<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0104-8333</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Cadernos Pagu]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Cad. Pagu]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0104-8333</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Núcleo de Estudos de Gênero - Pagu]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0104-83332010000100001</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA["Women are evil": personhood, gender, and disease in southern Mozambique]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Passador]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luiz Henrique]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A">
<institution><![CDATA[,  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>se</numero>
<fpage>0</fpage>
<lpage>0</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0104-83332010000100001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0104-83332010000100001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0104-83332010000100001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Taking a case of illness and death attributed to sorcery, the article examines the connections between personhood, gender and disease in Southern Mozambique, where women are traditionally feared and accused of producing evil through spells.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Partindo de um caso de doença e morte atribuídas à feitiçaria, o artigo analisa as articulações entre pessoa, gênero e doença que operam no Sul de Moçambique, onde as mulheres são tradicionalmente temidas e acusadas de produzirem malefícios através de feitiços.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Mozambique]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Gender]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Kinship]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Witchcraft]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Illness]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Moçambique]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Gênero]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Parentesco]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Feitiçaria]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Doença]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p><font face="verdana" size="4"><b>"Women are evil": personhood, gender, and disease in southern Mozambique<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><sup><b>*</b></sup></a></b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Luiz   Henrique Passador<a href="#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2"><sup><b>**</b></sup></a></b></p>     <p>Translated by Henrique   Mariotto    <br>   Translated from <b><a href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-83332010000200007&lng=pt&nrm=iso" target="_blank">Cadernos     Pagu</a></b><a href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-83332010000200007&lng=pt&nrm=iso" target="_blank">, Campinas, n.35, p. 177-210, Dez. 2010</a>.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Taking a case of illness   and death attributed to sorcery, the article examines the connections between   personhood, gender and disease in Southern Mozambique, where women are   traditionally feared and accused of producing evil through spells.</p>     <p><b>Keywords: </b>Mozambique, Gender,   Kinship, Witchcraft, Illness.</p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p><b>RESUMO</b></p>     <p>Partindo de um caso de doen&ccedil;a e morte atribu&iacute;das &agrave;   feiti&ccedil;aria, o artigo analisa as articula&ccedil;&otilde;es entre pessoa, g&ecirc;nero e doen&ccedil;a que   operam no Sul de Mo&ccedil;ambique, onde as mulheres s&atilde;o tradicionalmente temidas e   acusadas de produzirem malef&iacute;cios atrav&eacute;s de feiti&ccedil;os.</p>     <p><b>Palavras-chave:&nbsp; </b>Mo&ccedil;ambique,   G&ecirc;nero, Parentesco, Feiti&ccedil;aria, Doen&ccedil;a.</p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>The tile of   this article reproduces a phrase that I heard in Homo&iacute;ne, a district in Southern Mozambique. That statement seemed to reveal a gender configuration that imposes   specific experiences on women in that social universe. In order to explain it   and provide it with a context, I will have to describe a fact I observed in 2007.</p>     <p>Jos&eacute;<a href="#_ftn3" name="_ftnref3"><sup>1</sup></a> passed away in October. He was   a 27-year-old man from Homo&iacute;ne and worked as an English teacher at a school in   the district's main village. He was married to Dalva, a 23-year-old teacher   from Gaza. He had a disease that left him emaciated in less than one month and   unleashed a series of accusations of sorcery involving his family members,   neighbors, and certain women. Connections were established with other deaths in   his family group and in an extended network of friends among a group of   influential young men in Homo&iacute;ne.</p>     <p>The case   involves a wide set of variables which will be summed up here in order to make   it minimally understandable. Jos&eacute; was the second child of the second marriage   of his father, a polygamous <i>curandeiro</i><a href="#_ftn4" name="_ftnref4"><sup>2</sup></a> who lived with his second wife - Jos&eacute;'s mother - and his third wife. His father   had separated from his first wife, who at the time lived in the neighboring   District of Morrumbene, where he was born and where he had his <i>machambas.</i><a href="#_ftn5" name="_ftnref5"><sup>3</sup></a> Jos&eacute; had married Dalva in 2006 without   a civil register and without paying off the <i>lobolo</i><a href="#_ftn6" name="_ftnref6"><sup>4</sup></a> - only his presentation to his   wife's family had been formalized. He went to live with his wife in a house he   had built far away from his father's residence. He was very skilled in making   influential friends, including friends among the rare white foreigners who came   to the village. He was ambitious and people commented he was not to be trusted   when it came to other people's goods, not even his relatives' ones. He was   associated with a group of influential young males in the village who were   members of the Football Association of the district, presided by one of the   district's traditional chieftains.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>In the   beginning of 2007, Jos&eacute; and Dalva had their first and only son, who died   suddenly in April of a disease whose diagnosis was confusing and surrounded by   silence and half words. His older sister, the first child of his father's   marriage to his mother, had also died of a similar disease in 2005.  The   symptoms were vomiting, constant fever, body aches, difficulty swallowing solid   food, wounds all over the body and in the mouth, mental confusion, emaciation,   and death. Other five members of the Morrumbene family group had already died   within two years, all with the same symptoms and disease.</p>     <p>During the   time Jos&eacute; was ill, he avoided taking any food prepared or offered to him by   members of his family, including his wife. His food intake was limited to   coconut water and food he was able to swallow, but provided that they were   brought and fed to him by his best friend - who he classed as a cousin. In the   visits I paid him he asked me to bring him some industrialized yogurt sold in   shops. He had been admitted at the Health Center of Homo&iacute;ne and diagnosed with   malaria<a href="#_ftn7" name="_ftnref7"><sup>5</sup></a>,   but his family rapidly came to a diagnosis of a "traditional disease" caused by   sorcery, took him from the hospital and brought him home. He was then submitted   to treatment by a <i>curandeiro</i> recommended by his father. After some   back-and-forth visits from the hospital to some <i>curandeiros</i> and   vice-versa, Jos&eacute; passed away at the house of the last <i>curandeiro</i> he   visited. The latter only had time to come to a partial diagnosis of his disease   by means of the <i>tihlolo</i><a href="#_ftn8" name="_ftnref8"><sup>6</sup></a> and found indications that the evil deed had come from somebody belonging to   the deceased's family group.</p>     <p>His death   caused consternation in the village and unleashed rumors on who had been   responsible for the spell. His father, already suspected of having caused all   the previous diseases and deaths within his family group, was accused even by   his children. In the main village, people commented that "everybody knows it   was his father" who had caused Jos&eacute;'s disease and death. The partial diagnosis   given by the last consulted <i>curandeiro</i> only incited the rumor mongering.   Jos&eacute;'s mother was also involved as a potential co-author, as she did not   demonstrate sorrow during the funeral, nor had she grieved the death of her son   in public - Jos&eacute;'s father had the same attitude.</p>     <p>While the   case remained unsolved, the family had a summit with Jos&eacute;'s father in   Morrumbene during the week that followed the funeral. He was aware that he   would be seen as the main suspect. People suspected that he was killing members   of his family in order to benefit from the use of spells, and Jos&eacute; would have   been only the last victim. Considered to be a "true" <i>curandeiro</i> because   he had inherited the powers of ancestors who had also been <i>curandeiros</i>,   the father would also have bought spirits from other healers in order to become   more powerful, guarantee his promotion in the administrative and party   structures, and sustain the high productivity of his <i>machambas</i>. In order   to benefit from these powers, he would have to kill his relatives, which would   be insignificant losses in face of the gains he was supposed to obtain. Moreover,   Jos&eacute; and his sister had challenged their father and his traditional paternal   power, which was based on a system of agnatic succession and patrilocal   residence. Jos&eacute;'s sister alone decided to leave her father's house before   getting married, and moved to Morrumbene. Jos&eacute; had also left the surroundings   of his father's house and settled residence somewhere else. Therefore, both   children had become autonomous in relation to their father.</p>     <p>Jos&eacute; was a   "modern" person, so to say. He earned his living without having any <i>machambas</i>,   worked in the formal job market, had left the structures that would have   submitted him to his father's sphere of influence, and was in the process of   becoming a "great man" in the main village for his own extra-traditional   merits, achieved individually within a network of privileged friends. His new   house - with electric power and located in a good neighborhood - was the symbol   of this situation of privilege and independence. People commented that the   death of Jos&eacute; and his son in the same year had been caused by his father's envy   or anger in retaliation to his individual success and insubordination to his   father. But even in terms of the "traditional"<a href="#_ftn9" name="_ftnref9"><sup>7</sup></a> universe, Jos&eacute; was a young man in the process of becoming a "great man". He had   married a young, dedicated, hard-working, and fertile wife. He only needed   children to start his own core of descendants, to be extended by the matrimonial   alliances that his children would make in the future.</p>     <p>While Jos&eacute;   was ill and before the accusations against his father and mother became stronger   and hegemonic, a series of speculations related the cause of his disease to   other elements that were normally associated with the production of spells and   evil deeds: neighbors and, especially, certain categories of women.</p>     <p>At first,   people speculated about Jos&eacute;'s neighbor, from whom he had bought the land on   which he built his house. This neighbor had only sold him the land due to the   pressure of his children. When Jos&eacute; was building his house, he found evidence   of a spell buried in the lot and suspected it had been made by his neighbor, who   was unsatisfied with the sale. Also, and still according to this version, Jos&eacute;   would also have made a fatal mistake: he organized a party to open his house   and did not invite that neighbor. This was considered as a breaking up of the rules   that establish good relations within a neighborhood. Whether caused by oblivion   or a deliberate attitude taken by an individualistic person who was little   attentive to the requirements of the "traditional" universe (which he   frequently disdained), Jos&eacute; had certainly created a tense plight with his   neighbor and this provided the basis for the rumors that followed.</p>     <p>Other   versions attributed his disease to a universe of "traditional diseases"   associated with certain taboos. A young woman who was the daughter of a <i>curandeira </i>told me she suspected that Jos&eacute; suffered from a disease called <i>xivenze</i>,   which affects people who, after the death of a relative, have sexual   intercourse or take possession of the deceased person's goods before the <i>kutchinga</i> is carried out.<a href="#_ftn10" name="_ftnref10"><sup>8</sup></a> According to her, Jos&eacute; might have disrespected the sexual abstinence period   after the death of his son, or might have eaten meat of some domestic animal   that belonged to someone that had died recently and were not previously   purified.</p>     <p>One of Jos&eacute;'s   friends raised some hypotheses related to sexual taboos and certain women. Firstly,   Jos&eacute; could have had sexual intercourse with some widow who had not been   submitted to the <i>kutchinga</i>, which repeated the suspicion around the <i>xivenze.</i> In the second hypothesis, Jos&eacute; might have had sexual intercourse with a woman   who had an abortion and had not been submitted to purification rites. Finally, Dalva   was suspected to be an "owner's wife", whose "owner" was a spirit. Widows and   "wives of spirits" are defined by a similar principle: they have an "owner",   that is, they have a matrimonial alliance with a man (even if he is the spirit   of someone deceased), and access to them requires the permission of their   "owners" through traditional ceremonies - in the case of widows, the   requirements involve the <i>kutchinga </i>and the respect to a one-year period   before they can have sexual intercourse with another man. Jos&eacute;'s friend saw greater   plausibility in the third hypothesis, since two of his cousins got sick like   Jos&eacute; after marrying "spirit's wives", lost their young children and almost died   themselves.</p>     <p>On the day after   the funeral I paid a visit of condolence to the family, as I already knew that   there was a consensus in the family and among the inhabitants of the village   that Jos&eacute;'s father was guilty of his death. When I arrived I met Dalva with her   mother and some women from Jos&eacute;'s family (her sister-in-law and Jos&eacute;'s father's   wives). Jos&eacute;'s father was sitting at a table to welcome the visitors and I sat   down next to him. I wanted to know his version for his son's death and so I   took the risk of asking him. Then he answered that Jos&eacute; had fallen as victim of   "traditional things". He argued that he had done everything he could to save   his son, but it had not been enough. I took the risk again and asked him what   the most specific cause for the death could have been in "traditional" terms,   or <i>who</i> could have done that. He told me that Jos&eacute; "got involved   with a whore" <a href="#_ftn11" name="_ftnref11"><sup>9</sup></a> when Dalva was traveling. When he went back home, he became ill and died. Then,   in a tone of complicity, he looked at me and said in a low pitch: "we, men, are   in a bad fix with things of tradition, because women are evil". And he repeated   it once more, emphatically: <b>"Women are evil!"</b> </p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Some months   later I met Francisco, one of Jos&eacute;'s brothers (from the same father and   mother), who lives and works in Maputo. He had moved to the country capital   after better job opportunities, but also to stay away from the "traditional"   universe and its dangers. Francisco told me that the last healer they visited   got to a diagnosis that his family accepted: The sequence of deaths in the   family was due to the fact that his father had gotten married with a "spirit's   wife" (Jos&eacute;'s mother) and refused to yield the ox that her "owner" demanded to   allow the wedding. Therefore, the successive deaths among his father's   descendents were due to this spirit's vengeance. The family then condemned   Jos&eacute;'s father for not paying off his spiritual debt, risking all of them. His   wife - the source of all evil deeds - carried with her the vengeance of her   spiritual "owner" against the family.</p>     <p>These   versions on the causes of the evil that victimized Jos&eacute; became more plausible   as all of them made use of a consensus socially available in Southern   Mozambique. According to it, there is a universe of evil deeds and spells that   cause damages, diseases, and deaths among their peers which are attributed to   women. I heard in Homo&iacute;ne that the great majority of sorcerers and <i>curandeiros</i> are women, a fact that associates them with spiritual powers and damages that   afflict both men and women. Thus it is a consensus that women have a certain   type of power and carry out a certain type of violence related to spiritual   forces or impurity. This submits them to a regime of constant suspicion and   violence, conceived of as a form of counter-violence. It is this aspect of a reality   that articulates personhood, gender, and diseases, that I analyze on the   following pages.</p>     <p><b>Tradition</b></p>     <p>The universe   of "traditional diseases" in Homo&iacute;ne is closely related to the construction of   the personhood and the structuring of gender relations. However, understanding   this universe requires the understanding of how people think of and deal with the   supposed dichotomy between "tradition" and "modernity" in that reality. </p>     <p>When a   disease is classified as "traditional", it is presumed to be inserted in a   specific field of causes, consequences, and proper procedures to treat it. The   definition of a disease is always preceded by a speculative process that   includes a large number of variables involving particularly its symptoms and   development, and it is concluded with the diagnosis obtained from a <i>curandeiro</i> who uses the <i>tihlolo </i>to determine its causes.</p>     <p>A   "traditional disease" is usually one whose development is considered to be   atypical because of its protraction or recurrence, for the rapidness with which   symptoms lead to death, or for the set of multiple symptoms and signals in the   body which are also articulated with problems that are not related to one's   body (low productivity of <i>machambas</i>, disease and death among relatives,   for example). However, a "traditional" cause may be imputed to any disease,   even to those with a typical development and known to be treatable with   biomedicine. The "traditional" diagnosis includes a revision of the   relationships that the ill person established with his/her social and physical   environment in order to find in these relationships the potential causes of a   disease. The causes of "traditional diseases" tend to be referred to one <b><i>who</i></b>,   as demonstrated by Alf Helgesson (1971) in his study on the Vatswa, the   majority group in the District of Homo&iacute;ne.  Hence it follows that every   "traditional disease" tends to be considered as a result of personal   interactions and somebody else's action on one's body. That is why I asked   Jos&eacute;'s father about <b><i>who</i></b> could have produced the cause of his   illness.</p>     <p>Even in a   social environment of available "modernity", as it was the case in the village of Homo&iacute;ne, where there is easy access to state apparatus and urban resources,   "tradition" is always a potential cause of diseases and this diagnosis is not   necessarily abandoned when a disease is treated and cured with biomedicine. A   disease may be treated simultaneously through biomedicine and traditional   healing, and this joint procedure is not perceived by the subjects as a   contradiction. But this does not mean that people in Homo&iacute;ne do not acknowledge   any type of specificity in the diseases and treatments defined as "traditional"   or "non-traditional" even in the case of joint treatments, as they acknowledge   the existence of distinct fields that they identify as "tradition" and   "modernity".</p>     <p>The   inhabitants of the main village refer constantly to traditional healing, sorcery,   "traditional power", family, ancestors, rites, and "traditional ceremonies" as   data which refer to a universe they call "African tradition" or "Africanism",   discursively delimited by expressions such as "in those times", "in those   areas", and "those people". That is, from the perspective of discourse, the   inhabitants of Homo&iacute;ne operate <b>emically</b> in a dichotomic register that   refers "tradition" to another time (always remote), to another space (always   distant), and to another social universe (always different), establishing by   opposition the field of "modernity" as that one they more clearly experience in   the main village - the urban character of which is perceived as closer to   "modern" life. Discursive fields are thus created and constitute different   subjects, temporalities, and places that may even be contradictory among   themselves, establishing very well delimited alterities. This allows them to   identify, classify, hierarchize, systematize and deal with a multiple set of   objective and discursive data that interpenetrate randomly in the practice of   daily life. Thus the village provides a space of "modernity" that is   conceivable, perceptible, comfortable, and safe, as opposed to "tradition",   which would be restricted to the <i>campo</i> (countryside) or <i>mato </i>(bush) <i>- </i>expressions used to refer to the universes of "those areas", in which   "those people" still live as they did "in those times". Thereby a binary   taxonomy of perceived transformations and permanencies is created, and this is   how one may observe the functionality and effectiveness of the discursive   strategies applied in the construction of "tradition" and "modernity" in the   main village is observed. This taxonomy is constantly updated in discourses and   performances<a href="#_ftn12" name="_ftnref12"><sup>10</sup></a> that appropriate certain signs recognized as "modern" (clothing, vocabulary,   corporality, consumption, etc.) in order to establish frontiers and ruptures   with the universe of the <i>campo</i> or <i>mato</i>.</p>     <p>The field   perceived as "modernity" is also closely related to the universe of the market   and of the State and its apparatus (hospitals, courts, schools, public   departments, stores, <i>bancas</i>, and <i>barracas</i><a href="#_ftn13" name="_ftnref13"><sup>11</sup></a>), where performances, discourses,   and negotiations take place by using elements that the consensus recognizes as   pertaining to a "modern" and urban universe - it is in the main village that people   recognize the existence of these elements in a more constant and settled form   in Homo&iacute;ne. "Tradition," in turn, is where the State and its institutions do   not exist, are precariously established, or subordinated to "traditional"   institutions - this is the place of <i>campo</i> and <i>mato</i>. Finally, at   the level of a discursive taxonomy, what is intended to be "modern" in Homo&iacute;ne   refers to an urban universe, and what refers to a rural universe is what is   intended to be delimited as "traditional." </p>    <p>However, in   the case of critical events such as disease and death, what is observed is a pragmatic   deconstruction of this discursiveness and performativity, when the lives of the   inhabitants are invaded by "tradition" - also due to the fact that they   perceive themselves as vulnerable to it because the majority of them either   come from the <i>campo</i> or are in permanent relation with it through their   relatives and <i>machambas</i>. Such events implode social taxonomies that   delimit the "modern" and "traditional" universes and unleash a set of actions   that disrupts any clear frontier intended to exist between them. These events   amalgamate the institutions of "modernity" and "tradition" and establish   continuities - from the hospital to the <i>curandeiro</i> and vice-versa, which   does not lead to ruptures, but to a process of pragmatic continuity. What is   then revealed is the unreal and fragile character of these fields and frontiers,   composed of excluding and contradictory alterities, well-defined only at the   level of discourse. Therefore, to consider the variables that constitute social   dramas in Homo&iacute;ne, one should at least question the operationality of any   analysis that affirms a clear and evident separation between "tradition" and   "modernity" in processes related to disease and death, as well as such separation   on other levels of the social universe and interpersonal relations.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>In this   sense, in contexts such as the one in Homo&iacute;ne, it shows to be more productive trying   to understand the forms of sociality from the logic, ontologies, and   cosmologies that produce them, what makes it necessary to face issues of sorcery, <i>curandeirismo</i>, kinship, and other categories said to be "traditional,"   which become part of the routine and are indisputably contemporary to that   social reality. It is necessary to take seriously the discourses on local   "traditions", as they operate with cosmological and ontological   systematizations that revert into a pragmatism that constructs particular   social worlds<a href="#_ftn14" name="_ftnref14"><sup>12</sup></a> that cannot be reduced into anything but themselves, imposing "traditional" forces   as a reality experienced by the subjects and reverberating in relationships   with the institutionalized fields of "modernity".        My hypothesis is that   therein lays the key for understanding such complex universes which resist to   dichotomic analyses, such as the one I found in Homo&iacute;ne.</p>     <p><b>Personhood and risk</b></p>     <p>Speaking of   ontologies also means to speak of the notions of personhood. The anthropology   literature on the sociocultural life in Southern Mozambique demonstrates the   central character of kinship and family structures in the constitution of   subjects and sociocultural systems. From Henri A. Junod to Alcinda Honwana,   including David Webster and Brigitte Bagnol - to mention some of the authors   with whom a dialogue is to be established here -, we find a series of studies   that indicate the need to understand the forms of alliance and descent in order   to explain the logic of sociocultural systems, as well as the individualities   that arise from them, for they operate and build the realities observed in Homo&iacute;ne.</p>     <p>These authors   indicate, in different ways and in other terms, that in order to understand the   subject in Southern Mozambique it is necessary to consider the fact that a   particular ontology and personhood operate in that area, and that these remain   as the basis of the relations between these subjects and the world, even after   important and critical historical transformations, and in spite of the constant   incorporation of new sociocultural elements. What remains is neither a set of   sedimented "uses and customs", nor rigid structures<a href="#_ftn15" name="_ftnref15"><sup>13</sup></a>, but a set of logical,   cosmological, and ontological principles that are present in the forms of   alliance and descent that found subjects and their reality, structure the   relationships between the living and the dead, and between the latter and a   certain notion of nature. These principles are constantly reaffirmed and, to a   great extent, allow us to understand how relations concerning gender and   diseases are pragmatically established in a context of profound and constant   transformations.</p>     <p>In Homo&iacute;ne I   came across some facts that indicated a certain pattern of construction of the   personhood that is founded in the relationships among peers. Roughly speaking,   the person is partly defined by descent relationships, as a person must be in a   constant relation with ancestors, <i>madodas</i><a href="#_ftn16" name="_ftnref16"><sup>14</sup></a>, parents, siblings, children   and grandchildren, who are defined by agnatic as well as matrilateral relationships.   A person is incomplete if he/she is disconnected from a group of ascendants and   has not produced any descendants. Concerning alliances and matrilateral kin, a   person is incomplete if he/she has not married, has no <i>sograria</i><a href="#_ftn17" name="_ftnref17"><sup>15</sup></a> (term used to refer to the   family group of one's husbands or wives) and does not have any sons- or   daughters-in-law, and the affines established through them. At a broader level,   alliances are extended to non-familial forms, such as neighbors and <i>xar&aacute;s</i><a href="#_ftn18" name="_ftnref18"><sup>16</sup></a> (when the latter are not men   and women from the family from which the name was inherited), in addition to   churches, circles of more or less formal friends, and work relations. This set   of relationships defines a person in Homo&iacute;ne, and the construction of this   network is one's main investment to define one's social existence, as described   by David Webster (1976) among the Chopi. My restriction to Webster arguments is   that the person constituted in such a situation is not a Weberian type of   individual, but a subject closer to the dividual pattern found by Marilyn   Strathern (1988) in Melanesia.</p>     <p>This set of   relations describes a life path as well as the accumulation of social capital   by the person that, after his/her death, will define his/her status in the   world of spirits, as well as the type of relationship between him/her and the   living. It is this accumulated social capital that defines the "great man" <a href="#_ftn19" name="_ftnref19"><sup>17</sup></a> in life and will be   transferred to his existence as an ancestor. This is not different in the case   of women, although they are respected mainly for the descendants they have   helped to generate and for the success of their <i>machambas</i>, being   inseparable from a "great man" whose wife, mother, or relative they were - usually   referred to their husbands and his agnatic group, or to the agnatic group they   come from. Thus we have in Homo&iacute;ne a process of construction of the personhood   that is very similar to that described by the Comaroffs (2001) among the Tswana   and defined by them as a being-in-process<i>.</i> The person is a project that   is accomplished when he/she becomes an ancestor who is remembered and respected   by his/her descendants, whose function is to protect his/her family group and to   intervene when the prescribed order is broken by one of its members or by the   action of extra familial elements. This allows to the ancestor having his name   preserved by his family and subsequently attributed to its descendants,   establishing a form of return and permanence in family and social life - this   mechanism of nomination is another modality of the <i>xar&aacute;</i> observed in Homo&iacute;ne,   and involves both male and female names. Likewise, the ancestor must also be remembered   by his neighbors and by his broader community as someone who produced   respectable alliances and broad relations, extending his influence and power   beyond his core of descendants. The name and the lands which are expanded as   the "great man" expands himself through his descent and alliances become   inseparable from his person. Those who inherit them also inherit his socially   acknowledged "greatness". Names are keys that open certain doors, so to speak,   and they are defined by descent and alliances. Thus, by acknowledging some   transformations produced by historical incorporations, what we observe in the   construction of the person is a scheme that is still very similar to that one observed   and described by Henri Junod (2003) concerning the life of an individual at the   end of the 19<sup>th</sup> century.</p>     <p>This seems to   be the reason for the persistence of a pragmatism said to be "traditional" in a   social environment that incorporates "modernity", as described previously: in   the context of a certain "modernity" in Homo&iacute;ne, the person still construct himself/herself   according to the logic of a persistent and encompassing ontology, manipulating different   signs to produce socialities in which that person can recognize himself/herself   and be recognized by his/her peers. Although components classed as "modern" may   be observed acting on reality, such reality is constructed by the "traditional"   person, who recomposes his/her ontology from an apparently promiscuous mixture   of "traditional" and "modern" signs. Hence, the social reality is permanently   reconstructed by the logic of construction of the personhood by manipulating   "traditional" and "modern" elements, which does not require the persistence of   specific "uses and customs." </p>    <p>The person is   not defined by the materiality and objectivity of "uses and customs" in   themselves, but by how he/she orders, reorders, invents, and reinvents them,   recomposing through this performativity of multiple elements an ontological and   pragmatic unit that is coherent with the presuppositions and principles that   define him/her and the reality that he/she recognizes. In view of this reality,   an analysis focused on the presupposition of duality, contradiction, and   complementarity between "tradition" and "modernity" would not be appropriate just   because one observe the mere presence of elements externally classified as   "traditional" and "modern". At the pragmatic level, subjects do not   differentiate them - except <i>a posteriori</i>, when they impose this taxonomy   on themselves as a discursive need to delimit fields of experience and   knowledge they want to circumscribe. Therefore, what matters is what is done   with these elements and what they refer to for the subjects that manipulate   them. I have watched some ceremonies identified by the subjects of my research   as "traditional":  <i>mhambas</i>, <i>lobolos</i>, funerals, and depositions of   flowers<a href="#_ftn20" name="_ftnref20"><sup>18</sup></a>.   They were all pervaded by "modern" elements, as were the <i>lobolos</i> observed by Brigitte Bagnol (2006). However, these elements were there only as distinguishing   markers of a certain urban status of the participants and were not perceived as   anachronistic and contradictory with the "traditional" character experienced in   those ceremonies. Therefore, they reaffirm what Bagnol indicates regarding the <i>lobolo</i>:   these ceremonies are of an ontological character and thus restate and reaffirm   principles of the construction of worlds and persons that are based on   persistent foundations related to kinship and cosmology. That is why they make   explicit some crucial aspects to be discussed here.</p>     <p>During a <i>mhamba</i> I watched in July 2007 in Homo&iacute;ne, carried out by a family that was reconstructed after the massacre of 1987<a href="#_ftn21" name="_ftnref21"><sup>19</sup></a>, I asked the head of the household   whether the <i>curandeira</i> that mediated the consultation with ancestors was   an inhabitant of that area. He was astounded with my question and denied it   vehemently. He said they could never hire a <i>curandeira</i> who lived close   to the family or was acquainted with them. Putting her into contact with the protecting   ancestors would be a great risk, as she could break their protection and   trigger evil deeds against the family. This indicates something that I noticed   as something generalized in that field: evil deeds do not come from far away,   but from very close - from the family group, from neighbors, and more rarely,   from the other social circles and networks in which people are inserted. The   case of Jos&eacute;'s disease and death makes it explicit. The fields of sociality   which offer more potential of aggression and risk are always those which are   closer to the subjects. It is as if relatives and neighbors were permanent   potential enemies, and it is precisely for this reason that most of the   accusations of sorcery and preventive attitudes are directed towards them. And   there are many accusations of sorcery in Homo&iacute;ne.</p>     <p>Throughout my   research, I found a social environment in which people are afraid of each other   and express this in the form of reciprocal discourses and acts. This fear is   usually expressed in conversations about violence unleashed by spells or by   actions of <i>bandidos</i> (bandits) - this is how criminals are named, who   usually steal small things but also commit physical aggression and eventually   kill someone. There are discourses about a real or presumed violence and there   is a social environment of insecurity that results from the perception of a   permanent vulnerability to the actions of <i>bandidos</i> and sorcerers who,   although different in categories and processes, operate in a similar way in the   construction of fear and suspicion. What unites these categories is the notion   of ambition, perceived as the motivation of their actions. But discourses are   expressed differently: when they refer to <i>bandidagem</i> (banditry), people   speak objectively, directly, and explicitly; when they refer to sorcery, this   is done with half words and ellipses, in a fragmented way, as rumors. While <i>bandidagem</i> threatens goods, houses, and bodies through direct actions, imposing preventive   and punitive measures which are also direct and objective against their agents,   sorcery, on the other hand, threatens the same elements and expands them to the   family and to other circles of personal and social relations by means of   indirect, capillary, silent actions, making it more difficult to identify,   prevent, and punish, and rendering them as the cause of most "traditional   diseases". This rhizomatic<a href="#_ftn22" name="_ftnref22"><sup>20</sup></a> nature of agency turns sorcery into a more diffuse and amplified, less   objective and punctual element than <i>bandidagem</i> and, therefore, more   fearful.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>In a small   community as is the main village of Homo&iacute;ne, where everybody knows each other   or may be found through the intermingling social networks, it is very easy to   identify those responsible for acts of <i>bandidagem</i>, engage in prevention   against them and punish them by formal methods. On the other hand, actions and   evil deeds attributed to sorcery, which have an occult character, tend to   trigger continued processes that affect people not always predictable, and are   the object of speculation concerning their diagnosis and the agent responsible   for them. Besides that, there is no formal judicial instance to punish sorcery   except for resorting to AMETRAMO.<a href="#_ftn23" name="_ftnref23"><sup>21</sup></a> In addition to search for <i>curandeiros</i>, people resort to banning the sorcerers   or counterstriking the evil deeds, which restores the scheme of predation and   counter predation involved in sorcery. This creates an ascending spiral of   insecurity and presumed violence.</p>     <p>In the   speeches about violence that I heard in Homo&iacute;ne, sorcery was closer to the   descriptions of unpredictable attacks by <i>matsangas</i><a href="#_ftn24" name="_ftnref24"><sup>22</sup></a> (RENAMO'S <i>bandidos armados</i>)   than to the current <i>bandidagem</i>, despite the noticeable connections that   these speeches produce between war, criminality, and sorcery as violence - the   speeches on these themes were very similar structurally. The indetermination of   sorcery, always inserted in a speculative field of obscure causes and   consequences, continued and non-structured processes, lends it a character of greater   power and danger than that recognized in the contemporary <i>bandidagem</i>, and   much closer to the assigned to <i>matsangas</i><a href="#_ftn25" name="_ftnref25"><sup>23</sup></a><i>.</i> It is important to   point out that sorcery was associated with representations of violence during   the civil war.<a href="#_ftn26" name="_ftnref26"><sup>24</sup></a> Sorcery renders a form and an expression to a diffuse and permanent insecurity   in view of the dangers, unpredictable events and imponderabilia of daily life   that put people in risk.</p>     <p>Another   aspect that causes insecurity and triggers speeches on an imminent threat of   deconstruction of the person concerns the management by ancestors of the   individual and family life as well as of nature. Protectors on the one hand, the ancestors are also object of anxiety for the people, since their discontent results in punishment for the living. Breaks in   family and kinship bonds, disobedience to rules, taboos, and disrespect to the   natural elements under their guard revert into evil deeds for the living. Owners   of the land and of the natural cycles and elements, ancestors are also owners   of certain women, who are given to them as wives - a fact that has been   previously mentioned and has also been described and analyzed by Honwana (2002)   and Bagnol (2006). This was part of the speculations concerning Jos&eacute;'s disease.   Access to these elements and people require the authorization of ancestors. Inadequate   use of their belongings and the failure to follow their orders result in   punishment. Protectors at first, ancestors frequently transform their   descendants into enemies in a given sense, and as a consequence they also   become enemies and predators of their descent.</p>     <p>Still   regarding the social predation scheme observed in Homo&iacute;ne, I found a remarkable   equivalence and even an indistinction between <i>curandeiros</i> and sorcerers   for people in the village. Instead of integrators - as Honwana (2002) describes   -, the inhabitants of the village see <i>curandeiros</i> as potential   disintegrators of the social life and of the personhood. As disintegrators as the sorcerers,   and the more frequently the closer they are to the   village   -   from this perspective, to the local inhabitants, <i>curandeiros</i> from the <i>mato</i> would still heal and would not produce evil deeds. People speak of <i>curandeiros</i> that produce evil deeds, carry on intrigues among relatives and neighbors, turn   their clients into slaves because of interminable and unpayable debts, and are   consulted in order to cast spells to the benefit of their "ambitious" clients. <i>Curandeiros</i> are accessible only to those who have belongings, for consulting them is   expensive, which constitutes a phenomenon of social class in Homo&iacute;ne. Those who   do not have any belongings, besides seeking shelter against <i>curandeiros</i> and their "ambitious" clients in churches, also flea to larger urban centers,   where they feel less vulnerable to "tradition" and away from family conflicts   that may lead to evil deeds. Noticeably women seek churches to protect   themselves against evil deeds and accusations of being sorcerers.</p>     <p>Consulting   with <i>curandeiros</i> is considered a way to obtain benefits for social   climbing and capital gains in a labor market that is extremely competitive   because of the extremely low job offer.<a href="#_ftn27" name="_ftnref27"><sup>25</sup></a> This search for benefits is even expressed by a specific verb: <i>kukhendla</i>,   in Citswa - in Portuguese, the verb becomes a neologism: <i>khendlar.</i> <i>Kukhendla </i>traditionally means to look for magical powers produced by <i>curandeiros</i> in order to obtain goods, physical force, defense against enemies, and personal   qualities that make the person socially well-considered and positioned. During   the civil war, soldiers used <i>kukhendla</i> to obtain protection against the   weapons of their enemies. Today, in times of peace and free market, the demand switched   to the obtaining of job and material benefits, and the availability of money in   circulation causes inflation in the prices of <i>curandeiros</i>. Therefore, a   constant historical updating of this phenomenon is observed.</p>     <p>For the <i>kukhendla </i>to be effective and lasting it requires the sacrifice of animals and people   death in return - people that are usually part of the family. The spirits of   the dead are given to the <i>curandeiros</i>, who use them to increase their   own powers. <i>Kukhendla </i>is one of the phenomena associated with the   current notion of spell I found in Homo&iacute;ne, and it is the main element in the   construction of the equivalence between <i>curandeirismo</i> and sorcery   expressed in its inhabitants' speeches. Moreover, it is the explanatory   principle of several of the accusations addressed to Jos&eacute;'s father. The current   demand for <i>curandeiros</i> in the village has gone from healing to obtaining   personal benefits connected with the requirements of a "modern" life. Meneses (2004)   had already mentioned that the afflictions of "modernity" referred to in the   market eventually promote the search for benefits with <i>curandeiros</i>. In   Homo&iacute;ne, the consequences of this search were made explicit in the subjects'   speeches: the benefit of some requires the harm to others, which results in generalized   insecurity and suspicion concerning those who are successful in their lives. <i>Curandeirismo</i> is thus referred to in the field of discourse on violence against the person. While   the search for well-being and success results from the very process of   construction of the person, this process happens in a constant experience of   potential risks and dangers, involving permanent disputes and negotiations with   elements that may hamper its accomplishment.</p>     <p>In the fields   defined by descent and matrimonial alliances, there is a recurrence of   accusations of deconstruction of a person due to casting spells, as exemplified   in Jos&eacute;'s case. In most cases, women are accused of causing tension, diseases,   and deaths among their affines and descendants. This articulation between the   construction of the person, the action of women inside the family core, and the   production of diseases will be discussed further ahead.</p>     <p>All these   phenomena concerning the construction of the person and the risks of its deconstruction   may be interpreted from a common standpoint that allows us to understand them   from the perspective of an analysis used contemporarily in studies of   Amerindian groups.<a href="#_ftn28" name="_ftnref28"><sup>26</sup></a> All these facts indicate that the social system at issue is based on the   conflict that certain social mechanisms aim to pacify. In this sense, the   conflicts unleashed or represented by sorcery, <i>bandidagem</i>, <i>matsangas</i>, <i>curandeirismo</i>, and ancestors are not anomic disruptions of a social   order that is functional and harmonious by principle. The conflict is a   permanent possibility of this very social order. This order is constructed   based on the acknowledgement of the conflict and predation as permanent and   virtual foundations of relationships with primordial enemies whose origin date   back to the pre-colonial wars for occupation of that area (cf.  Passador,   2009b), which requires mechanisms and process of constant pacification through   socialities that produce people and social networks. In this case, it is   possible to rethink the kinship system in the investigated area and the   alliances that extend beyond that system, assuming that they operate as a   matrix of permanent and systematic pacification of potential enemies inserted   in the fields of relations that constitute the person. Social networks create   fields of relations in permanent risk of deconstruction of the pacification   processes that constructed them. The enemy is not an element constructed by a   punctual conflict that disrupts previous orders of solidarity. They arise from   the deconstruction of the relations that had pacified them when they were   introduced into fields of socialities under a regime of hierarchical power. Therefore,   the social construction of enemies takes place through their ontological   replacement, by deconstructing a field of agencies and socialities intended to   pacify them. This explains why the enemy is always very close and why   accusations of sorcery are usually addressed to relatives and neighbors -   especially women. The example of Jos&eacute;'s case and the speculations around his   disease and death may be understood according to the terms of this proposition.</p>     <p>More   objectively, the proposal here is to think of matrimonial alliances in that   area as mechanisms for the incorporation and pacification of potential enemies   in a core of descendants that has already been pacified by an agnatic   hierarchy. The perpetuation of a system of agnatic descent requires the   incorporation of women and affines by means of matrimonial alliances. Women and   affines come from the outside, from another descent group, as <i>foreigners </i>or <i>vientes</i><a href="#_ftn29" name="_ftnref29"><sup>27</sup></a> - expressions used indistinctly in Homo&iacute;ne to refer subjects that come from outside   a certain universe considered to be the "inside". <i>Vientes</i> are always   subject to suspicion and fear, for they are - by principle - potential enemies   that require pacification. These "outside" elements, women and affines   incorporated by alliance, are the ones that cause the most fears of aggression   and deconstruction of a person.</p>     <p>On the other   hand, alliances and pacifications operated by ascendants can be interrupted by   their descents by interrupting the investments of the person that started the   descent core. Ascendants, on their turn, due to their generational position in   the hierarchy, may punish insubordinate descendants and subject them to their   interests and ambitions - which is the case in the relation between Jos&eacute; and   his father, as well as in the more general case of punishment by ancestors. Thus,   women and affines are potential enemies, as well as ascendants and descendants.   This is the reason for constant ambiguity in kinship relations: if the person   is constructed in a network of relations of alliance and descent, there is also   a great potential of predation and deconstruction of the person by the same   relations.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>In a scheme   of alliances that are extended to non-familial spheres, such as neighbors, the   same logic is observed: neighbors, aggregated by alliances, are allies, but   also potential enemies because they are <i>vientes</i> who have been   incorporated and pacified from the outside to the inside. The version that   accused the neighbor of producing Jos&eacute;'s disease is based on this logic.</p>     <p>The result of   all these is a social matrix that operates through reciprocal and solidary   exchanges, and depends on a hierarchic power to be preserved, as their agents   are basically pacified enemies that may potentially return to their original   predatory condition. This is how the person is constructed and deconstructed,   and this is how health, disease, and death by sorcery may be understood in   terms of the "traditional" system, as in the case of Jos&eacute;'s death.</p>     <p><b>Gender, power, and   disease</b></p>     <p>If this   interpretation is correct, then we have a pathway to understand the relations   of gender and generation that pervade this matrix and that turn into recurrent   conflicts associated with women and elders - especially older women. In   Homo&iacute;ne, women are feared because people believe they have power to cause ruptures,   produce aggressions, and disintegrate sociality fields. Therefore, they are   potential enemies submitted to constant procedures carried out to prevent evils   as well as to hierarchical pacification on the part of men. As they always come   from the outside in the matrimonial alliances scheme, they remain as <i>vientes</i>,   potential enemies, just as their family group of origin - the affines. Hence,   the power to which they are submitted in this matrix operates as a male   counter-power that seeks to invalidate the evils they may cause in the universe   of the family. This is necessary for the construction of the male person,   because descent, alliances, and masculinity are not possible without women.  But   that is not all.</p>     <p>Women are   seen as having a power of ambiguous and specific nature. As they are the sorcerers   and <i>curandeiras</i>, they are the ones who have a special relationship with   the world of the spirits and the capacity to make them act on the world of the   living. When they are <i>curandeiras</i>, they are the ones who enable the   agencies of spirits in social life, and this makes them vital to the   integration and maintenance of a desirable order. When they are mothers and   wives, they make descent and alliances possible. Therefore, they stand as the   possibility of constructing persons. But they are also the ones who cast spells   on relatives and neighbors and carry on intrigues and conflicts as <i>curandeiras</i>,   deconstructing persons. This ambiguous power results from the very position   they have in local schemes of descent and alliances, for these mechanisms   operate through them and in them.</p>     <p>Strathern (1988)   stated that the ideal relations of alliances between men, to which she refers   as same-sex relations, are possible only through actual relations of alliance   between men and women, or cross-sex relations. The relationship of virtual and   potential affinity between family groups headed by men can only be accomplished   in concrete terms through the matrimonial alliances between men and women from   these groups. Thus, women are the ones vested with potential to establish and ratify   alliances.</p>     <p>The same   phenomenon is observed at the level of spirits and <i>curandeirismo</i>. Honwana   states that the <i>nyamussoro</i><a href="#_ftn30" name="_ftnref30"><sup>28</sup></a> is originally a Vandau's category, from Central Mozambique, and this was an   extremely women-only category among that group, that was later redesigned in   the Southern region as a result of the pre-colonial wars. When we pay attention   to the author's description of the emergence of this category in Southern   Mozambique, we notice that it is only possible when constituted by women and   their role in descents and alliances: the incorporation of male Vanguni and   Vandau spirits to Tsonga groups occurred through cross-sex alliances between   these spirits and the women given to them as wives (the <i>nsati wa svikwembo</i>),   turning them into affines and transmitting them by descent to the next   generations - which allowed men to become <i>vanyamussoro </i>at a later moment   through the transmission and possession of spirits of their female <i>vanyamussoro </i>ancestors. Thus the power of healing is guaranteed by the power of   establishing matrimonial alliances, incorporating spirits who become affines of   a descent group. This is a female power and turns the <i>nyamussoro</i> into an   originally female category by definition. This incorporation of spirits takes   place through pacification processes, for before becoming healing spirits, they   were warrior, revengeful spirits who made a group of agnatic descent   vulnerable. Hence, there is a parallel between alliance and pacification and   the family field appears as a field that is defined and produced by strategies   to pacify potential enemies from the outside to the inside, and this can only   be accomplished through women in cross-sex relations.</p>     <p>These facts once   again point out the ambiguity of the female situation in Southern Mozambique: as   integrators and pacifiers, women remain as <i>vientes</i> that are incorporated   and pacified through matrimonial alliance in order to make descent possible in   a group to which they do not originally belong. On the one hand, they   intermediate male spiritual forces and reproductive forces that make possible   the existence of a person by means of descents and alliances. On the other   hand, they remain as potential enemies that can break the peace agreement that   the alliance establishes. This situation gives them the acknowledged and feared   power. Male power becomes effective only through the female power, for the   latter guarantees the male agency in the social and spiritual fields. However,   the female power can also cause disruptions and conflicts that hinder the   maintenance of an order governed by male elements. This is the type of ontological   female power to which accusations of sorcery addressed at women try to give   form and intelligibility in the social universe observed, and the one that   creates fear of women and the diseases they can produce.</p>     <p>Many are the   cases of women accused of sorcery in Homo&iacute;ne. Among these many cases, there are   cases of spells cast by mothers-in-law against their daughters-in-law, which   indicates that gender and generation operate to delimitate the most predatory   categories - and their vulnerability to accusations. An objective indicator of   this situation was the existence of a group of approximately 30 old women   living in the Catholic mission close to the village and known by the local   population as the "mission's old women". According to the missionaries who gave   them shelter, those "old women" had been expelled from home by their own   children after having been accused of sorcery by their daughters-in-law. Their   daughters-in-law accused them of being responsible for their being infertile,   of causing diseases and death of their babies, or of causing decrease of   productivity in their <i>machambas</i>. This is to say, accusations refer to   the incapability of daughters-in-law to generate descent and produce subsistence   for their husbands, and therefore fail to comply with the alliance agreement   established in the <i>lobolo.</i></p>     <p>This tension   between daughters- and mothers-in-law seems to be a structural datum: if   daughters-in-law do not produce children and descendants, they become   unsuccessful women and incomplete persons. As a consequence, they cannot make   their husbands complete as a male person. The same logic applies to their <i>machambas</i>:   if daughters-in-law cannot guarantee the subsistence of the family group, they   become unsuccessful and incomplete women. When daughters-in-law are unsuccessful,   the marriage is usually disrupted, they are returned to their family of origin   along with the goods negotiated in the <i>lobolo</i>. On their turn,   mothers-in-law reiterate their presence in the group to which they were   incorporated when they got married and reaffirm their ascent on their sons. Sharing   the domestic space with the daughters-in-law in the general scheme of virilocal   residence, preferably patrilocal residence, the mothers-in-law submit their daughters-in-law   to a hierarchical power relationship. The tensions between them are notorious   and their roots seem to be the women's constant need to reaffirm their membership   and subordination to the agnatic group to which they have been incorporated by   alliance, and to which they remain legitimately connected only if they   guarantee its continuity through descent and subsistence - children and food   are the fundamental goods women are supposed to produce. Disruptions in descent   and subsistence turn them into the main suspects of causing them.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Still in the   circuit of accusations among women, there are remarkable accusations of women   that kill other women's children through spells - which is very common in polygynic   cores, but also among neighbors and relatives. Another way to damage a woman is   to kill her children, as a woman is only socially constructed by the generation   of descent. The "mission's old women" were also in permanent conflict among   themselves, and accused each other of casting spells on each other. It is a   cycle of accusations between women that seems to be endless, transforming   supposed offenders into actual victims, and again into presumed offenders.</p>     <p>Another example   that associates women with evil deeds inside their own circuit of descent and   alliances is the also common accusation of spells made by wives against their   husbands in order to benefit from the family properties that he belongs. Every   widow knows she will be a suspect of having caused the death of her husband. The   foundation for this type of accusation is that wives, moved by ambition, would   take advantage of their influence on their children to benefit from the   inheritance entitled to them after the death of their father, in a scheme of   adelphic succession. Sorcery appears here as a possibility to make intelligible   and give form to the causes of the problems related to predation within the   family group, problems which are usually attributed to women incorporated by   alliance and affinity.</p>     <p>It is   believed that when women get old, are no longer fertile and have lower   productivity in their <i>machambas</i>, they become sorcerers in order to make   their living and obtain benefits, a fact that cause husbands to fear their old   wives. Old and lonely wives are always much feared and accused of being sorcerers,   for their only way to make a living would be ambition and predation.</p>     <p>Women are   always seen as being potentially evil: by means of supposed voluntary evil   deeds created through sorcery, they would put women and men in risk for   believing that these may also put their integrity as a person at risk. This is   the reason why women are a permanent object of fear and suspicion. More than   structural or functional, this recognition of evil as inherent to women -   particularly older ones, but not only - assumes an ontological character, as it   is not restricted to the position of women within a kinship system. It expands   to a condition of potential female impurity and danger. Contact with the   feminine elements and their ambiguous power involves presumed risks of   deconstruction of the person, although they represent the possibility of its   construction and persistence at the same time. The fact that this power is   attributed to women causes them to be subordinated to a male counter-power that   is made legitimate by the social spheres of the family and kinship, which makes   it possible to keep them pacified in order to produce the person and the social   matrix that has produced them. They are the object of actual violence for being   the perpetrators of a presumed violence in a system that is built around a permanent   and potential conflict, placing enemies very close to their victims.</p>     <p>The   consequences of this situation are reflected in the field of diseases, as   previously discussed. In this context, diseases have the potential to become   symptoms of contact with certain categories of persons marked by gender, or of   the voluntary actions of these persons. For this reason, diseases are   frequently taken for more than mere physiological events to be treated by   biomedicine - they constitute the category of "traditional disease". Therefore,   diseases provide concrete and critical experiences that make it possible to   articulate at the pragmatic level the ontological principles that operate in   the construction of the person and genders. </p>     <p>For instance,   in a scenario of HIV/AIDS epidemics with high rates of prevalence and death,   such as the case of Southern Mozambique, "traditional" experiences with   diseases ultimately define relations with its prevention and treatment (cf. Passador,   2009a). The association between Aids and <i>xivenze </i>that I found in some   speeches of subjects in my research is very illustrative. This is made possible   by conceptions of disease elaborated around cosmologic precepts and ontological   conflicts that define people, bodies, nature, gender, sexuality, and a whole   lot of pragmatic experiences based on them, which then redefines the experience   with the HIV/AIDS. </p>     <p>Hence, it is   possible to observe a constant elaboration of experiences with diseases in terms   which the notion of personhood and the gender relations are built,   pragmatically incorporated to the logic of a persistent and "traditional"   ontology. In this universe of "tradition", women are always rendered as problematic   and linked to pathologies in specific ways that corroborate to stigmatize them   as powerful "whores" and "evil" sorcerers, as attested by Jos&eacute;'s father.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="verdana" size="3"><b>References</b></font></p>     <p>Bagnol, Brigitte.   Gender, self, multiple identities, violence and magical interpretations in lobolo   practices in Southern Mozambique. Thesis for Ph.D. Degree in Social   Anthropology. Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cape Town, 2006.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>Butler, Judith. <i>Gender   trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity</i>. New York, London, Routledge, 1990.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Comaroff, John L.   &amp; Comaroff, Jean. On   personhood: an anthropological perspective from Africa. <i>Social Identities</i>,   7(2), 2001, pp.267-283.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Deleuze, Gilles   &amp; Guattari, F&eacute;lix. <i>Mille     plateaux: Capitalisme et schizophrenie</i>. Paris, Editions de Minuit, 1980.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Douglas, Mary.   Powers and dangers. In: <i>Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution     and taboo</i>. London, Routledge, 2002 [1966], pp.117-140.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Fausto, Carlos. <i>Inimigos   fi&eacute;is: hist&oacute;ria, guerra e xamanismo na Amaz&ocirc;nia</i>. S&atilde;o Paulo, EDUSP, 2001.    </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>Geffray, Christian. <i>La   cause des armes au Mozambique: anthropologie d'une guerre civile</i>. Paris/Nairobi,   Karthala/ CREDU, 1990.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Goodman, Nelson. <i>Ways   of worldmaking</i>. Indianapolis, Hackett, 1978.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Helgesson, Alf. The   Tswa response to christianity. Dissertation for Master Degree, Faculty of Arts,   University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 1971.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Honwana, Alcinda   Manuel. <i>Esp&iacute;ritos vivos, tradi&ccedil;&otilde;es modernas: Possess&atilde;o de esp&iacute;ritos e     reintegra&ccedil;&atilde;o social p&oacute;s-guerra no Sul de Mo&ccedil;ambique</i>. Maputo, Prom&eacute;dia,   2002.    </p>     <p>Jardim,   Marta.   De sogra para nora para sogra: Redes de com&eacute;rcio e de fam&iacute;lia em Mo&ccedil;ambique. <i>Cadernos Pagu</i> (29), N&uacute;cleo de Estudos de G&ecirc;nero - Pagu/Unicamp, 2007, pp.139-170.</p>     <!-- ref --><p>Junod, Henri A. <i>The   life of a south african tribe</i>. Vols. I and II. Montana, Kessinger   Publishing, 2003 [1926].    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Meneses, Maria   Paula. "Quando n&atilde;o h&aacute; problemas, estamos de boa sa&uacute;de, sem azar nem nada": para uma concep&ccedil;&atilde;o emancipat&oacute;ria da sa&uacute;de e das medicinas. In: Santos, Boaventura de Sousa &amp; Cruz e Silva, Teresa. <i>Mo&ccedil;ambique e a     reinven&ccedil;&atilde;o da emancipa&ccedil;&atilde;o social</i>. Maputo, Centro de Forma&ccedil;&atilde;o Jur&iacute;dica e   Judici&aacute;ria, 2004, pp.77-110.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>_________; Fumo, Joaquim; Mbilana, Guilherme &amp; Gomes,   Concei&ccedil;&atilde;o. As autoridades tradicionais no contexto do pluralismo jur&iacute;dico. In: Santos, Boaventura de Sousa &amp; Trindade, Jo&atilde;o Carlos. (eds.) <i>Conflito     e transforma&ccedil;&atilde;o social: Uma paisagem das justi&ccedil;as em Mo&ccedil;ambique, </i>1° Volume.   Porto, Edi&ccedil;&otilde;es Afrontamento, 2003, pp.341-425.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Passador, Luiz   Henrique. "Tradition", person, gender and STD/HIV/AIDS in Southern Mozambique. <i>Cadernos     de Sa&uacute;de P&uacute;blica</i>, 25(3), 2009a, pp.687-693.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>_________. "Eating alone" or when modernity feeds tradition:   Money and magic in Southern Mozambique. <i>VIBRANT</i>, 5(2), 2009b, pp.100-129 [<a href="http://www.vibrant.org.br" target="_blank">http://www.vibrant.org.br</a>].    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>_________. &amp; Thomaz, Omar Ribeiro. Ra&ccedil;a, sexualidade   e doen&ccedil;a em Mo&ccedil;ambique. <i>Revista Estudos Feministas</i>, 14(1), 2006,   pp.263-286.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Strathern, Marylin. <i>The   gender of the gift: problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia.</i> Berkeley, University of California, 1988.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Viveiros   de Castro,   Eduardo. <i>A inconst&acirc;ncia da alma selvagem - e outros ensaios de antropologia</i>.   S&atilde;o Paulo, Cossac &amp; Naify, 2002.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Webster, David J.   Agnation, alternative structures, and the individual in Chopi society.   Dissertation for Doctor Degree of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 1976.    </p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1">*</a> Text received for publication in September,   2009, and accepted in August, 2010. This text is the result of the research   developed for my doctoral studies (PPGAS-Unicamp) on "tradition" and the   universe of diseases in Southern Mozambique, with special focus on the local   experience with the HIV/AIDS epidemics. Fieldwork was conducted in the District   of Homo&iacute;ne, in the Province of Inhambane, between June 2007 and February 2008,   funded by CAPES through the Doctorate Intership Program Abroad. The research   was initially supervised by Dr. Omar Ribeiro Thomaz and then supervised by Dr.   Mariza Corr&ecirc;a (PPGAS-Unicamp), being co-supervised by Dr. Teresa Cruz e Silva   (CEA-UEM).    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br>   <a href="#_ftnref2" name="_ftn2" >**</a> Ph.D. in Social   Anthropology, PPGAS-Unicamp. <a href="mailto:lhpassador@gmail.com">lhpassador@gmail.com</a>    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref3" name="_ftn3">1</a>  All the   names of people that appear in the text are fictitious.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref4" name="_ftn4">2</a>  The expressions   "<i>curandeiro</i>" (fem. <i>curandeira</i>) and "<i>curandeirismo</i>" are   currently used in the Portuguese language by the inhabitants of Homo&iacute;ne to   refer respectively to traditional healers and traditional healing. The   expression for "<i>curandeiro</i>" in the local language (Citsua) is ‘<i>nyanga'</i>.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref5" name="_ftn5">3</a>  <i>Machamba</i> is the local expression used to refer to crops.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref6" name="_ftn6">4</a>  <i>Lobolo</i> is the name given to the traditional process of matrimonial alliance in Southern Mozambique (see Bagnol 2006 and Junod 1996). This expression is also currently used   to refer to the specific ceremony that celebrates the alliance. The <i>lobolo </i>is   traditionally acknowledged as marriage, although there are civil forms of   marriage defined by law.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref7" name="_ftn7">5</a>  Shortly   before that, Jos&eacute; had already had malaria, which may be supposed that he was   facing a relapse. A few months earlier, he had also had a respiratory disease for   which he was not able to inform the exact diagnosis. Its main symptom was   prolonged coughing.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref8" name="_ftn8">6</a>  <i>Tihlolo</i> is the divinatory process used by <i>curandeiros</i> to interpret the causes of   an evil deed. It is also known as <i>cuxa-cuxa</i>, expression created by the   Portuguese colonizers.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref9" name="_ftn9">7</a>  I use the   expressions "tradition" and "modernity" between quotation marks herein because   I refer to the emic uses of these categories made by the inhabitants of Homo&iacute;ne.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref10" name="_ftn10">8</a>  <i>Kutchinga </i>or <i>kutxinga</i> is the name given to the ritual for the purification of   people and goods associated with a recently deceased person when he/she was   alive. His/her goods may only be accessed after purification. Widows and widowers   must also be purified in order to have sexual intercourse with other partners.   Until they are purified, the deceased's relatives and widows must refrain from   having sexual intercourse and may not use the goods that belonged to the   deceased are completely purified. Traditionally, the <i>kutchinga </i>also   involves sexual intercourse of the widow with her brother-in-law. The basic   idea is that the semen "washes away" the woman's impurities. When her   brother-in-law refuses to do so, another member of the family is chosen or a   man out of the family group is hired to do it.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref11" name="_ftn11">9</a>  Refers to   women who have many sexual partners but is not necessarily a sex professional.    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br>   <a href="#_ftnref12" name="_ftn12">10</a> I use the   notions of performance and performativity to point out that identities and personhood   result from a pragmatic doing, taking the same theoretical perspective used by   Judith Butler (1990) to analyze genders.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref13" name="_ftn13">11</a> <i>Banca</i> is the term used to indicate small houses where small trade activities are   pursued. <i>Barraca</i> is the name of the covered huts observed in public   markets and streets.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref14" name="_ftn14">12</a> I use the   notion of construction of worlds refering to Nelson Goodman's (1978) notion of <i>worldmaking</i>.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref15" name="_ftn15">13</a> David   Webster (1976) drags our attention to the fluidity of these structures among   the Chopi, who inhabit an area adjacent to the one I studied.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref16" name="_ftn16">14</a> <i>Madoda</i> is the term used to refer to "great" men, usually elders, who are respected and   become a reference for communities and families.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref17" name="_ftn17">15</a> Regarding   the idea of <i>sograria,</i> also used among Hindu Indians in Southern   Mozambique, see Jardim (2007).    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref18" name="_ftn18">16</a> On the uses   of the term <i>xar&aacute;</i> (namesake) and the role of agnatic and matrilateral   relatives, neighbors, and formal friends, see Webster (1976). <i>Xar&aacute;s</i> are   individuals who share the same name. The exchange of names is a form of   alliance that establishes a <i>xar&aacute;</i> as a sort of one's relative. The same   is true for neighbors and formal friends.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref19" name="_ftn19">17</a> On the   notion of "great man", see Junod (2003 [1926]) and Webster (1976).    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref20" name="_ftn20">18</a> The   deposition of flowers is the last phase of the funeral process, carried out   eight days after burial.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref21" name="_ftn21">19</a> On July 18,   1987, the main village of Homo&iacute;ne staged the most significant massacre that   occurred during the civil war in Mozambique (1977-1992). On that occasion,   according to official statistics, 428 people were killed during the ten-hour   attack.    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br>   <a href="#_ftnref22" name="_ftn22">20</a> I use the   notion of rhizome as proposed by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari (Deleuze   &amp; Guattari 1980), understanding that it can explain how unstructured and   unpredictable the actions and processes attributed to sorcery are.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref23" name="_ftn23">21</a> Acronym of   the <i>Associa&ccedil;&atilde;o dos M&eacute;dicos Tradicionais de Mo&ccedil;ambique</i> (Association of the   Traditional Healers of Mozambique), entity acknowledged by the Mozambican S  tate. During my fieldwork I could observe the prevalence of its legal action   in the solution of cases of sorcery accusations, including some of them that   were sent to AMETRAMO by the very court of the District of Homo&iacute;ne. On the   history and action of AMETRAMO, see Meneses (2004), Meneses et alli (2003) and   Honwana (2002).    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref24" name="_ftn24">22</a> Expression   used to refer to soldiers of RENAMO (Mozambique National Resistance), which   opposed the government of FRELIMO (Mozambique Liberty Front) during the civil   war. The etymological root of the word <i>matsanga</i> is the name of the first   leader of RENAMO, Andr&eacute; Matsanga&iacute;ssa. People also usually referred to RENAMO soldiers   as <i>bandidos armados</i> (armed bandits) to qualify them as criminals.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref25" name="_ftn25">23</a> According to   Douglas (2002), the notions of danger and power are associated with   interstitial, undetermined, and non-structured spaces.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref26" name="_ftn26">24</a> On the uses   of sorcery, traditional healing, and religion during the civil war, see Geffray   (1990) and Honwana (2002).    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref27" name="_ftn27">25</a> On relationships   between sorcery, <i>curandeirismo</i>, and market, see Passador (2009b).    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref28" name="_ftn28">26</a> Especially   the works of Viveiros de Castro (2002) and Fausto (2001).    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref29" name="_ftn29">27</a> The etymological   root of the word <i>viente</i> is the Portuguese verb <i>vir </i>(to come) and   refers to people who come from somewhere else. It operates as a marker of   alterity regarding the original location and/or residence of a person.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref30" name="_ftn30">28</a> <i>Nyamussoro </i>(pl. <i>vanyamussoro</i>), according to Honwana (2002),   is the most powerful category of practitioner in the traditional healing system   of Southern Mozambique. A <i>nyamussoro</i> operates Tsonga lineage spirits (<i>tinguluve</i>,   sing. <i>nguluve</i>) together with Nguni (pl. <i>vanguni</i>) and Ndau (pl. <i>vandau</i>)   spirits, respectively from the Zulu and from Central Mozambique areas. According   to the author, this category emerged in Southern region as a result of the   invasion of the Vanguni, who subordinated the Tsonga and the Vandau and   produced matrimonial, spiritual, and hierarchical alliances between these three   groups.</p> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bagnol]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Brigitte]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gender, Self, Multiple Identities, Violence and Magical Interpretations in Lovolo Practices in Southern Mozambique]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Butler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Judith]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New YorkLondon ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Comaroff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Comaroff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jean]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[On Personhood: an Anthropological Perspective from Africa]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Social Identities]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>267-283</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Deleuze]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gilles]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guattari]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Félix]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mille Plateaux: Capitalisme et Schizophrenie]]></source>
<year></year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editions de Minuit]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Douglas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mary]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Powers and Dangers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Purity and Danger: An analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<page-range>117-140</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fausto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carlos]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Inimigos fiéis: história, guerra e xamanismo na Amazônia]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[EDUSP]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geffray]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Christian]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La cause des armes au Mozambique: anthropologie d'une guerre civile]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[ParisNairobi ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[KarthalaCREDU]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goodman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nelson]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ways of Worldmaking]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Indianapolis ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hackett]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Helgesson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alf]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Tswa Response to Christianity]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Honwana]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alcinda Manuel]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Espíritos vivos, tradições modernas: Possessão de espíritos e reintegração social pós-guerra no Sul de Moçambique]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Maputo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Promédia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jardim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marta]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[De sogra para nora para sogra: Redes de comércio e de família em Moçambique]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cadernos Pagu]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<page-range>139-170</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Unicamp]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Junod]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Henri A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Life of a South African Tribe]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>I</volume><volume>II</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Montana ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Kessinger Publishing]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meneses]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maria Paula]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA["Quando não há problemas, estamos de boa saúde, sem azar nem nada": para uma concepção emancipatória da saúde e das medicinas]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Boaventura de Sousa]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cruz e Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Teresa]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Moçambique e a reinvenção da emancipação social]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<page-range>77-110</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Maputo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro de Formação Jurídica e Judiciária]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meneses]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maria Paula]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fumo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joaquim]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mbilana]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Guilherme]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gomes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Conceição]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[As autoridades tradicionais no contexto do pluralismo jurídico]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Boaventura de Sousa]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Trindade]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[João Carlos]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Conflito e transformação social: Uma paisagem das justiças em Moçambique]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>341-425</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Porto ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Edições Afrontamento]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Passador]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luiz Henrique]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA["Tradition", Person, Gender and STD/HIV/AIDS in Southern Mozambique]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cadernos de Saúde Pública]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>687-693</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Passador]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luiz Henrique]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA["Eating Alone" or When Modernity Feeds Tradition: Money and Magic in Southern Mozambique]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[VIBRANT]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>100-129</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Passador]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luiz Henrique]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thomaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Omar Ribeiro]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Raça, sexualidade e doença em Moçambique]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Estudos Feministas]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>263-286</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Strathern]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marylin]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berkeley ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of California]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Viveiros de Castro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eduardo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A inconstância da alma selvagem - e outros ensaios de antropologia]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cossac & Naify]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Webster]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[David J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Agnation, Alternative Structures, and the Individual in Chopi Society]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
