<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1413-0580</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Estud.soc.agric.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1413-0580</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1413-05802008000100007</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Brazilian agribusiness's insertion in global markets]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paula]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nilson de]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bastos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lívia Tiemi]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reinhardt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bruno Mafra Ney]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Federal University of Paraná Economics Department ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Federal University of Paraná  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>se</numero>
<fpage>0</fpage>
<lpage>0</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1413-05802008000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1413-05802008000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1413-05802008000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[This paper analyzes the insertion of Brazilian agribusiness in the world market, with a focus on food products, given the prevailing conditions of international competition. Although some activities reveal a more salient trend toward higher levels of added value and product differentiation, the exports of unprocessed or bulk commodities have become more important. Empirical evidence reveals a discrepancy between the Brazilian food business's pattern in international trade relations and internationally prevailing trends. As a result, the fact that Brazilian agribusiness has become highly complex and that some activities have evolved towards sophistication and product differentiation, especially in recent years, has not resulted in competitive advantages other than those stemming from natural resources and agricultural innovations.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Este trabalho procura analisar a inserção do agronegócio brasileiro nos mercados mundiais, com ênfase nos produtos alimentares, tendo em vista as condições de concorrência predominantes. Embora alguns segmentos do agronegócio venham revelando uma tendência mais acentuada de agregação de valor e diferenciação de produtos, observa-se uma maior capacidade de inserção nos mercados mundiais naquelas atividades produtoras de commodities, com grau inferior de processamento. As evidências empíricas analisadas neste artigo revelam uma discrepância entre o padrão de inserção do agronegócio brasileiro nos mercados mundiais e as tendências predominantes internacionalmente. O fato de o agronegócio alimentar brasileiro ter se tornado altamente complexo e diferenciado não se projetou, em especial nos últimos anos, nas relações de comércio exterior, através de vantagens competitivas não lastreadas apenas em recursos naturais e inovações agropecuárias.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Agribusiness]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[food production]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[agriculture]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[international trade]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[agronegócio]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[produção agroalimentar]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[agricultura]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[mercados mundiais]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p><font face="Verdana" size="4"><b>Brazilian agribusiness's insertion in global    markets</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Nilson de Paula<a href="#nta1">*</a><a name="a1"></a>;    Lívia Tiemi Bastos<a href="#nta2">**</a><a name="a2"></a></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Translated by Bruno Mafra Ney Reinhardt    <br>   Translation from <b>Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura</b>, Rio de Janeiro, vol.    17 no. 2, p. 304-331, Novembro 2009.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>ABSTRACT</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">This paper analyzes the insertion of Brazilian    agribusiness in the world market, with a focus on food products, given the prevailing    conditions of international competition. Although some activities reveal a more    salient trend toward higher levels of added value and product differentiation,    the exports of unprocessed or bulk commodities have become more important. Empirical    evidence reveals a discrepancy between the Brazilian food business's pattern    in international trade relations and internationally prevailing trends. As a    result, the fact that Brazilian agribusiness has become highly complex and that    some activities have evolved towards sophistication and product differentiation,    especially in recent years, has not resulted in competitive advantages other    than those stemming from natural resources and agricultural innovations.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Key words: </b> Agribusiness, food production,    agriculture, international trade.</font></p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>RESUMO</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Este trabalho procura analisar a inserção do    agronegócio brasileiro nos mercados mundiais, com ênfase nos produtos alimentares,    tendo em vista as condições de concorrência predominantes. Embora alguns segmentos    do agronegócio venham revelando uma tendência mais acentuada de agregação de    valor e diferenciação de produtos, observa-se uma maior capacidade de inserção    nos mercados mundiais naquelas atividades produtoras de <i>commodities</i>,    com grau inferior de processamento. As evidências empíricas analisadas neste    artigo revelam uma discrepância entre o padrão de inserção do agronegócio brasileiro    nos mercados mundiais e as tendências predominantes internacionalmente. O fato    de o agronegócio alimentar brasileiro ter se tornado altamente complexo e diferenciado    não se projetou, em especial nos últimos anos, nas relações de comércio exterior,    através de vantagens competitivas não lastreadas apenas em recursos naturais    e inovações agropecuárias.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Palavras-chave</b>: agronegócio, produção    agroalimentar, agricultura, mercados mundiais.</font></p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="3"><b>Introduction</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Recent developments in the international food    market have been marked by multiple tendencies in its different realms of activity.    This has been particularly evident from the perspective of technological innovations    related to the rural and industrial processing spheres. Although the global    commodities market is still relevant, transactions involving processed products    have progressively gained momentum, while prompting relationships typical of    intra-industrial commerce. One could affirm that the global agribusiness market    reflects structural characteristics of each country's productive chains, and    particularly the tone set by technology innovation processes taking place in    each sector of the productive stage. Hence, in face of the growing influence    of manufactured products vis-à-vis commodities, more attention should be paid    to the competitive power of the industrial share of food supply, in terms of    the nature of processes of product differentiation and technical innovation.    The greater the importance of commodities in the exports agenda (and, consequently,    in the agribusiness competitiveness), the more germane become classical determinants    of comparative advantages derived from factor productivity and endowment.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The starting point of this analysis is agribusiness's    significant weight in the Brazilian economy; it generates around one third of    the GNP and almost 40% of jobs and total exports. Even though it participates    in global markets as a modern competitive set of activities, Brazilian agribusiness    should not be seen as a homogeneous aggregate responding to a single economic    and technological dynamics. In these terms, the competitive power of agribusiness,    taken as a whole, derives from technological transformations in the rural sphere    during the last 40 years which have built upon favorable natural conditions.    The transformative waves that succeeded this period increasingly led this set    of activities toward an industrial logic in which large processing companies    have played a leading role. However, this phenomenon has not been dynamic enough    to approximate Brazilian agribusiness to the global tendencies of our times:    more complex agro-alimentary exports and the greater added value of processed    products.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">This article is structured in three sections.    Firstly, it discusses dominant trends in global trade, in which processed products    have become increasingly relevant. Secondly, it presents an analytical framework    focused on the relationship between technological innovation and international    commerce. After pointing out the main global trends and their determinant factors,    we will discuss the insertion of Brazilian agribusiness in the global markets    and its new competitive challenges. Finally, we will lay out some of this analysis's    conclusions.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="3"><b>Patterns in the international food market</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Agribusiness' pattern of international trade    has shown an increasing weight of processed products, thus displacing its determinants    progressively away from their rural basis and towards the industrial sector.    Gaining market share internationally comes to depend heavily, first, on the    capacity to break new ground in technological innovation (product differentiation),    and second, on the degree of articulation among different industrial sectors    in face of the globalization of consumption patterns. Consequently, not only    has the competitiveness of the agro-industrial systems shifted from their rural    roots towards the industrial sector, but also international trade has become    emphatically intra-industrial.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Predictions made by Ray Goldberg regarding income    breakdown from global agribusiness indicate that agriculture and stockbreeding    production will reduce its participation from 32% in 1950 to 10% in 2028, while    the processing and distribution industry will increase its share from 50% to    81% during the same period (VALOR ECONÔMICO, 2006: B11). This estimate confirms    the pattern evolution of international agribusiness trade, characterized during    the last decades by a growth of processed products more robust than that of    homogenous agricultural products. Between 1981 and 2000, the former increased    in value by an annual rate of 6%, compared to the latter's 3.3% rate (FAO, 2005).    In the same vein, Henderson <i>et al</i>. (1998) identified more expressive    growth of processed products than commodities<a href="#_ftn3" name="_ftnref3" title=""><sup>1</sup></a>    in the international arena, thus indicating the emergence of an intra-industrial    trend in the foods market. These data allow us to conclude that formulations    based on the endowment factors paradigm, defined by the model H-O-S and typically    used to explain the commodities market, are unable to account for the current    trends in the agribusiness market as a whole.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Moreover, while the progressive "decommoditization"    of food trade has been much more evident in developed countries<a href="#_ftn4" name="_ftnref4" title=""><sup>2</sup></a> and their similar industrial    structures, less developed countries still remain attached to the dominance    of commodities in their exports. Even though this tendency has not been fully    globalized yet, being restricted so far to developed and recently industrialized    countries (TRAILL, 1996), the global consumption of homogenous products or those    with a low degree of processing has progressively decreased. The interpretation    of this trend must be based not only in consumer behavior, preferences, life    styles and income level, but also on variables pertaining to production such    as technological innovation, formation and internationalization of productive    chains, and so forth. "The task of moving food from farm to table has become    more complex, involving diverse local, national, and global agents and networks."    (REGMI and GEHLHAR, 2005: 5).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Although consumption of processed products in    developed economies still accounts for the greatest share of the global food    market,<a href="#_ftn5" name="_ftnref5" title=""><sup>3</sup></a> an important shift has    generated demand for more sophisticated products, generally attached to services    and conveniences. This trend has also been present in developing countries,    especially due to general increases in income which have spurred an evident    growth in the fast-food and semi-prepared meals market. Despite differences    between national patterns of food consumption, the share of higher-value products    has reached almost 80% of the global agribusiness market.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The different market strategies adopted by companies    remain greatly relevant (particularly the EMNs), as they have a formative impact    on demand. But also the projection of productive chains beyond national boundaries    has been of critical importance, as it overcomes international technology and    market disparities. In other words, the more concentrated the market structure    becomes, the more intense is the standardization of the patterns of production    and consumption of food products. "Since the 1970s, corporate concentration    has also accelerated in the downstream sectors of the agro-food system, especially    as a result of a string of major takeovers, mergers and leveraged buy-outs.    As a result, much of the international trade in food and agricultural products    now lies in the hands of a small number of very large multinational corporations"    (WARD and ALMAS, 1997: 614).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">In this context, the dominance of large agribusiness    companies operates firstly by means of a shift towards the productive basis    of commodities, thus installing new productive capacity in production and processing    regions. Secondly, demand for industrial processing in importing countries has    led these companies to explore consumption markets through direct investment    (IDE), particularly where demand tends to match that of developed countries.    The easy transfer and adaptation of technology in the processing sphere allows    companies to increase sales by means of IDE strategies, considering the mobility    of capital and technology available in the markets. That is how companies investing    abroad strategically adjust their processing and packing activities to the preferences    of local consumers and demands by retail agents. The IDE initiatives represent,    therefore, the best alternative to explore markets from within, substituting    exports particularly in countries whose consumption market are large enough    to absorb branch units of the foods industry's major investors (REGMI <i>et    al.</i>, 2005).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The closer relation between industrial processing    and local markets renders evident the complementarity between international    trade of industrialized products and IDE, grounded on the companies' global    strategies and the gradual convergence of national consumption patterns. However,    considering the negative effect of high income concentration in the population    targeted by the food industry, the disparity between less developed and industrialized    countries in terms of their consumption market tends to be considerable. The    more concentrated the income, the more limited is the demand for diversified    products and, therefore, fewer the initiatives for products differentiation    by the food industry. In other words, once consumption gets closer to the internationally    dominant patterns, the appeal of transferring productive and distributive networks    to the local market becomes more compelling and, as a result, competition with    local companies is intensified (PAULA, 2001). In sum, the limits to the standardization    of consumption posed by the distance between local market and global pattern    delay innovation and restrict the competitive environment to the national food    industry. The local conditions of consumption may then diverge from global tendencies    and inhibit the dynamism of agro-food companies.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Consequently, the chief challenges to the processing    (especially food) industry are in the need to combine gains of scale with product    differentiation in order to accumulate value and reach the most segmented markets.    These challenges increase with the domestic markets' level of openness to imports    and foreign capital (PAULA, 2000).</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="3"><b>Technological innovation in agribusiness and    the international market</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The coordination between agribusiness and industrial    and commercial activities has been a leading concern of economic analyses of    the rural milieu. Based on this assumption, various concepts have overcome a    compartmentalized vision of the economy according to which its distinct components    are aggregated by a single dynamics. Despite the differences between the pioneer    formulations about agribusiness proposed by Davis and Goldberg (1957) and the    subsequent concepts of agro-industrial complex and agro-industrial system, which    derive from distinct theoretical frameworks, economic analysis has shared a    keen awareness about the loss of importance of agriculture that accompanies    the dominance of industrial and commercial activities (GRAZIANO DA SILVA, 1996).    Hence, the most relevant aspect for the purposes of this analysis is the perception    that agriculture and stockbreeding activities articulate in an aggregate whose    links to the industry are increasingly important. Keeping that in mind, and    acknowledging some of its limitations, we will deploy here the concept of agribusiness    in order to identify a regional aggregate while simultaneously stressing its    structural (particularly technological) transformations.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The structural complexity of agribusiness implies    that its relations to markets are determined by distinct productive dynamics,    which vary according to the product and productive chains, economic agents,    and especially technological innovation. The performance of agribusiness in    the international arena is associated firstly to the logics of comparative advantages    in terms of factors endowment, which explains exports of agricultural commodities.    Nonetheless, attention must be also paid to the greater weight biotechnological    innovations are assuming in rural areas. Even though natural conditions remain    an essential factor, farming and stockbreeding activities have been increasingly    characterized as deeply technological and knowledge-based. On the other hand,    agribusiness' industrial segments are involved in a trade pattern in which internal    and external economies, technology and product differentiation become crucial    factors accounting for trends in exports. In sum, the innovation process is    fundamentally different in each case, defining obstacles to exports according    to the weight of each determinant.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">To a great extent, agribusiness' competitiveness    is conditioned by mechanisms of technology generation and transfer, varying    according to the degree of convergence between the productive structures of    each activity and global trends. Consequently, each country's insertion in the    global market is directly affected by their level of local technological development,    in which the management structure, the institutional infrastructure of technology    innovation and diffusion, and the level of internationalization of productive    chains play a leading role (HUMPHREY; SCHMITZ, 2000).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Chemical, physical and biological innovations,    synthesized during the so-called process of industrialization of agriculture    which increased its efficiency in a global scale during the twentieth century,<a href="#_ftn6" name="_ftnref6" title=""><sup>4</sup></a> have leveraged the capacity    of the pioneering countries in terms of the development and adoption of high    production technologies. From the mid-60's, the dissemination of a technological    paradigm marked by high-yield intermediate goods to developing countries has    internationalized the agro-food system and created new competitors in the global    markets. As a consequence, the projection of new agricultural-export economies    into the global market has been based on particular commodities, the ingredients    of an international model of production and consumption that has orbited around    the United States.<a href="#_ftn7" name="_ftnref7" title=""><sup>5</sup></a></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Technological innovations in agro-industrial    activities reflect existing material and commercial differences and, therefore,    requirements for competitiveness. In rural areas, the innovation process is    constrained by the dependent character of this productive activity vis-à-vis    advances in the industrial sector, and by rural producers' capacity to explore    efficiently abundant natural resources. Following Pavitts' (1984) axioms, agriculture    and stockbreeding activities are dependent on providers of external innovation,    whose products are appropriated by the acquisition of intermediate goods inputs    and equipments, and according to price and cost levels. The industrial food    processing sector, on its turn, shows a hybrid dynamics of technological change.    Large companies at the forefront of oligopolistic competition enjoy greater    autonomy when it comes to developing new products and processes. In parallel,    a large number of companies behave according to a logic similar to that of agriculture,    that is, as receivers and users of innovation, thus contributing only marginally    to eventual innovative changes. Possas <i>et al.</i> (1994) stress that the    particular conditions of agriculture and other fragile activities end up limiting    innovation and, to some extent, reducing gains related to the scale and diversification    of activities.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The relationship between innovation and international    trade in agribusiness is crossed by two main trends. On the one hand, there    is the intensification of already existing competitive advantages, through increases    in productivity and more intensive exploitation of abundant natural resources.    Although diversified products may emerge from the biotechnological paradigm,    innovations incorporated to commodity production tend to be standardized, with    a direct impact on the level of production and productivity in the field. In    this case, innovation is promoted by companies that provide intermediate goods    and equipments, planning and technical assistance, and government institutions    working on the generation, adaptation and diffusion of technologies (POSSAS    <i>et al.</i>, 1994). One may conclude that even though agriculture and stockbreeding    activities may become technology and knowledge-intensive, their effects tend    to reinforce a pattern of competitiveness with low potential for multiplication    due to the rural nature of these productive activities.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">On the other hand, the industrial sector of agribusiness,    which processes agriculture and stockbreeding products, introduces variables    exploring market opportunities related to new processes and products that extrapolate    the mere leveraging of comparative advantages. From this perspective, the relationship    between the innovative process in agribusiness and international trade becomes    more dynamic and subject to challenges related to the global agro-food system    and to an increasingly internationalized consumption pattern. As a result, strategies    for value accumulation and product differentiation gain more relevance, as they    rely more heavily on the industrial processing structure and, as an extension,    on the productive rural basis and providers of intermediate goods for agriculture    and stockbreeding.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Consequently, one is led to assume that the projection    of agribusiness onto the international market by means of value-adding strategies    presupposes an industrial sector able to implement innovation processes, particularly    those related to product differentiation. These data support Archibugi and Mitchie's    (1998) interpretation, which argues that a better performance in the international    market is determined by technological competencies related to cost reduction    and product quality, resulting in greater appeal to local and foreign consumers    and the formation of temporary monopolies engaged in the creation of new products.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">But as established by evolutionary authors (FURTADO,    2006), the competitiveness of exports is dependent on the inter-relations between    producers and users of technology. It thus varies according to the degree of    sophistication of products and the complexity of the productive structure. A    direct relationship is therefore established between the performance of exports    and technological advancement, or between the domestic market of means and techniques    of production and the level of competitiveness in the international arena, positively    influenced by the approximation between users and producers of technology. These    interrelationships, which are formed within domestic markets, derive to a large    extent from global strategies by multinational companies interested in seizing    local opportunities, either by means of IDE or by shaping internationalized    productive chains which empower local competencies.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The growing importance of processed foods in    global markets indicates the emergence of a competitive environment for agribusiness,    where an industrial logic of product differentiation becomes dominant. Conversely,    the greater the importance of commodities or little processed products to a    country's agro-industrial exports, the less dynamic is agribusiness, and the    more relevant are innovations centered on agriculture and stockbreeding production.    Based on this evaluation, we now turn to an analysis of the performance of Brazilian    food agribusiness' chief activities in the international market.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="3"><b>Food agribusiness and recent trends in the    global market</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The insertion of Brazilian agribusiness<a href="#_ftn8" name="_ftnref8" title=""><sup>6</sup></a> in global markets began    to intensify in the early 1970's, when the United States lost relative space    in the main import markets of Europe, Soviet Union and Asia, particularly Japan.<a href="#_ftn9" name="_ftnref9" title=""><sup>7</sup></a>    This shift in supply has been enabled by the very reproduction of the American    production model, by means of the internationalization of technologies involved    in the transformative wave of the Green Revolution. In Friedmann's (1993) terms,    there was a replication of the American agro-food productive model, not only    within agricultural, but also when building up the agro-industrial processing    structure. Brazilian agribusiness has projected itself internationally as supplier    of chief commodities in the world agro-food system centered on the consumption    of animal protein.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">This trend, made possible by a dense innovative    process and an aggressive stimulus policy, enabled a meaningful increase in    productivity and the construction of a robust agro-industrial park. The formation    of Brazilian agribusiness unfolds in tune with the evolution of global markets,    not only because it engages in the trade of modern commodities in lieu of traditional    crops, but also because it builds an articulated network between agriculture    and stockbreeding and the means of production and processing industries. This    dynamics promoted a new configuration of the Brazilian agribusiness both in    terms of its spatial dimensions and the composition of its activities. Soybean    has come to the fore as an ingredient for a dynamic agriculture based on larger    properties, and where technological transformation has found greater resonance.    From this perspective, the actual rural basis of Brazilian agribusiness emerges    as already modern and highly integrated to global markets, especially due to    historical advantages and technological advances in the fields and in the processing    industry (FERRAZ; KUPFER e HAGUENAUER, 1997). This has had a determinant weight    on the country's balance of trade.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The aforementioned quick achievement of a competitive    position in the global market entailed the formation of a complex food processing    industry, which goes beyond the typically small companies historically connected    to local markets. At a steady pace, and as part of a context of persistent capital    concentration, large national companies have emerged, and multinational corporations    were attracted. Hence, the food industry's increasing complexity coupled with    a dynamic and competitive rural basis, thus strengthening the industrial elements    of Brazilian agribusiness, characterized by a significant presence of the globalized    agro-food industry (MARTINELLI, 1999).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">But has this dynamism been able to go beyond    increases in productivity and scale, and evolve toward a higher differentiation    of industrial products and added value? How could business initiatives related    to the sophistication of products alter the profile of Brazilian agribusiness'    exports? Or, to which extent has the industrial segment of agribusiness evolved    internationally, if considered from the point of view of a commercial pattern    that encompasses processing?</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">One of the main qualities of Brazilian agribusiness    is its high export performance, made evident by an expressive growth in external    sales in recent years, which reached 40% of total exports between 2000 and 2006.    During this period, this performance generated a 140% export growth, against    59% of the 1990 to 2000 period (MAPA, 2008). Besides favorable conditions in    currency, this trend has been pushed by the evolution of international prices    and, fundamentally, by an increase in productivity along different stages of    agro-industrial production. Regarding its composition, the agribusiness performance    in global markets has been influenced by the lively dynamism of some activities,    particularly soybeans, meat and the sugarcane-biofuels complex,<a href="#_ftn10" name="_ftnref10" title=""><sup>8</sup></a> whose accumulated evolution    during the period from 2000 to 2006 was, respectively, 122%, 341% and 530%.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Nonetheless, this spectacular evolution hides    distinct trends if we take value adding into account; in this respect, Brazilian    agribusiness exports seem to depart from international tendencies. Whereas the    weight of processed agricultural products in exports reduced from 47% in 1990-1991    to 40% in 2001-2002, that of imports increased from 29% to 32% (VALOR ECONÔMICO,    2004: A14). Generally, the participation of agricultural products in global    exports rates has decreased faster than in Brazil. Whereas in the triennium    1979/81 these products represented 44% of Brazilian and 12% of global exports,    in 2002 these numbers decreased to 28% e 7%, respectively. These data might    indicate that Brazilian agribusiness has been able to affirm itself in the global    market through products of declining value. Additionally, even agriculture and    stockbreeding-related commodities can be seen as progressively more technology    intensive, even though they are still conditioned by comparative advantages    linked to natural factors. Differently, industrial processing retains an innovative    dynamics in terms of both products and processes, and is able to accumulate    value and generate competitive advantages according to the industry's profile    and its capacity to explore new markets.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Keeping this particular segmentation of agribusiness    in mind, its insertion in the global market will be heretofore analyzed in variance    to the level of product transformation, which will be used as a proxy to capture    the technological dynamism underlying the whole process. We will presume then,    that processed products contain more added value, therefore being considered    as more sophisticated from an industrial point of view. In other words, the    more developed the agribusiness industrial sector, the greater the weight of    innovations stemming from the industry's competitive strategies. Conversely,    the more determinant the rural segment, the greater the relevance of those sectors    from which agriculture extracts its competitive advantages. Based on the TradeCan    database, elaborated by Cepal/World Bank, it was possible to classify food exports    into three different segments, according to the level of added value, namely,    commodities (unprocessed), processed 1 (products with lower degree of processing)    and processed 2 (products with higher degree of processing).<a href="#_ftn11" name="_ftnref11" title=""><sup>9</sup></a> This typology allows    us to discern three ways of accessing markets and their respective patterns    of competitiveness, assuming that the degree of product transformation and value    adding would be coeval with the existing innovative dynamism. In this sense,    unprocessed commodities are embedded in technological trajectories specific    to agriculture which are widely disseminated in terms of natural comparative    advantages. Exports with a low degree of processing, on their turn, are determined    by economies of low scale and insufficient product and process innovation, instances    that receive merely superficial contributions from the participant companies.    Finally, the route followed by industrialized products toward global markets    is determined by an industrial structure able to differentiate products and    add value, thus achieving a higher degree of autonomy because of their more    aggressive competitive strategies, especially when it comes to new products.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Brazilian agro-food exports have shown a high    degree of diversification regarding the products and their industries. Taking    as baseline the framework we have adopted so far, processed food products (processed    2) had, during the long period between 1985 and 2004, a major participation    in the value of food agribusiness exports.<a href="#_ftn12" name="_ftnref12" title=""><sup>10</sup></a>    However, the behavior of exporting sectors must be also seen from the context    of international trends. In order to do that, we will use the level of specialization    as a gauge to capture the articulation between the profile of Brazilian exports    and those of the rest of the world, thus applying it to the three main productive    segments of Brazil's food agribusiness.</font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <img src="/img/revistas/s_esaa/v4nse/a07img01.gif" align="absmiddle">     <b>–</b> Ratio between the marketshare of Brazilian exports <b><i>i </i></b>and    the participation of Brazil's overall food exports in total global imports</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Even though this set of activities has recently    shown a high level of competitiveness, this trend has unfolded more emphatically    with regards to commodities and low-processing products, in accordance with    their participation in the global market. Moreover, the degree of specialization    indicates that, from the perspective of the weight food agribusiness exports    have in total exports, low added-value products have figured prominently. This    tendency has been particularly evident after 1995, when the Brazilian economy    started its programs of macroeconomic stabilization (<a href="#g1">Graph 1</a>).    It should be noted that, after a decade of decline, the market share of commodities    regained breath, while that of processed foods started sloping down. This revealed    a propensity to specialization in products of low or zero processing, whose    participation evolves positively vis-à-vis the totality of alimentary products.    This tendency was reinforced during the period between 1998 and 2004, when a    strong currency devaluation pumped exports of homogenous products, reversing    their previous positions. Conversely, whereas the food agribusiness as a whole    regained the competitiveness of the 1980's, gains generated by higher-value    products have decreased.</font></p>     <p><a name="g1"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/s_esaa/v4nse/a07g1.gif"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">This measure allows us to relate the insertion    of each of the three productive trends with the performance of the food agribusiness.    Values over 1 indicate that a particular segment has gained preeminence on the    totality of the food agro-industry, thus presenting a growth in its market-share    that is larger than total activities. On the one hand, Brazilian food agribusiness    presents a strong specialization in homogenous products, identified by the rise    of both commodities and other products with low degree of processing. On the    other hand, industrialized products (processed 2), although showing a light    increase until 1999, maintained a level of specialization lower than 1 during    the entire period, with significant loss in subsequent years. This means that,    whereas global markets have evolved towards more sophisticated products (as    previously indicated), the competitiveness of Brazilian agribusiness stabilized    on a divergent path from the year 2000 on.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">In addition to the tendency observed in the period    taken as a whole, macro-economic factors such as tax and currency policies,    and the behavior of the imports market have had great influence on the performance    of agribusiness' exports. Domestically, a key event has been the Kandir Law,    enacted in 1996, which makes agricultural exports tax-free. By the same token,    the currency devaluation in 1999 has had a direct impact on the exports of homogenous    products, whose capacity to react to price fluctuations has increased. One should    add to that list the strategy of importing countries, such as China, to prioritize    the acquisition of unprocessed raw materials, as well as the increase in the    international commodities price since 2000.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Despite the specificity of each productive segment    in terms of the plurality of agents they involve and their price-formation mechanism    (pricing), the insertion of Brazilian agribusiness in global markets is ultimately    determined by typically homogenous products. In this sense, according to the    abovementioned tendencies, the degree of innovation invested in product differentiation    (processed 2) has not been enough to contribute to the rise of competitiveness    standards up to the level of the industrialized food products segment, which    has grown robust internationally. In other words, the industrial dynamism of    the Brazilian food agribusiness did not translate into a quality shift in the    country's commercial relationships with the rest of the world, to the extent    that the complexity of the Brazilian food industry has not been able to expand    internationally and has remained restricted to its domestic market.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">These trends in the Brazilian food agribusiness    become even more evident if contrasted with those found internationally among    other great exporters of food products. As shown in <a href="/img/revistas/s_esaa/v4nse/a07g2.gif">Graph    2</a>, in recent years countries presented distinct export trajectories. It    is revealing that most Brazilian exports reach the lower levels of the chart    as products become more sophisticated. A reverse tendency is found in the other    countries analyzed, namely Australia, United States and France, whose processed    food exports have grown more vigorously than those of other countries and other    product trends. The case of Argentina should also be mentioned since, similarly    to Brazil, it has had an outstanding performance when it comes to homogenous    products, including commodities and little-processed products.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The importance of products with a higher degree    of processing is directly linked to the development stage of the food industry    and, consequently, to the country's competitiveness. In this sense, the performance    of the agri-food industry relies not only on strategies proposed by the companies    but also on industrial and technological development policies that attempt to    take advantage of export opportunities, strengthening the productive chains    and keeping quality control systems attuned to the signs emitted by major consuming    markets.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The evolution presented in <a href="/img/revistas/s_esaa/v4nse/a07g2.gif">Graph    2</a> can be also observed in terms of the degree of specialization. In order    to do that, and aiming at a comparison, we will consider only the cases of Argentina    and Australia, both emerging countries with economic structures similar to Brazil's    (<a href="/img/revistas/s_esaa/v4nse/a07g3.gif">Graph 3</a>). Nonetheless, the    establishment of the food agribusiness in these countries reveals very distinctive    tendencies and export patterns. Firstly, presenting greater evolution, Argentina    is characterized by a vigorous performance in products of low or zero processing    and a weak performance in industrialized food exports. Moreover, even though    the powerful push on commodities between 1994 and 2002 placed its economy in    a situation very akin to Brazil's, Argentina's competitiveness is still higher    in terms of products with some level of processing (processed 1). Conversely,    Australia is characterized by an extremely diverse tendency, not only because    of its expressive evolution in the market­ share of processed foods, but also    because of its high degree of specialization within this segment of products.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">In fact, the tendencies presented here are not    only the outcome of each country's competitive conditions in each of the segments    approached, but also the consequence of strategies adopted in response to the    different markets in which agribusiness has been established. The performance    of agro-food exports in the case of Brazil and Argentina reveals their capacity    of providing timely responses to attractive market conditions, enabling opportunities    in areas in which their comparative advantages had already been established.    Moreover, commercial strategies have progressively turned their attention to    the commodities market, whose prices have been highly profitable in recent years.    Conversely, the case of Australia is typical of strategies centered on the construction    of competitive advantages resulting from technological and agro-industrial development,    whose impact on exports occurs mostly among industrialized products.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="3"><b>Final considerations</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">This article looked at the evolution of Brazilian    agribusiness in light of processes of technological innovation and the ruling    tendencies in international trade. To this end, this set of activities was grouped    in three segments according to the level of processing, tracing the innovative    dynamics as it operates in specific markets. The nature of innovation embedded    in the food agribusiness shows distinct technological trajectories, in terms    of each productive segment, their resources structure and their degree of autonomy    in generating new products and processes.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Current tendencies affecting the global food    market have shown the strong dominance of processed products as compared to    commodities. This indicates, therefore, that the determinants of competitiveness    tend to be situated much more in the industrial sphere than in the agricultural    basis. An empirical analysis led us to conclude that the evolution of Brazilian    agribusiness has proceeded, to a certain extent, in dissonance with global tendencies.    Clearly, even under relatively unfavorable currency conditions, Brazilian exports    have shown a considerable level of specialization in products with null or low    level of industrial processing. This suggests the great significance of innovative    processes related to the rural basis, if compared to those related to industrial    processing.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Conversely, the food industry, while embracing    some product differentiation, remains strongly attached to the domestic market,    both in national and local terms. To a certain degree, this condition acts as    a strong determinant of the processing industry's growth towards a higher product    diversification and sophistication. The possibility that this industry will    respond positively to the problem of adding value to exports depends, to some    extent, on the characteristics of the local market, whose consumption patterns    may differ from those of developed economies. To which extent this lack of coordination    between the profile of domestic demand and that of international markets influences    the trade pattern is a topic that remains to be explored. Finally, it is necessary    to analyze the behavior of agribusiness exports from the point of view of the    innovative strategies adopted by companies in the multiple segments of the processing    industry of agriculture and stockbreeding products.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="3"><b>Bibliography</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">ARCHIBUGI, D. e MICHIE, J. <i>Trade, Growth and    Technical change</i>, Cambridge: University Press, Cambridge, 1998.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">CEPAL, WORLD BANK, TradeCan. <i>Comércio Global    crescerá 7,5%; produto agrícola processado é destaque</i>, 2005. Valor Econômico,    17/18/19.09.2004, pg. A14.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">DAVIS, J. H. e GOLDBERG, R. A. <i>A Concept of    Agribusiness, </i>Harvard University, 1957.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">FERRAZ, J. C.; KUPFER, D. e  HAGUENAUER, L. <i>Made    in Brazil: desafios competitivos para a indústria.</i> Rio de Janeiro: Campus,    1997.    </font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">FRIEDMANN, H. The political economy of food:    a global crisis<i>. New Left Review</i>, N. 197, 1993.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">FURTADO, A. Difusão tecnológica: um debate superado?.    <i>In</i>: PELAEZ, V. e SZMRECÁNYI, T. <i>Economia da inovação tecnológica.    </i>São Paulo: Hucitec, 2006.     </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">GRAZIANO DA SILVA, José<i>. A nova dinâmica da    agricultura brasileira</i>. Campinas: Unicamp, 1996.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">HENDERSON, D, R. <i>et al</i>., International    commerce in processed foods: patterns and curiosities. <i>In</i>: <i>Global    markets for processed foods: theoretical and practical issues</i>, PICK, D.    H; HENDERSON, D. R.; KINSEY, J. e SELDON, I. (eds.). Westview Press, 1998</font><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">HUMPHREY, J.; SCHMITZ, H.  Governance and upgrading:    linking industrial cluster and global value chain research. <i>Working Paper</i>,    n. 120, novembro de 2000.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">MAPA (Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento),    Intercâmbio Comercial do Agronegócio, 2008.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">MARTINELLI, O. <i>A globalização e a indústria    alimentar: </i>um estudo a partir das grandes empresas. São Paulo: Fapesp, 1999.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">MINISTÉRIO DA AGRICULTURA. <strong><i>Agronegócio    Brasileiro</i>: uma oportunidade de investimentos. </strong>Disponível em: &lt;<a href="http://www.agricultura.gov.br" target="_blank">http://www.agricultura.gov.br</a>.&gt;    Acesso em: 20 abril. 2006.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">PAULA, N. Challenges to the Brazilian agrofood    industry in the global market. <i>Revista de Economia</i>, v. 27, n.1 (25),    UFPR, 2001.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">PAULA, N. Structural change in Food Industry:    trends towards concentration. CMDE/UFPR. <i>Revista da Sober</i>, n. 1, 2000.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">PAVITT, K. Sectoral patterns pf technical change:    towards a taxonomy and a theory.  <i>Revista Brasileira de Inovação</i>, v.    2, n. 2, jul./ dez., 2003.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">POSSAS, M. An evolutionary approach to technological    innovation in agriculture: some preliminary remarks. <i>Cadernos de Ciência    &amp; Tecnologia</i>. Brasília, v. 11, n.1/3, 1994.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">REGMI, A.; GEHLHAR, M.; J. WAINIO; T. VOLLRATH,    P.; JOHNSTON, N. KATHURIA Market access for high-value foods. <i>In:    Agricultural Economic Report </i>n. 840<b>, </b>United States Department of    Agriculture, fevereiro de 2005. <a href="http://www.ers.usda.gov" target="_blank">www.ers.usda.gov</a>.        </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">REGMI, A.; GEHLHAR, M. (eds.) New directions    in food market. In: <i>Agricultural Information Bulletin</i>, n. 794, United    States Department of Agriculture, fevereiro de 2005. <a href="http://www.ers.usda.gov" target="_blank">www.ers.usda.gov</a>.    .</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">SUNDING e ZILBERMAN, <i>The agricultural innovation    process</i>: research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector.    Versão preliminar (mimeo), 2000.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">TRAILL, B. Globalisation in the food Industry.    <i>Discussion paper</i>, n. 26. <i>In</i>: Structural change in the European    food industry, University of Reading, 1996.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">TUBIANCA, L. World trade in agricultural products:    from global regulation to market fragmentation.<i> In</i>: GOODMAN, D.    E e REDCLIFT, M. R. <i>International farm crisis</i>, Londres: Macmillan, 1989.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">VALOR ECONÔMICO, Rio de Janeiro, 25.09.2006,    pg. B11.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">_______________.17/18/19.09.2004, p. A14.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">WARD, N.; ALMAS, R. Explaining change in the    international agrofood system. <i>In</i>:<i> Review of International Political    Economy n. </i>4: 4, 611-20, Summer 1997.    </font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><a name="nta1"></a><a href="#a1">*</a> Nilson    de Paula and is a professor in the Economics Department at the Federal University    of Paran&aacute;/Brazil    <br>   <a name="nta2"></a><a href="#a2">**</a> L&iacute;via Tiemi Bastos is graduated    in Economics by Federal University of Paran&aacute;/ Brazil    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref3" name="_ftn3" title="">1</a> According to Henderson <i>et al.</i> (1998), the period    from 1972 to 1993 saw a 574% value increase in the manufactured foods market,    compared to a 355% growth of commodities.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref4" name="_ftn4" title="">2</a> Keeping pace with the growing concentration of the    processed foods market, the 20 most important countries increased their participation    from 68% in 1962 to 80%, in 1990 (UNITED NATIONS, 1990).    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref5" name="_ftn5" title="">3</a> Sales of packaged foods in the United States, European    Union and Japan account for 60% of the world's total.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref6" name="_ftn6" title="">4</a> Between 1950 and 1998, there has been an increase    of 12% on the global <i>per capita </i>production of grains, simultaneously    to a duplication of the world's population and a reduction to half of the cultivated    territory <i>per capit</i>a (SUNDING e ZILBERMAN, 2000).    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref7" name="_ftn7" title="">5</a> According to Tubianca (1989), the restructuring of    global agriculture and its respective model of production and consumption was    established when countries engaged (even through in distinctive rhythms) in    capital intensive systems of production, marked by the incorporation of industrial    intermediate goods and genetically modified seeds. These transformations materialized    more intensely on cereal production aimed at feeding bovine, swine and bird    stocks, which has globally become their standard diet.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref8" name="_ftn8" title="">6</a> According Brazil's Ministry of Agriculture (2006),    Brazilian agribusiness answers for 33% of the GNP, 42% of exports and 37% of    labor. Although its participation on the global market is still low, Brazil    has had a highlighted performance of particular exports, such as sugar cane.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref9" name="_ftn9" title="">7</a> The sudden increase on demand for soy, corn and wheat    by the then Soviet Union, which raised global prices, winded up attracting other    competitors so far absent in the overall offer for these products, among each    Brazil figures centrally. Consequently, the participation of the United States    on global agricultural offers reduced meaningfully in mid-1970, reaching 20%,    half of what it had been in the previous decade (FRIEDMANN, 1993).    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref10" name="_ftn10" title="">8</a> In 2006, these three activities summed up 52% of    the total exports of Brazilian agribusiness.    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br>   <a href="#_ftnref11" name="_ftn11" title="">9</a> <a href="#an">Attachment 1</a> contains the main    products composing each of the segments.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref12" name="_ftn12" title="">10</a> The triennium 2002-04, the food exports were composed    by 35% of commodities, 28% of processed 1 and 38% of processed 2.</font></p>     <p><a name="an"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/s_esaa/v4nse/a07at1.gif"></p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ARCHIBUGI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MICHIE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Trade, Growth and Technical change]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge: University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>CEPAL, WORLD BANK, TradeCan</collab>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Comércio Global crescerá 7,5%: produto agrícola processado é destaque, 2005]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Valor Econômico]]></source>
<year>17/1</year>
<month>8/</month>
<day>19</day>
<page-range>A14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DAVIS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GOLDBERG]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A Concept of Agribusiness]]></source>
<year>1957</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard University]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERRAZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KUPFER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HAGUENAUER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Made in Brazil: desafios competitivos para a indústria]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[^eRio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Campus]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FRIEDMANN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The political economy of food: a global crisis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[New Left Review]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<numero>197</numero>
<issue>197</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FURTADO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Difusão tecnológica: um debate superado?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PELAEZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SZMRECÁNYI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Economia da inovação tecnológica]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[^eSão Paulo São Paulo]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hucitec]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GRAZIANO DA SILVA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A nova dinâmica da agricultura brasileira]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Unicamp]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HENDERSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D, R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[International commerce in processed foods: patterns and curiosities]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PICK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HENDERSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KINSEY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SELDON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Global markets for processed foods: theoretical and practical issues]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Westview Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUMPHREY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHMITZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Governance and upgrading: linking industrial cluster and global value chain research]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Working Paper]]></source>
<year>nove</year>
<month>mb</month>
<day>ro</day>
<numero>120</numero>
<issue>120</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>MAPA (Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento)</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Intercâmbio Comercial do Agronegócio]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARTINELLI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A globalização e a indústria alimentar: um estudo a partir das grandes empresas]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[^eSão Paulo São Paulo]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fapesp]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>MINISTÉRIO DA AGRICULTURA</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Agronegócio Brasileiro: uma oportunidade de investimentos]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PAULA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Challenges to the Brazilian agrofood industry in the global market]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Economia]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>25</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[UFPR]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PAULA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Structural change in Food Industry: trends towards concentration]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista da Sober]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PAVITT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Sectoral patterns pf technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Inovação]]></source>
<year>jul.</year>
<month>/ </month>
<day>de</day>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[POSSAS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[An evolutionary approach to technological innovation in agriculture: some preliminary remarks]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>1/3</numero>
<issue>1/3</issue>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[REGMI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GEHLHAR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WAINIO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VOLLRATH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[JOHNSTON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KATHURIA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Market access for high-value foods]]></article-title>
<collab>United States Department of Agriculture</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Agricultural Economic Report]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[REGMI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GEHLHAR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[New directions in food market]]></article-title>
<collab>United States Department of Agriculture</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Agricultural Information Bulletin]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SUNDING]]></surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZILBERMAN]]></surname>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The agricultural innovation process: research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TRAILL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Globalisation in the food Industry: Discussion paper, n. 26]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Structural change in the European food industry]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Reading]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TUBIANCA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[World trade in agricultural products: from global regulation to market fragmentation]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GOODMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[REDCLIFT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[International farm crisis]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Londres ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Macmillan]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>VALOR ECONÔMICO</collab>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>25.0</year>
<month>9.</month>
<day>20</day>
<page-range>B11</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[^eRio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>VALOR ECONÔMICO</collab>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>17/1</year>
<month>8/</month>
<day>19</day>
<page-range>A14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WARD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALMAS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Explaining change in the international agrofood system]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Review of International Political Economy]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>611-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
