>Palavras-chave:</strong> Sistema &Uacute;nico de    Sa&uacute;de (SUS). Acesso e avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o da qualidade da   assist&ecirc;ncia    &agrave; sa&uacute;de. Estrat&eacute;gia de Sa&uacute;de da Fam&iacute;lia.    Satisfa&ccedil;&atilde;o do   usu&aacute;rio. Aten&ccedil;&atilde;o prim&aacute;ria    &agrave; sa&uacute;de.</font></p> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"> <hr size="1" noshade></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><strong>RESUMEN</strong></p>     <p>Este   estudio tiene por objeto enfoca el de analizar    la percepci&oacute;n de los   usuarios sobre el acceso en la ESF en sus dimensiones    geogr&aacute;fica, de   organizaci&oacute;n, socio-cultural y econ&oacute;mica.    Se ha valorado del proceso   con planteamiento cualitativo por medio de entrevista    abierta,   observaci&oacute;n directa y an&aacute;lisis documental en la ciudad    de Recife, del   estado brasile&ntilde;o de Pernambuco. Los principales problemas    han sido:   deficiente sistema de referencia, demora en el retorno de los resultados      de los ex&aacute;menes de laboratorio, excesivo n&uacute;mero de familias por      equipo, dificultad de establecer consultas, gastos con medicamentos. Se   han    observado facilidades en la relaci&oacute;n profesional-usuario as&iacute; como      en la aproximaci&oacute;n geogr&aacute;fica de la unidad de salud. La ESF se    ha   revelado una estrecha puerta de entrada del SUS que merece una   observaci&oacute;n    distinta que adopte como punto de partida las necesidades   de los individuos    demandantes de sus acciones y tambi&eacute;n las l&oacute;gicas   que orientan    las acciones de los sujetos involucrados en el cuidado.</p>     <p><strong>Palabras clave:</strong> Sistema &Uacute;nico de    Salud (SUS). Calidad de la atenci&oacute;n de salud,   acesso y evaluaci&oacute;n.    Estrategia de Salud de la Familia. Satisfacci&oacute;n   del usuario. Atenci&oacute;n    primaria de salud.</p> <hr size="1" noshade>  <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>INTRODUCTION</b></p>     <p><i>Sistema   &Uacute;nico de Sa&uacute;de</i> (SUS - Brazil's National Health System) has   extended the accessibility to primary healthcare by means of <i>Estrat&eacute;gia de     Sa&uacute;de da Fam&iacute;lia</i> (ESF - Family Health Strategy), which was created in 1994<a href="#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2"><sup>2</sup></a> and has been growing significantly since then. In 2007, ESF reached more than   90% of the Brazilian municipalities and covered approximately 87 million   inhabitants (46%), with 27 thousand installed teams (Giovanella,   Mendon&ccedil;a, 2008). Such expansion has become fundamental to guarantee   accessibility through primary healthcare (Brasil, 2006), which has assumed the   function of entrance door to SUS.</p>     <p>However,   this idea of "entrance door", present in the Brazilian health system, is,   according to Merhy and Queiroz (1993) and Cec&iacute;lio (1997), inconsistent with a   model that intends to fully fulfill the integrality of individual and   collective actions. Friedrich and Pierantoni (2006) share this opinion, as they   argue that the way in which the production process of the ESF teams is   organized presents serious contradictions between the purpose of this strategy   and users' demand. To these authors, ESF is predominantly developed in a "divided,   fragmented and isolated" way, compromising the main meaning of "entrance door",   which is the integral access to the health system.</p>     <p>As the   object of analysis in the present paper, the access<a href="#_ftn3" name="_ftnref3"><sup>3</sup></a> assumed here is based on the understanding that the existence of a service in a   certain place, although being an important aspect, does not guarantee its   effective utilization (Viera da Silva, 2005). Therefore, when we examine the   subjects' discourse, their way of viewing and experiencing the access to the   health services that they need, we will probably find that the population   builds its own concepts and access strategies, and that it reacts in the   countless times it is induced to accept certain health system organization   models in whose creation it did not participate. In this aspect, access should   be analyzed in light of a power relation, according to Foucault's (1979) sense,   which involves diverse interests and "hidden agendas which are not always   immediately revealed"<a href="#_ftn4" name="_ftnref4"><sup>4</sup></a> (Cec&iacute;lio, 2002, p.295).</p>     <p>The   analysis of access has been part of the agenda of many health policy   researchers, even when this is not the central theme. In a study about the   quality of healthcare developed in the primary healthcare network of Natal (Northeastern Brazil), Dimenstein et al. (2003) observed that access constituted a   difficulty. More recently, Elias et al. (2006), comparing PSF and the UBS (<i>Unidades     B&aacute;sicas de Sa&uacute;de</i> - Primary Healthcare Units) in the city of S&atilde;o Paulo based   on the evaluation of users, managers and professionals, identified that   accessibility was considered the worst dimension of primary care in the two   models.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>To Fekete   (1996, p.116), accessibility can be an interesting axis of analysis in evaluation   processes because it favors the "apprehension of the relation that exists   between the population's needs and aspirations in terms of ‘health actions' and   the supply of resources to meet them". This perspective - access related   fundamentally to individuals' needs - suggests that difficulties in the   utilization of the health services have a substantial value (Viera da Silva,   2005).</p>     <p>Viewed in   this way, the concept of access is deeply connected with the principle of   integrality with which Mattos (2001) and Cec&iacute;lio (1997) work in the field of   health. Integrality consists of abolishing reductionisms in care, and is   expressed in the concretization of the "universal right to receive assistance   in case of health needs". That is, the individual's right to have access   (without any type of impediment) to all the technologies that the system offers   to meet his needs (Mattos, 2001, p.63).</p>     <p>In this   sense, the individuals' experience of access in the direct or indirect contact   with the health services tells a lot about the system's capacity to correspond   to their expectations and needs, and to ensure a human and social right - the   right to having health - which, in the scope of the public policies, should   reflect respect for the multiple singularities that compose the complex demand   of the user population. It is in this perspective that Bobbio (2004, p.65)   understands social rights. According to him, as regards social rights, "individuals   are equal only generically, but not specifically". This can be considered the   reason why the approach to access does not take the whole for the sum of its   parts; rather, it considers that the whole is multidimensional and inseparable,   fed back and re-codified in the objective and subjective daily routine of the   human experiences.</p>     <p>In this   line of thought, operationalizing the concept of access to the health services   implies considering the relationship that is established between the   individuals and the health system, in a context of complex needs and of answers   which, in the majority of times, are limited.</p>     <p>It is from   this perspective that Donabedian (1984) defines access as the degree of   adjustment between the characteristics of the health resources and those of the   population, in the process of searching for and obtaining health assistance.   This view is shared by Starfield (2002), to whom access is the first   requirement so that primary healthcare truly becomes the entrance door to the   health system; it is necessary to eliminate financial, geographical,   organizational and cultural barriers.</p>     <p>Also based   on this conception, Fekete (1996) identifies four dimensions of accessibility:   i) the <i>geographical dimension</i> refers to physical aspects that impede the   access (rivers, large avenues); distance between the population and the   resources. ii) The <i>organizational dimension</i> refers to obstacles   originated in the mode of service organization: a) in the entrance: - delay to   schedule the medical consultation, type of scheduling, scheduled time of the   medical consultation; b) after the entrance - waiting long to receive medical   assistance; continuity of care, which is related to mechanisms of referral and   counter-referral. iii) The <i>sociocultural dimension</i> refers to the   population's perspectives: individual's perception of the severity of his   illness, fear of the diagnosis and interventions, beliefs and habits, shame;   and to the health system's perspectives: professionals' education; the teams'   lack of preparation to assist patients with distinct sociocultural   characteristics; incipience of the participation processes. iv) The <i>economic</i> <i>dimension</i> refers to the consumption of time, energy and financial   resources to search for and receive assistance; losses caused by being absent   from work during days; cost of treatment.</p>     <p>The   expansion of the primary healthcare's coverage enabled by the ESF has been   amazing and its enrolled population is likely to coincide soon with the entire   needy population of Brazil. In Recife (Northeastern Brazil), from 2000 to 2007,   the number of teams increased by 730%, which enabled a leap in the population's   coverage, from 6.5% in 2000 to 51% in 2007 (Recife, 2008).</p>     <p>However,   the supply of these services seems not to meet users' needs, as the access is   not integral, limiting, in practice, the objectives of the ESF, as was   explained above. This was the hypothesis that was raised to answer the question   that guided this study: does the ESF enable (integral) access to the enrolled   population? Thus, the general objective of this study was to evaluate the   access to ESF based on users' perception.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"><b>Methodology</b></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>This   research consists of a qualitative evaluation of the access to the ESF in a   locality of Recife, state of Pernambuco, focusing on the process, understood as   "a series of activities performed by and between professionals and patients   (Donabedian, 1984, p.95).</p>     <p>The   qualitative approach, according to Chizzoti (2005), understands that knowledge   is not merely a set of isolated data that are sewn by some theory that explains   them. As an integral part of the knowledge process, the subject-observer assumes   an interpretative posture towards phenomena, to which this same subject   attributes meanings.</p>     <p>Regarding   the area of study, it was carried out in the municipality of Recife, in the   territory corresponding to Sanitary District IV, where there are 39 Family   Health Teams that cover 37,916 families (136,500 people, totaling 49% of the   District's population).</p>     <p>Data   collection instruments were: interview (with semi-structured script and open   questions), direct observation and documental analysis. The script used for   observation and documental analysis consisted of the sub-items of each category   of analysis, which served as a guide to the notes, among them: form of   receptiveness, time, user-professional bond, supply and demand of services and   inputs, unit's functioning and organization, availability of medicines, and   mechanisms of referral and counter-referral.</p>     <p>As for the   sample, in a qualitative research, the definition criterion is not numerical.   Rather, what matters is to look at the phenomena from many points-of-view and   observation perspectives, always taking into account the principle of   saturation of the theme (Minayo, 1999). Thus, we used a random sample of 24   subjects older than 15 years, users of two Family Health teams, selected among   the population enrolled in the catchment area of the two teams by means of File-A   (user enrolment file). With the support of the <i>agentes comunit&aacute;rios de sa&uacute;de</i> (ACS - community health agents), the individuals were identified and contacted at   their own residences (where the interviews also took place), but only those who   voluntarily adhered to the research participated, after having read and signed   a consent document. All of the subjects were informed of the objectives of the   research and of the content of the consent document before they signed it. The   interviews were recorded with the participants' permission.</p>     <p>The   subjects were selected according to the life cycle: eight youths, eight adults   and eight elderly individuals, with the following characteristics: 18 were ESF attenders   - 12 women and 6 men - and six were non-attenders, whose sex varied according   to the draw. The option for this numerical difference was based on the   proportionality in the demand and utilization of the health services, in which   the proportion of women and users is known to be higher than that of men and   non-attenders. </p>     <p>We decided   to listen to some professionals (a total of eight) and the manager (director of   the Sanitary District), which allowed to draw some contrasts and comparisons,   as well as expanded the universe of reflections. The interviewed professionals   were four from each of the two drawn teams: the doctor, the nurse, the dentist   and one ACS. All of them accepted to participate in the research (they signed   the consent document) and were interviewed at their respective healthcare   units.</p>     <p>The   interviews were performed from August to December 2006. The direct observation   was carried out at the two <i>unidades de sa&uacute;de da fam&iacute;lia</i> (USF - family   health units), during the months of November and December 2006, and the   documental analysis was performed during the year of 2006. Seven systematic   visits were made to the units, distributed in the two periods of functioning   (morning and afternoon).</p>     <p>The   categories of analysis that constitute the access dimensions are: geographical,   organizational (obstacles in the entrance and after it), sociocultural and   economic, and have already been detailed above. Such categories were based on   the systematization proposed by Fekete (1996) and on the conceptual   contributions of Donabedian (1984) and Starfield (2002).</p>     <p>For data   analysis, Content Analysis (Bardin, 2004) was used. All the discursive material   and the field records were treated and analyzed according to the adopted   categories and to the values attributed to the meaning nuclei.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"><b>Results and   discussion</b></font></p>     <p><b>The geographical dimension of access</b></p>     <p>It is   widely known that barriers related to distance are associated with the services'   level of complexity: the less specialized they are, the nearer to the   population they are located, and the inverse is also true. Access in this   dimension was not criticized by users, which was already expected, as the   healthcare units under focus are located in the territory where the enrolled   families live. Probable barriers in the route (such as open grooves and   unfinished or unleveled sidewalks) were not mentioned as limiting factors, even   when the interviewee was an elderly person with visible locomotion   difficulties. Thus, regarding the distance to arrive at the health unit, the   following fragment summarizes how users classified it:</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"It is     near here, I go there on foot". <b>(user 8, male adult, attender, team A)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"><b>Organizational   dimension</b></font></p>     <p><b>Obstacles in the entrance</b></p>     <p>One of the   reasons why some users did not attend the unit and, consequently, did not use   the team's services, was the</p> </font>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"difficulty     in scheduling the medical consultation [...]". <b>(user 10, female adult,       non-attender, team B)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>This   difficulty remains an important access problem in primary healthcare, as Ara&uacute;jo   et al. (2008) have demonstrated, constituting, still today, a challenge to SUS.   In spite of recognized achievements in this sense - in view of studies that   show the significant increase in primary healthcare coverage (S&aacute;, 2002), and   the advance towards equity (Facchini, 2006; Piccini et al., 2006; Travassos et   al., 2000) -, there still are, as we can see, situations in which users do not find space to meet their needs in moments of pain and acute suffering.</p>     <p>The   difficulty in scheduling a consultation has also been attested by the professionals'   discourse, as we can see below.</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"We are     very numerous, there are many families, so they complain [...]" <b>(professional       1)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>In this   study we observed, unlike the result found by Ara&uacute;jo et al. (2008), that this   issue is intimately related (but not only) to the insufficiency of   professionals to meet users' demand, as the population enrolled in one of the   studied units was highly above the limits accepted by the Ministry of Health   (Brasil, 2006). Piccini et al. (2006) and Cohn et al. (2002) identified a similar   problem, corroborating the idea that "the quantitative insufficiency of supply   implies, to a certain extent, qualitative insufficiency" (Cohn et al., 2002, p.8).</p>     <p>In the   case of access to the dentist, this situation was even more evident, due to the   fact that there is only one oral health team to two family health teams. The   fragment below reflects this issue.</p> </font></font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"Scheduling     the dental consultation is even more difficult. As I perform more concluded   treatments, I restrict the access even more". <b>(professional 7)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>This   finding is corroborated by Oliveira (2002), in a study developed about access   to and utilization of dental services of SUS in 2001, as the author verified that not even the basic procedures are guaranteed in all municipalities. </p>     <p>Another   aspect that was negatively highlighted by users was the emergency care which,   in view of their most acute needs, they expect to find in the nearest health   unit:</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"I caught     the infection [...]. I went there and no one assisted me, the woman told them     to take me to emergency care. This unit was supposed to have it". <b>(user 12, female       youth, attender, team A).</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>This   finding coincides with what was found in the study conducted by Dalmaso (2000),   who showed that emergencies are a (repressed) demand that is very frequent at   the primary healthcare units. Other authors (Merhy, Franco, 2005; Merhy et al.,   2002; Trad et al., 2002) recall that, mainly in the ESF, the lack of this   service is one of the main reasons for users' dissatisfaction. This result is, to   say the least, curious, in view of the fact that emergency is a service that is   already regulated in the ESF, and it is present in the management plan as an   additional resource to guarantee the principle of integrality in SUS (Brasil, 2006).</p>     <p>It is in   this direction that some authors criticize the structure of the ESF and the   insufficiency of primary healthcare (Merhy, Franco, 2005; Cohn et al., 2002;   Cec&iacute;lio, 1997). To these authors, users search for the health service in   situations of acute suffering and, when the primary healthcare unit does not   respond to their needs, they end up in the emergency services, crowding them   with demands that are considered "simple", which might have been solved at the   level of primary healthcare. This aspect could be verified by Kovacs et al.   (2005), in a study carried out at a pediatric emergency clinic at Recife, in which they observed that the access difficulty in primary healthcare was an   important reason for users to search for the analyzed emergency service.</p>     <p><b>Obstacles after entrance</b></p>     <p>To some   attenders, the obstacle would be in waiting for assistance at the unit, as the   fragment below shows:</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"The     doctor stays in the room and takes too long to assist us. […]" <b>(user 4, female       adult, attender, team A).</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Other   users situated the problem in the stool tests, urinalysis, blood tests and   cytology. The difficulties would not be exactly in performing these tests   (collection is facilitated because it takes place in the healthcare unit), but   in the return of their results. This problem was mentioned concerning only collections   performed at the unit, and not at the contracted out laboratory services -   which, in general, are located in areas that are more distant from the   peripheries where the primary healthcare units function. This issue is relevant   because it results in an additional effort of users (who have to go to the   laboratory and pay for transportation) in the search for a service that they believe is better, or, as far as this study is concerned, more accessible.</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"I did it there     [at the unit], then it took very long [...] This week he asked me to do some     blood tests, […] in the city, at a [contracted out] laboratory, I did them, and     five days later I went there to get the result". <b>(user 24, elderly woman,       attender, team B)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>The   explanation lies in the fact that the ESF units have only the collection   service; the laboratory analysis is performed at the Municipal Laboratory,   which is also responsible for sending the results to the collecting healthcare   units. The poor functioning in this other dimension of care (diagnostic   support) contributes to disqualify the actions carried out in the assistance dimension.</p>     <p>As for the   continuity of care in reference services, it was not regarded a problem by   users. The difficulty in scheduling consultations in the local unit (USF) - the   entrance door - seems to have been more felt by the population than the   difficulty in scheduling consultations with specialists or exams outside the   unit's catchment area.</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"[...] It     took a while but it arrived, so that I could go to Erm&iacute;rio de Moraes, because     they assist me there as heart physician". <b>(user 9, elderly woman, attender,       team A)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>We   identified, in this aspect, a certain difference between the discourses of   users, professionals and the manager concerning the perception of access. To   the professionals and the manager, the access to consultations with specialists   constitutes a great obstacle in the ESF, and to some specialties the difficulty is even greater.</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"Sometimes     it takes two months to schedule a consultation […] neurologist, cardiologist,     psychiatrist, not everybody is able to schedule it". <b>(professional 2)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>From the   manager's point-of-view, the difficulties are related to the excessive number   of referrals performed by primary healthcare, as she believes there are cases that can be solved in the scope of the unit which, however, are referred:</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"With the     organization of the scheduling of consultations at Policl&iacute;nica by the family     health units, I think this has facilitated the access […] Many patients are     referred to specialists without need […]". <b>(manager)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>Without   tackling the polemic discussion that involves the question of problem-solving   capacity or of the results of healthcare as a reference element for access   (Travassos, Martins, 2004, p.197), it is important to explain that this   perception should be seen with caution. First because, as the authors explain,   "the population's health does not result directly from the action of the health   systems"; second because, in the SIAB Indicators Evaluation Document, produced   by <i>Ger&ecirc;ncia Operacional de Aten&ccedil;&atilde;o &agrave; Sa&uacute;de</i> (GOAS - Health Care   Operational Management) of Sanitary District IV, the contrary was identified:   the average of referrals performed by the ESF in 2006 is within what is   expected of the studied teams - around 13% in one team and 6% in the other -, in   view of the fact that the Ministry of Health recommends to the ESF the   referral, to the reference services, of 20% of the assistances at the most. The   difficulty perceived by the professionals and the manager seems to be   associated with the insufficient number of specialty quotas to each family   health unit - a frailty that is closely related to limitations in the referral and counter-referral mechanisms.</p>     <p>These   mechanisms are items considered "necessary to the implementation of the Family   Health Teams" (Brasil, 2006, p.24) and constitute the "guarantee of referral   and counter-referral flows to the specialized services that provide diagnostic   and therapeutic support, and also outpatient clinic and hospital support". This   problem is associated with the question of the unfinished decentralization of   healthcare in the municipality, which still does not exercise the full   management of the SUS assistance network, a complex situation in which the   large public hospitals are still run by the state or federal governments.</p>     <p>As for the   users, their perception of easy access may be associated with their low   expectation in relation to the public services. The delay to receive   specialized assistance is already expected by them, and the mere fact of obtaining   assistance is already an important satisfaction factor. In this sense, the   representations that the users have of the public health services are closely   related to their experiences in searching for the assistance they need (Starfield,   2002; Halal et al., 1994). A similar perception was not observed in the study   conducted by Escorel et al. (2007), in which the families had a clearer   perception of this problem compared to the health professionals, who lacked   mechanisms to measure the waiting time and the magnitude of the queues.</p>     <p>The   fragment below draws attention again to the question of continuity of care:</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"[...] She     referred me to Lessa de Andrade, I'm being treated there. No, I didn't come     back. I continue doing it there". <b>(user 4, adult woman, attender, team A)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>This   testimony reveals that the responsibility for treating the disease moved to   another level of care, together with the responsibility for taking care of the   subject, who, from then on, detaches himself from the professional-user   relation established in primary healthcare. The focus on a professional's discourse reflects this discussion.</p> </font>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"[...]     This is important because if we have a primary healthcare unit with     professionals who assist that user [...] and we want to give continuity […] we     need this feedback. […] Then this user is lost". <b>(professional 6)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>The   continuity of assistance in another level of care, when the technologies   available in the primary level do not meet users' needs anymore, does not take   the responsibility away from the health team to which these users are linked.   The systematic follow-up of these users is a daily task in the ESF, and is   conditioned to the commitment (to the other) both of the professional who   refers and also of the one who receives the patient. According to Escorel et   al. (2007), communication and information exchange among professionals is very   important for the function of coordination attributed to the ESF and to guarantee continuity of care.</p>     <p>This   characteristic of a network of interconnected services with links that give   logic and meaning to the hierarchized health system constitutes a fundamental   element in the issue that has been discussed in this study, as access without   integrality of care limits the universalizing character of the system. In this   perspective, it is important to remember the criticism made by Cec&iacute;lio (1997)   against the hierarchy of the healthcare model of SUS: besides the fact that   this hierarchy, in practice, does not fully function (for reasons that cannot   be explained here, due to the limit of space of this paper), this model is   based on the notion of full functioning of a network whose constraints are felt   already in the entrance door. Thus, a referral and counter-referral mechanism   based on ESF tends to fail in its essential function, which is the guarantee of   what Cec&iacute;lio (2006) has called "amplified integrality".</p>     <p><b>Sociocultural dimension</b></p>     <p>The   reasons why users attend the healthcare units of this study expressed the   priority demand for actions and services related to disease control or cure   and/or reduction in some discomfort or indisposition, as the fragment below   shows:</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"it is     something in the mouth, or in the teeth, in my vision too [...]" <b>(user 18, male       youth, attender, team B).</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>According   to Cohn et al. (2002), the predominance of users' references to individual and   immediate consumption of the service shows that health is hardly seen and based   on a collective perspective, situated in the sphere of citizenship. On the   other hand, the offer of services presents a similar character, being   constituted mainly of healthcare actions. Therefore, it is a pattern of supply   and demand in keeping with an understanding of the health-disease process   centered on the biomedical model of healthcare, a conception that is fought by the reforming ideals of the Brazilian public health.</p>     <p>As regards   the concern about health, this was related, by one of the users, to   impossibility of working, or to the difficulty in getting a job due to an   illness. This difficulty in having access to a reference service not only   maintained but intensified his situation of shortage, both of a job and of   treatment.</p> </font>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"When I     had a job, I had to stop because of my spine, because it hurts a lot […] Then I     stopped working due to the problem. No, not until now [has not looked for     treatment yet]. It's hard to obtain referral to the doctor". <b>(user 8, male youth,       attender, team A)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>The mode   of insertion of the individuals in the job market - and the degree of freedom   that this insertion provides - may constitute an important limit, related: to   the material conditions of existence in this society, to the user's attendance at   the unit and to the search for the assistance he needs, as can be observed below:</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"[...] I     had to ask for two leaves [...]. Because I used to work as an office boy […],     then I didn't have time. When she [the employer] needed me, I was going there     in a hurry and I had no register on my working papers, then I couldn't go, then     I asked her for only one leave". (<b>user 23, male youth, non-attender, team B</b>) </font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>According   to Minayo (1999), in the capitalist society, the body represents the   "workforce", the only form that the individuals who do not own the means of   production have of reproducing themselves, or, in other words, of maintaining   their material conditions of survival. Therefore, from this derives a painful   existential experience, "representative" of a reality in which the body   constitutes the only source that generates goods. This understanding finds echo   in other studies. Barbosa and Coimbra J&uacute;nior (2000) identified, in a research   into schistosomiasis in a rural community of the Brazilian Northeast region,   that this disease only started to be considered by the adults as serious when   it disabled them from working or made the children be absent from school.   Following the same reflection, Bercini and Tomanik (2006), in a study developed   with fishermen's wives in the municipality of Porto Rico (Southern Brazil),   observed that, among the interviewed women, there was the perception -   constituted of meanings and values that belonged to that locality - that a healthy individual is the one with disposition and capacity to work.</p>     <p>The   community's participation is one of the fundamental principles of SUS, and   implies sharing power and responsibilities when making decisions which, after   all, affect all the involved individuals, and whose success, in case it occurs,   will be earned by all. Due to this, participation should be stimulated and,   above all, promoted by the ESF professionals, as the Ministry of Health   (Brasil, 2006) recommends. But, in a context of daily interaction (which is not   always pacific) between players in different power positions, with distinct   interests and possibilities, the participation idealized by SUS becomes a   project which has not been finished yet, as the experience reported below   corroborates:</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"[...]     they [the professionals] don't even want to see us talk. [...] we don't have     the right to meddle into anything. […] The community was supposed to get     together, […] and everybody would settle "it's this and that". <b>(user 14,       male adult, attender of unit B)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>The   incipient experience in the field of social participation, both of   professionals and users, added to the insufficient qualification of the two   groups, draws a conflicting picture in the local sphere, in the very space in   which the closest relationships (in all their dimensions) among these players take place.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Thus, seen   in a broad way, that is, as individuals' social needs, the health needs may be   transformed into <i>potentialities</i>, as Stotz (1991) warns us, provided that   the lacks motivate, commit and mobilize people.</p>     <p><b>Economic dimension</b></p>     <p>Economic   issues are almost always highlighted in studies related to access to health   services (Elias et al., 2006; Ribeiro et al., 2006; Travassos et al., 2000.).   Such studies constantly refer to an inversely proportional relation between the   individuals' socioeconomic situation and the possibility of access.</p>     <p>A   favorable aspect in this dimension was the availability of medicines at the   healthcare unit. However, in spite of the fact that the USF pharmacy is stocked   on a monthly basis, it does not receive the amount of medicines that   corresponds to the need of all users. This makes the search for medicines   become a process that requires agility, because the guarantee is for those who   arrive first (before they end). Thus, at the same time it was a facility -   because, although in small amounts, the medicines are provided at the unit,   which is nearby and makes the medicines available for people to fetch them - expenditures   on medicines was also a serious difficulty for some users. The deep condition   of social injustice to which these individuals are submitted (which already   excludes them from access to other goods and products which are indispensable   to the maintenance of life and health) deprives them, on a daily basis, of the   right to incur this expense:</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"No [he     did not spend money on medicines]. I don't have this money. […] The unit ran     out of it once, but I never bought it […]" <b>(user 11, elderly man, attender,       team A).</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>The   discourse of all the professionals revealed the deep knowledge they seem to   have of the reality of shortages which is recurrently experienced by the users,   whose problems are reflected on the demands to the unit. There is also the   feeling of impotence and distress in view of such a cruel reality, degrading of the human condition. In this sense, we highlight the discourse below:</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"[...]     Many times they don't eat, or eat very badly because the medicine they need is     not available here at the unit. So, in a certain way, they spend money, they spend     what they don't have". <b>(professional 6)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>Living in   a situation of permanent contact with pain and so many material shortages makes   the working environment become complex, as well as the personal and professional   interrelations which are processed in the daily working routine. Thus,   "institutional symptoms" are produced, such as communication failures or   excessive ideologization in defense of the SUS, as mentioned by Campos (2005). It is important to reflect that the understanding of healthcare should   always be viewed within the context of the labor relations, of the peculiarities of the work of the care producers (Deslandes, 2005).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>In the records   of the field diary, the result of direct observation in the services, it was   possible to identify, besides lack of medicines - including the ones contained   in the list of medicines standardized by the municipality -, the lack of male   preservatives, which have been supplied in the public services since the 1980s,   as Ramos and Lima (2003) explain. These authors also identified this problem in   a study about access and receptiveness at a healthcare unit located in Porto Alegre (Southern Brazil).</p>     <p>Some   professionals' discourse about the expenses users must incur when they are   referred to other services, belonging or not to the municipal health network,   reveals another reality, as shown by the example below:</p> </font>     <blockquote>       <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">"[...]     Many times they don't do it because of the ticket […]. Sometimes it's difficult     to reach a specialist, and when it happens, the person doesn't go to him     because of the distance". <b>(professional 2)</b></font></p> </blockquote> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p>These   discourses reflect the mode of organization of the health services network;   they refer to the principle of decentralization with hierarchization and   regionalization of the services network. The chronic situation of social   exclusion in which the great majority of the SUS users lives hold this model in   check when it reveals that it is not articulated to another network - that of   social services, including services of income generation. This aspect is   fundamental, because this network meets other needs (health needs) linked with   people's way of earning their living, with people's precarious material   conditions of existence, which result from a scenario of injustices and social   inequalities. These aspects have been worrying the set of social players engaged in making public health effectively accessible to all the Brazilians.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"><b>Conclusions</b></font></p>     <p>This study   aimed to evaluate the access to healthcare in the SUS based on the perception   of users of the Family Health Strategy, triangulating and confronting it with   the point of view of the manager and of health professionals. It was observed   that the existence of services, associated with the expansion of the coverage   of primary healthcare, although important, does not imply effective access. Due   to this, the organizational change arising with ESF has an important   implication in the organization of the health system, because primary   healthcare was regulated as the privileged form of access, assuming the   function of restructuring the entire care model and reorganizing the assistance   practices. </p>     <p>In the   present study, the analysis of access brought to light aspects of healthcare in   Brazil that are already known. The relevant issue, however, is the fact that   problems related to access in the ESF reveal the existence of obstacles in the   system that may compromise its entire structure of organization and   functioning. Moreover, it may imply the exclusion of millions of individuals   whose precarious life conditions already deprive them of many citizenship   rights. </p>     <p>Elements   that facilitate and hinder the access were identified. The facilitating ones   were: the working hours, receptiveness and the proximity of the USF services.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The most critical situations pointed by the users' discourses were:</p>     <p>1 organizational dimension:</p>     <p>(i) delay   to schedule a consultation; (ii) poor functioning of the referral and   counter-referral system, compromising the access to specialists; (iii)   excessive number of people enrolled in the teams' areas; (iv) delay, at the   waiting room, to receive assistance; (v) delay to receive test results; (vi)   ESF's low capacity to solve problems, particularly due to the absence of   assistance to simple emergencies, implying overloading the services of medium   and high complexity.</p>     <p>2 sociocultural dimension:</p>     <p>(i)   professionals' and users' lack of preparation concerning the organization and   execution of joint actions; (ii) low capacity to visualize the collective   perspective of health, situated in the field of citizenship. </p>     <p>3 economic dimension:</p>     <p>(i)   expenses on medicines and other inputs.</p>     <p>The ESF,   as a strategy to promote the access of people with complex social needs to the   health actions and services, proved to be a narrow entrance door, deserving to   be evaluated with a more critical look that takes into account the situations   that particularize the individuals who request its actions, and services organization based on the subjects' needs.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"><b>COLLABORATORS</b></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Ana L&uacute;cia   Martins de Azevedo reviewed the literature, elaborated the research   instruments, collected and analyzed the data and wrote the paper. Andr&eacute; Monteiro Costa</p>     <p>supervised   the investigation, the elaboration of the instruments and data collection,   analyzed the data and helped to write the paper.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif"><b>REFERENCES</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p>ARA&Uacute;JO, M.A.L.; VIEIRA, N.F.C.;   SILVA, R.M. Implementa&ccedil;&atilde;o do diagn&oacute;stico da infec&ccedil;&atilde;o pelo HIV para gestantes em Unidade B&aacute;sica de Sa&uacute;de da Fam&iacute;lia em Fortaleza, Cear&aacute;. <b>Cienc. Saude Colet</b>., v.13, n.6, p.1899-906, 2008.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>AZEVEDO, A.M.A. <b>Acesso &agrave;   aten&ccedil;&atilde;o &agrave; sa&uacute;de no SUS:</b> o PSF como (estreita) porta de entrada. 2007. Disserta&ccedil;&atilde;o (Mestrado em Sa&uacute;de Coletiva) - N&uacute;cleo de Estudos em Sa&uacute;de Coletiva, Instituto Aggeu Magalh&atilde;es, Recife. 2007.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>BARBOSA, S.C.; COIMBRA J&Uacute;NIOR,   C.E.A. A constru&ccedil;&atilde;o cultural da esquistossomose em comunidade agr&iacute;cola de   Pernambuco. In: BARATA, R.B.; BRICE&Ntilde;O-LEON, R. (Orgs.). <b>Doen&ccedil;as end&ecirc;micas:</b> abordagens sociais, culturais e contempor&acirc;neas. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2000. p.47-60.    </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>BARDIN, L. <b>An&aacute;lise de conte&uacute;do</b>. Lisboa: Edi&ccedil;&otilde;es 70, 2004.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>BERCINI, L.O.; TOMANIK, E.A. <b>Aspectos   sobre sa&uacute;de, ambiente e representa&ccedil;&otilde;es sociais na popula&ccedil;&atilde;o de Porto Rico,   Paran&aacute;</b>. Dispon&iacute;vel em:   &lt;<a href="http://www.peld.uem.br/Relat2002/pdf/comp_social_econ_aspectos.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.peld.uem.br/Relat2002/pdf/comp_social_econ_aspectos.pdf</a>&gt;. Acesso em: 16 jan. 2006.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>BOBBIO, N. <b>A era dos direitos</b>. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2004.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>BRASIL. Minist&eacute;rio da Sa&uacute;de. Pol&iacute;tica <b>Nacional de Aten&ccedil;&atilde;o B&aacute;sica</b>. Bras&iacute;lia, 2006.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>CAMPOS, R.O. O encontro   trabalhador-usu&aacute;rio na aten&ccedil;&atilde;o &agrave; sa&uacute;de: uma contribui&ccedil;&atilde;o da narrativa   psicanal&iacute;tica ao tema do sujeito na sa&uacute;de coletiva. <b>Cienc. Saude Colet.</b>, v.10, n.3, p.573-82, 2005.    </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>CEC&Iacute;LIO, L.C.O. As necessidades de   sa&uacute;de como conceito estruturante na luta pela integralidade e equidade na   aten&ccedil;&atilde;o &agrave; sa&uacute;de. In: PINHEIRO, R.; MATTOS, R.A. (Orgs.). <b>Os sentidos da integralidade na aten&ccedil;&atilde;o e no cuidado &agrave; sa&uacute;de</b>. Rio de Janeiro: Abrasco, 2006. p.115-28.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>______. O desafio de qualificar o   atendimento prestado pelos hospitais  p&uacute;blicos. In: MERHY, E.E.; ONOCKO, R.   (Orgs.). <b>Agir em sa&uacute;de:</b> um desafio para o p&uacute;blico. S&atilde;o Paulo: Hucitec, 2002. p.293-319. (Sa&uacute;de em Debate, 108; S&eacute;rie Did&aacute;tica, 6).    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>______. Modelos tecno-assistenciais em sa&uacute;de: da pir&acirc;mide ao c&iacute;rculo, uma possibilidade a ser explorada. <b>Cad. Saude Publica</b>, v.13, n.3, p.469-78, 1997.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>CHIZZOTTI, A. <b>Pesquisa em ci&ecirc;ncias humanas e sociais</b>. 7.ed. S&atilde;o Paulo: Cortez, 2005.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>COHN, A. et al. <b>A sa&uacute;de como direito e como servi&ccedil;o</b>. 3.ed. S&atilde;o Paulo: Cortez, 2002.    </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>DALMASO, A.S.W. Atendimento &agrave;   demanda espont&acirc;nea: pronto-atendimento e atividades program&aacute;ticas. In:   SCHRAIBER l.B.; NEMES, M.I.B.; MENDES-GON&Ccedil;ALVES, R.B. (Orgs.). <b>Sa&uacute;de do     adulto</b>: programas e a&ccedil;&otilde;es na unidade b&aacute;sica. S&atilde;o Paulo: Hucitec, 2000.   p.151-72. (Sa&uacute;de em Debate, 96; S&eacute;rie Did&aacute;tica, 3).    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>DESLANDES, S.F. A &oacute;tica de   gestores sobre humaniza&ccedil;&atilde;o da assist&ecirc;ncia nas maternidades municipais do Rio de Janeiro. <b>Cienc. Saude Colet.</b>, v.10, n.3, p.615-26, 2005.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>DIMENSTEIN, M. et al. Avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o e   qualidade em sa&uacute;de na perspectiva da equipe multiprofissional na rede b&aacute;sica de   Natal/RN. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE SA&Uacute;DE COLETIVA, 7., 2003, Bras&iacute;lia. <b>Anais...</b> Bras&iacute;lia: Associa&ccedil;&atilde;o Brasileira de Sa&uacute;de Coletiva, 2003. Suplemento 2, p.521.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>DONABEDIAN,   A. <b>La</b> <b>calidad de la atencion m&eacute;dica</b>: definici&oacute;n y m&eacute;todos de evaluaci&oacute;n. M&eacute;xico: Ediciones Copilco, 1984.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>ELIAS,   P.E. et al. Aten&ccedil;&atilde;o b&aacute;sica em sa&uacute;de: compara&ccedil;&atilde;o entre PSF e UBS por estrato   de exclus&atilde;o social no munic&iacute;pio de S&atilde;o Paulo. <b>Cienc. Saude Colet.</b>, v.11, n.3, p.633-41, 2006.    </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>ESCOREL, S. et al. Programa de   Sa&uacute;de da Fam&iacute;lia e a constru&ccedil;&atilde;o de um novo modelo para a aten&ccedil;&atilde;o b&aacute;sica no Brasil. <b>Rev. Panam. Salud Publica</b>, v.2, n.21, p.164-76, 2007.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>FACCHINI,   L.A. et al. Desempenho do PSF no sul e no nordeste do Brasil: avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o   institucional e epidemiol&oacute;gica da aten&ccedil;&atilde;o b&aacute;sica &agrave; sa&uacute;de. <b>Cienc. Saude Colet.</b>, v.11 n.3, p.669-81, 2006.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>FEKETE, M.C. <b>Estudo da   acessibilidade na avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o dos servi&ccedil;os</b>. Projeto GERUS. s.l.. s.n, 1996.   Dispon&iacute;vel em: &lt;www.opas.org.br/rh/publicacoes/textos_apoio/pub06U1T1.pdf&gt;. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2007.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>FOUCAULT, M. <b>Microf&iacute;sica do poder</b>. Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1979.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>FRIEDRICH, D.B.C.; PIERANTONI,   C.R. O trabalho das equipes da sa&uacute;de fam&iacute;lia: um olhar sobre as dimens&otilde;es   organizativa do processo produtivo, pol&iacute;tico-ideol&oacute;gica e econ&ocirc;mica em Juiz de Fora. <b>Physis</b>, v.16, n.1, p.83-97, 2006.    </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>GIOVANELLA, L.; MENDON&Ccedil;A, M.H.M.   Aten&ccedil;&atilde;o prim&aacute;ria &agrave; sa&uacute;de. In: GIOVANELLA, L. et al. (Orgs.). <b>Pol&iacute;ticas e sistemas de sa&uacute;de</b>. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2008.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>HALAL,   I.S. et al. Avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o da qualidade da assist&ecirc;ncia prim&aacute;ria &agrave; sa&uacute;de em   localidade urbana da Regi&atilde;o Sul do Brasil. <b>Rev. Saude Publica</b>, v.28, n.2, p.131-6, 1994.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>KOVACS,   M.H. et al. Acessibilidade &agrave;s a&ccedil;&otilde;es b&aacute;sicas entre crian&ccedil;as atendidas em servi&ccedil;os de pronto socorro. <b>J. Pediatria</b>, v.81, n.3, p.251-8, 2005.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>MATTOS, R.A. Os sentidos da   integralidade: algumas reflex&otilde;es acerca de valores que merecem ser defendidos.   In: PINHEIRO, R.; MATTOS, R.A. (Orgs.). <b>Os sentidos da integralidade na aten&ccedil;&atilde;o e no cuidado &agrave; sa&uacute;de</b>. Rio de Janeiro: Abrasco, 2001. p.39-64.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>MERHY,   E.E. et al. Em busca de ferramentas analisadoras das tecnologias em sa&uacute;de: a   informa&ccedil;&atilde;o e o dia a dia de um servi&ccedil;o de sa&uacute;de, interrogando e gerindo   trabalho em sa&uacute;de. In: MERHY, E.E.; ONOCKO, R. (Orgs.). <b>Agir em sa&uacute;de:</b> um desafio para o p&uacute;blico. S&atilde;o Paulo: Hucitec, 2002b. p.113-50. (Sa&uacute;de em Debate, 108; S&eacute;rie Did&aacute;tica, 6).    </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>MERHY, E.E.; FRANCO, T. <b>PSF:</b> contradi&ccedil;&otilde;es e novos desafios. Confer&ecirc;ncia Nacional de Sa&uacute;de On-Line, 1996.   Dispon&iacute;vel em: &lt;<a href="http://www.datasus.gov.br/cns/temas/tribuna/PsfTito.htm" target="_blank">http://www.datasus.gov.br/cns/temas/tribuna/PsfTito.htm</a>&gt;.   Acesso em: 29 ago. 2005.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>MERHY, E.E.; QUEIROZ, M.S. Sa&uacute;de   p&uacute;blica, rede b&aacute;sica e o sistema de sa&uacute;de brasileiro. <b>Cad. Saude Publica</b>, v.2, n.9, p.177-84, 1993.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>MINAYO, M.C.S. <b>O desafio do conhecimento:</b> pesquisa qualitativa em sa&uacute;de. S&atilde;o Paulo: Hucitec, 1999.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>OLIVEIRA, L.M.A. <b>Sa&uacute;de bucal em   Pernambuco:</b> acesso e utiliza&ccedil;&atilde;o dos servi&ccedil;os odontol&oacute;gicos do SUS em 2001. 2002. Monografia (Programa de Resid&ecirc;ncia Multiprofissional em Sa&uacute;de Coletiva) - Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalh&atilde;es/Fiocruz, Recife. 2002.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>PICCINI,   R.X. et al. Necessidades de sa&uacute;de comuns aos idosos: efetividade na oferta e   utiliza&ccedil;&atilde;o em aten&ccedil;&atilde;o b&aacute;sica. <b>Cienc. Saude Colet.</b>, v.11, n.3, p.657-67, 2006.    </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>RAMOS, D.D.; LIMA, M.A.D.S. Acesso   e acolhimento aos usu&aacute;rios em uma unidade de sa&uacute;de de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. <b>Cad. Saude Publica</b>, v.19, n.1, p.27-34, 2003.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>RECIFE. Prefeitura Municipal. <b>Cadernos de informa&ccedil;&atilde;o:</b> 2001-2007. Recife, 2008.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>RIBEIRO, M.C.A. et al. Perfil   s&oacute;ciodemogr&aacute;fico e padr&atilde;o de utiliza&ccedil;&atilde;o de servi&ccedil;os de sa&uacute;de para usu&aacute;rios e   n&atilde;o-usu&aacute;rios do SUS - PNAD 2003. <b>Cienc. Saude Colet.</b>, v.11, n.4, p.657-67, 2006.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>S&Aacute;, D.A. <b>Aten&ccedil;&atilde;o &agrave; sa&uacute;de no   Brasil:</b> um estudo do acesso &agrave; assist&ecirc;ncia a partir do Sistema de Informa&ccedil;&atilde;o do SUS (SIA-SUS). 2002. Disserta&ccedil;&atilde;o (Mestrado em Sa&uacute;de P&uacute;blica) - N&uacute;cleo de Estudos em Sa&uacute;de Coletiva. Instituto Aggeu Magalh&atilde;es, Recife. 2002.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>STARFIELD, B. <b>Aten&ccedil;&atilde;o prim&aacute;ria: </b>equil&iacute;brio entre necessidades de sa&uacute;de, servi&ccedil;os e tecnologia. Bras&iacute;lia: Unesco, Minist&eacute;rio da Sa&uacute;de, 2002.    </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>STOTZ, E.N. <b>Necessidades de   sa&uacute;de: </b>media&ccedil;&otilde;es de um conceito (contribui&ccedil;&atilde;o das ci&ecirc;ncias sociais para a   fundamenta&ccedil;&atilde;o te&oacute;rico-metodol&oacute;gica de conceitos operacionais da &aacute;rea de   planejamento em sa&uacute;de). 1991. Tese (Doutorado) - Escola Nacional de Sa&uacute;de P&uacute;blica, Funda&ccedil;&atilde;o Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro. 1991.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>TRAD,   L.A.B. et al. Estudo etnogr&aacute;fico da satisfa&ccedil;&atilde;o do usu&aacute;rio do Programa de Sa&uacute;de da Fam&iacute;lia (PSF) na Bahia. <b>Cienc. Saude Colet.</b>, v.7, n.3, p.581-9, 2002.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>TRAVASSOS, C. et al. Desigualdades   geogr&aacute;ficas e sociais na utiliza&ccedil;&atilde;o de servi&ccedil;os de sa&uacute;de no Brasil. <b>Cad. Saude Publica</b>, v.5, n.1, p.133-49, 2000.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>TRAVASSOS, C.; MARTINS, M. Uma   revis&atilde;o sobre os conceitos de acesso e utiliza&ccedil;&atilde;o de servi&ccedil;os de sa&uacute;de. <b>Cad. Saude Publica</b>, v.20, supl.2, p.190-8, 2004.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>VIEIRA DA SILVA, L.M. Conceitos,   abordagens e estrat&eacute;gias para avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o em sa&uacute;de.  In: HARTZ, Z.M.A.; VIEIRA DA SILVA, L.M. (Orgs.). <b>Avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o em sa&uacute;de:</b> dos   modelos te&oacute;ricos &agrave; pr&aacute;tica na avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o de programas e sistemas de sa&uacute;de. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2005. p.15-39.    </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a href="#_ednref1" name="_edn1">i</a> Address: Av.   Santos Dumont, 508, apto. 403. Aflitos, Recife, PE, Brasil. 52.050-050.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1">1</a> Based on Azevedo (2007);   non-financed research approved by the Research Ethics Committee of   Fiocruz/CPqAM.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref2" name="_ftn2">2</a> When it was created, in 1994,   the Family Health Strategy was called <i>Programa Sa&uacute;de da Fam&iacute;lia</i> (PSF -   Family Health Program).    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref3" name="_ftn3">3</a> The concept of access is not   a consensus in the literature, and the employed terminology is also variable.   In the present study, access and accessibility are considered synonymous, and   the term access is predominantly adopted.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref4" name="_ftn4">4</a> All the quotations have been   translated into English for the purposes of this paper.</p> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ARAÚJO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIEIRA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.F.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SILVA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Implementação do diagnóstico da infecção pelo HIV para gestantes em Unidade Básica de Saúde da Família em Fortaleza, Ceará]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cienc. Saude Colet.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1899-906</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[AZEVEDO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Acesso à atenção à saúde no SUS: o PSF como (estreita) porta de entrada]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BARBOSA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COIMBRA JÚNIOR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.E.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[A construção cultural da esquistossomose em comunidade agrícola de Pernambuco]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BARATA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BRICEÑO-LEON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Doenças endêmicas: abordagens sociais, culturais e contemporâneas]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<page-range>47-60</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fiocruz]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BARDIN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Análise de conteúdo]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Lisboa ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Edições 70]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BERCINI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.O.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TOMANIK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Aspectos sobre saúde, ambiente e representações sociais na população de Porto Rico, Paraná]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOBBIO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A era dos direitos.]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>BRASIL^dMinistério da Saúde</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Política Nacional de Atenção Básica.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CAMPOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[O encontro trabalhador-usuário na atenção à saúde: uma contribuição da narrativa psicanalítica ao tema do sujeito na saúde coletiva]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cienc. Saude Colet.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>573-82</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CECÍLIO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.C.O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[As necessidades de saúde como conceito estruturante na luta pela integralidade e equidade na atenção à saúde]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PINHEIRO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MATTOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Os sentidos da integralidade na atenção e no cuidado à saúde]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<page-range>115-28</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Abrasco]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CECÍLIO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.C.O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[O desafio de qualificar o atendimento prestado pelos hospitais públicos]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MERHY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ONOCKO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Agir em saúde: um desafio para o público]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hucitec293-319]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CECÍLIO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.C.O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Modelos tecno-assistenciais em saúde: da pirâmide ao círculo, uma possibilidade a ser explorada]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cad. Saude Publica]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>469-78</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CHIZZOTTI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Pesquisa em ciências humanas e sociais]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<edition>7</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cortez]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COHN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A saúde como direito e como serviço.]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<edition>3</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cortez]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DALMASO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.S.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Atendimento à demanda espontânea: pronto-atendimento e atividades programáticas]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHRAIBER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[l.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NEMES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.I.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MENDES-GONÇALVES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Saúde do adulto: programas e ações na unidade básica]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<page-range>151-72</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hucitec]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DESLANDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[A ótica de gestores sobre humanização da assistência nas maternidades municipais do Rio de Janeiro]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cienc. Saude Colet.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>615-26</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DIMENSTEIN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Avaliação e qualidade em saúde na perspectiva da equipe multiprofissional na rede básica de Natal/RN]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anais...]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[7 CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE SAÚDE COLETIVA]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>2003</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Brasília </conf-loc>
<page-range>521</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DONABEDIAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La calidad de la atencion médica: definición y métodos de evaluación]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ediciones Copilco]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ELIAS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Atenção básica em saúde: comparação entre PSF e UBS por estrato de exclusão social no município de São Paulo]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cienc. Saude Colet.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>633-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ESCOREL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Programa de Saúde da Família e a construção de um novo modelo para a atenção básica no Brasil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. Panam. Salud Publica]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>21</numero>
<issue>21</issue>
<page-range>164-76</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FACCHINI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Desempenho do PSF no sul e no nordeste do Brasil: avaliação institucional e epidemiológica da atenção básica à saúde]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cienc. Saude Colet.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>669-81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FEKETE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Estudo da acessibilidade na avaliação dos serviços.]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Projeto GERUS]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FOUCAULT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Microfísica do poder]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Graal]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FRIEDRICH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.B.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PIERANTONI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[O trabalho das equipes da saúde família: um olhar sobre as dimensões organizativa do processo produtivo, político-ideológica e econômica em Juiz de Fora]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Physis]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>83-97</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GIOVANELLA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MENDONÇA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.H.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Atenção primária à saúde]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GIOVANELLA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Políticas e sistemas de saúde]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fiocruz]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HALAL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Avaliação da qualidade da assistência primária à saúde em localidade urbana da Região Sul do Brasil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. Saude Publica]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>131-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KOVACS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Acessibilidade às ações básicas entre crianças atendidas em serviços de pronto socorro]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Pediatria]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>81</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>251-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MATTOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Os sentidos da integralidade: algumas reflexões acerca de valores que merecem ser defendidos]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PINHEIRO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MATTOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Os sentidos da integralidade na atenção e no cuidado à saúde.]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<page-range>39-64</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Abrasco]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MERHY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Em busca de ferramentas analisadoras das tecnologias em saúde: a informação e o dia a dia de um serviço de saúde, interrogando e gerindo trabalho em saúde]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MERHY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ONOCKO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Agir em saúde: um desafio para o público.]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<page-range>113-50</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hucitec]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MERHY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FRANCO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[PSF: contradições e novos desafios]]></source>
<year></year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Conferência Nacional de Saúde On-Line]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>1996</conf-date>
<conf-loc> </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MERHY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[QUEIROZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Saúde pública, rede básica e o sistema de saúde brasileiro]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cad. Saude Publica]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>177-84</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MINAYO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.C.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hucitec]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[OLIVEIRA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.M.A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Saúde bucal em Pernambuco: acesso e utilização dos serviços odontológicos do SUS em 2001. 2002]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PICCINI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.X.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Necessidades de saúde comuns aos idosos: efetividade na oferta e utilização em atenção básica.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cienc. Saude Colet.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>657-67</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RAMOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LIMA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.D.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Acesso e acolhimento aos usuários em uma unidade de saúde de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cad. Saude Publica]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>27-34</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>RECIFE^dPrefeitura Municipal</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Cadernos de informação: 2001-2007]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Recife ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RIBEIRO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.C.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Perfil sóciodemográfico e padrão de utilização de serviços de saúde para usuários e não-usuários do SUS - PNAD 2003]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cienc. Saude Colet.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>657-67</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SÁ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Atenção à saúde no Brasil: um estudo do acesso à assistência a partir do Sistema de Informação do SUS (SIA-SUS)]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[STARFIELD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Atenção primária: equilíbrio entre necessidades de saúde, serviços e tecnologia]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Unesco, Ministério da Saúde]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[STOTZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Necessidades de saúde: mediações de um conceito (contribuição das ciências sociais para a fundamentação teórico-metodológica de conceitos operacionais da área de planejamento em saúde)]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TRAD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.A.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Estudo etnográfico da satisfação do usuário do Programa de Saúde da Família (PSF) na Bahia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cienc. Saude Colet.]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>581-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TRAVASSOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Desigualdades geográficas e sociais na utilização de serviços de saúde no Brasil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cad. Saude Publica]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>133-49</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TRAVASSOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARTINS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Uma revisão sobre os conceitos de acesso e utilização de serviços de saúde]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cad. Saude Publica]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>^s2</numero>
<issue>^s2</issue>
<supplement>2</supplement>
<page-range>190-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIEIRA DA SILVA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Conceitos, abordagens e estratégias para avaliação em saúde]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HARTZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z.M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIEIRA DA SILVA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação em saúde: dos modelos teóricos à prática na avaliação de programas e sistemas de saúde]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<page-range>15-39</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fiocruz]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
