<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0102-6909</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. bras. ciênc. soc.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0102-6909</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais - ANPOCS]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0102-69092010000100006</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Do social networks matter for the access to goods and services obtained outside markets?]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[As redes importam para o acesso a bens e serviços obtidos fora de mercados?]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Est-ce que les réseaux importent pour l'accès aux biens et services obtenus en dehors des marchés?]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marques]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eduardo]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A">
<institution><![CDATA[,  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>se</numero>
<fpage>0</fpage>
<lpage>0</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0102-69092010000100006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0102-69092010000100006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0102-69092010000100006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[This article discusses the role of social networks and sociability in poor people's access to goods and services obtained from outside the markets. The article uses qualitative information from research into social networks of poor individuals living in segregated places in São Paulo, as well as a control group of middle-class individuals. The results show the importance of networks and suggest that the help that mediates such access depends upon the types of ties and trust involved, as well as the cost of providing the help. The observed processes tend to reiterate inequalities, establishing circularities of poverty reproduction.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Este artigo discute o papel das redes sociais e da sociabilidade no acesso a bens e serviços obtidos por indivíduos pobres fora de mercados. São utilizadas informaçÃµes qualitativas de uma pesquisa sobre redes de indivíduos pobres que habitam locais segregados em São Paulo, além de indivíduos de classe média utilizados como controle. Os resultados comprovam a importância das redes e sugerem que as ajudas que medeiam os acessos são dependentes dos tipos de relação e confiança envolvidos, assim como dos custos de ajudar. As dinâmicas observadas tendem a reiterar desigualdades, constituindo circularidades de reprodução da pobreza.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Cet article aborde le rôle des réseaux sociaux et de la sociabilité dans l'accès aux biens et services obtenus par des individus pauvres en dehors des marchés. Nous avons, pour cela, utilisé des informations qualitatives d'une recherche à propos des réseaux d'individus pauvres qui habitent des quartiers ségrégés à São Paulo, outre les individus de classe moyenne, utilisés comme contrôle. Les résultats confirment l'importance des réseaux et suggèrent que les aides qui assurent la médiation aux accès sont dépendantes des genres de relation et de la confiance qui sont engagés, ainsi que des coûts de cette aide. Les dynamiques observées tendent à réaffirmer les inégalités et constituent, de ce fait, des circularités de reproduction de la pauvreté.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Poverty]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Sociability]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Social networks]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[São Paulo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Pobreza]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Sociabilidade]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Redes sociais]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[São Paulo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Pauvreté]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Sociabilité]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Réseaux sociaux]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[São Paulo]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font size="2" face="Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif">     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="4"><b>Do   social networks matter for the access to goods and services obtained outside   markets?</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>As redes importam para o acesso a bens e servi&ccedil;os obtidos fora de mercados?</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Est-ce que les r&eacute;seaux importent pour l'acc&egrave;s aux biens et services obtenus en dehors des march&eacute;s?</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Eduardo   Marques</b></p>     <p>Translated by David Rogers    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br>   Translation from <b><a href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-69092009000300003&lng=pt&nrm=iso" target="_blank">Rev. bras. Ci. Soc.</a></b><a href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-69092009000300003&lng=pt&nrm=iso">,&nbsp;vol.24&nbsp;no.71,&nbsp;S&atilde;o Paulo, Oct.&nbsp;2009</a>.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p>     <p>This   article discusses the role of social networks and sociability in poor people's   access to goods and services obtained from outside the markets. The article   uses qualitative information from research into social networks of poor   individuals living in segregated places in S&atilde;o Paulo, as well as a control   group of middle-class individuals. The results show the importance of networks   and suggest that the help that mediates such access depends upon the types of   ties and trust involved, as well as the cost of providing the help. The   observed processes tend to reiterate inequalities, establishing circularities of poverty reproduction.</p>     <p><b>Keywords:</b> Poverty; Sociability; Social networks; S&atilde;o Paulo.</p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p><b>RESUMO</b></p>     <p>Este artigo discute o papel das redes sociais e   da sociabilidade no acesso a bens e servi&ccedil;os obtidos por indiv&iacute;duos pobres fora   de mercados. S&atilde;o utilizadas informa&ccedil;&otilde;es qualitativas de uma pesquisa sobre   redes de indiv&iacute;duos pobres que habitam locais segregados em S&atilde;o Paulo, al&eacute;m de indiv&iacute;duos de classe m&eacute;dia utilizados como controle. Os resultados   comprovam a import&acirc;ncia das redes e sugerem que as ajudas que medeiam os   acessos s&atilde;o dependentes dos tipos de rela&ccedil;&atilde;o e confian&ccedil;a envolvidos, assim como   dos custos de ajudar. As din&acirc;micas observadas tendem a reiterar desigualdades, constituindo circularidades de reprodu&ccedil;&atilde;o da pobreza. </p>     <p><b>Palavras-chave:</b> Pobreza; Sociabilidade; Redes sociais; S&atilde;o Paulo.</p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p><b>R&Eacute;SUM&Eacute;</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Cet article aborde le r&ocirc;le des r&eacute;seaux sociaux et   de la sociabilit&eacute; dans l'acc&egrave;s aux biens et services obtenus par des individus   pauvres en dehors des march&eacute;s. Nous avons, pour cela, utilis&eacute; des informations   qualitatives d'une recherche &agrave; propos des r&eacute;seaux d'individus pauvres qui habitent   des quartiers s&eacute;gr&eacute;g&eacute;s &agrave; S&atilde;o Paulo, outre les individus de classe moyenne,   utilis&eacute;s comme contr&ocirc;le. Les r&eacute;sultats confirment l'importance des r&eacute;seaux et   sugg&egrave;rent que les aides qui assurent la m&eacute;diation aux acc&egrave;s sont d&eacute;pendantes   des genres de relation et de la confiance qui sont engag&eacute;s, ainsi que des coÃ»ts   de cette aide. Les dynamiques observ&eacute;es tendent &agrave; r&eacute;affirmer les in&eacute;galit&eacute;s et constituent, de ce fait, des circularit&eacute;s de reproduction de la pauvret&eacute;. </p>     <p><b>Mots-cl&eacute;s:</b> Pauvret&eacute;; Sociabilit&eacute;; R&eacute;seaux sociaux; &atilde;o Paulo.</p>   <hr size="1" noshade>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>This   article presents the results of a recent study on the social networks of poor   individuals living in segregated areas of S&atilde;o Paulo, Brazil. Social networks   are analytical representations of contexts and relationship patterns that   surround a given social situation. In the case of this study, the patterns in   question are those related to the everyday sociability of individuals. The   study addressed the social networks of 209 residents from seven underprivileged   neighborhoods of S&atilde;o Paulo, with varying conditions of segregation, and a   control group of thirty middle-class individuals. The aim was to investigate,   through qualitative and quantitative analyses, the characteristics and   variability of the social networks of these subjects and their effects upon   urban poverty. These effects were gauged from the impact the networks had in   terms of facilitating (or not) access to goods obtained from the markets   (Marques, 2008), and also to those goods and services important to processes of   social reproduction in situations of poverty and obtained through help and   social exchange extraneous to the logic of the markets (Marques, 2010).Â  In   doing so, social networks produce and enhance social and political inequalities, even amongst the poor.</p>     <p>In   this article I will discuss the role networks play in ensuring access to goods   and services obtained from outside the markets. The information used herein was   collated from in-depth interviews conducted with 20 interviewees from the   original pool, and covering a range of types of network and sociability. I   presented the interviewees with their networks as previously drawn up and asked   them to discuss how they mobilize those networks in order to obtain varied   forms of assistance in their everyday lives. Questions were asked concerning   migration (including intra-urban moves), house-building, small-scale repairs,   help looking after children or the house, aid in times of ill health, the   lending of provisions and money, trust and emotional support, match-making,   help finding work and information on politics, services and public policies.</p>     <p>I   begin the article by establishing certain conceptual platforms required for the   construction of my argument. I will then describe the main research procedures   adopted and provide a summary of previous results. The third section will   discuss the types of help provided by and to individuals, with special   reference to personal networks. The results reveal the existence of patterns of   network mobilization in the act of obtaining social and political assistance.   The text will elaborate on these patterns, though all of the names used herein   are aliases. By way of conclusion, I will then summarize the main patterns   identified throughout the study.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3">Exchanges,   help and trust</font></b></p>     <p>In   this section I conceptually define the core elements involved in these   assistance relations, namely: exchange, trust, reciprocity and intimacy. The   aim is not to conduct a detailed conceptual discussion of these categories   within the social sciences, or to discuss at length the types of relationship   that underpin given social situations, but rather to establish the conceptual   bedrock required to understand the subsequent analysis. On the other hand, the   study did not attempt to arrive at native categories, but merely to analyze   these important processes whilst taking into account the interviewees' own   interpretations, without any pretension towards reproducing them.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The   assistances analyzed here consist of acts of exchange. In the sense suggested   by the classic contribution of Homans (1958) "social behavior is â€¦ exchange",   but not necessarily based only on rewards and costs and certainly involving   only intentionality. These exchanges are intrinsically social (Polanyi, 1980)   and involve the swapping of material and immaterial elements, as well as   possessing certain symbolic dimensions.Â  Social help and support automatically   involve exchange, as they hinge upon the logic of reciprocity, just like those   originally studied by Marcel Mauss. In the sense underscored by the   anthropological tradition of gift, the elements involved in these exchanges   shape whole conjuncts of ample social and symbolic meanings that, in their   original formulations, provided interpretive keys to wide-reaching societal   elements (Mauss, [1923] 2003).</p>     <p>In   a more specific sense, these exchanges differ amongst themselves in terms of   their more or less impersonal character, spanning a continuum that goes from   generalized or impersonal exchanges to the most personalized, restricted and   non-transferable (Uehara, 1990; Nunes, 1997), in which the attributes of those   involved in the transaction are key. Mercantile exchanges, which can be   mediated by money or some other 'currency', are the most intensely impersonal,   even if they always involve social relations and, as such, are mediated by a   bevy of social, material and symbolic processes (Weber, [1922] 1999; Polanyi,   1980). It is reasonable to assume that, in contexts of poverty, in which   diverse types of informality abound in mercantile exchange, the level of   impersonality should be lesser. In which case, the economy of exchanges should   prevail in the exchanges of the economy<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><sup>1</sup></a>.</p>     <p>Most of   the conditions of life in the city involve mercantile exchanges, which leads to   the obvious conclusion that those with lower incomes (less well-positioned on   the jobs market) encounter greater difficulty in obtaining and maintaining good   social conditions. The relationship between the networks and the elements that   mediate mercantile exchanges (mainly income and employment) have been treated   elsewhere (Marques, 2008; 2010) and will not be discussed here anew. However,   assistance-based forms of exchange can improve the living conditions and   resolve the quotidian problems of low-income individuals, those who do not have   the economic means to buy goods and services through normal market   channels.</p>     <p>These   transactions involve the exchange of both material goods, such as money,   provisions, tools, and other such items, and immaterial goods, such as   information, affection, solidarity, emotional support, etc. Furthermore, all   such transactions clearly possess symbolic dimensions, such as recognition and   prestige. These exchanges do not always involve similar goods or services, and   may not necessarily be immediate, which factors indebtedness into the equation   of social reciprocity. In a sense, relational patterns are always exchange   networks, not only because of what can be channeled through these   relationships, but also through the reciprocity involved and the levels of   trust and intimacy that sustain them over time. Additionally, the status of   these relations can also be transformed by the changing dynamics of exchange,   reciprocity and trust, as we shall see further on.</p>     <p>On   the other hand, all types of help come at some species of cost to the giver.   This cost may include material resources, such as money and goods, but will   also involve the time spent in rendering assistance, as well as the operational   and emotional investments that entails. Obviously, the costs incurred through these   practices are mediated by the existing conditions of reciprocity and can be   mitigated, in part, by the types of tie involved. In this sense, the more   costly the assistance rendered, the more dependent it will be upon the   existence of certain types of tie and levels of trust capable of mediating that   reciprocity (offering greater or lesser assurance that one can rely on future   payback). However, as I shall show further on, the presence of social   reciprocity and trust does not necessarily exclude monetary payments.Â Â  </p>     <p>By   trust I understand the surety that one's expectations regarding a given   relationship will be met, whatever they may be. For some interviewees,   homophily<a href="#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2"><sup>2</sup></a> is a condition of trust - with individuals claiming only to trust those who   share their attributes (or behaviors). For others, there are different types of   trust, associated with specific social situations. Analysis of the cases   suggested that, depending on the situation; expectations vary according with   types of tie, with each requiring its own amount of trust. Of these types,   three were identified: personal, professional and political/associative.</p>     <p>The   first of these is the most common and concerns how dependable the ego considers   its contacts to be with regard to matters of a personal nature. This is   associated with intimacy, but only depends on it in relations of trust, as we   shall see. Professional trust is the surety the ego has that its contacts will   uphold their part of the bargain in professional activities. This type of trust   featured heavily in interviews with small business owners and others who rely   on regular work colleagues. Finally, political/associative trust, which   appeared less frequently than the other two, involves the assurance that one's   contacts will deliver on promises made in relation to activities, alliances and   political disputes. In all of these cases, trust may occur in horizontal or   vertical relations, being compatible with disparities of power and   hierarchy.</p>     <p>Different   degrees of trust, in turn, are usually associated with different forms of   reciprocity. Most of the time, low-trust assistance is associated with the   moral and impersonal reciprocity typical of group belonging, as per what   Blokland (2003) calls attachments (after Weber [1922] 1999) - i.e.,   non-instrumental relationships based on rationality and the value of belonging   to groups circumscribed within shared identities. It is also associated with   more instrumental relationships based on reciprocity via direct barter; or what   Luciano, an interviewee from the Jaguar&eacute; shantytown, called 'give-and-take'   relationships.Â  Whilst the relationships that bind the former are linked with   both rationality (deliberate and conscious action) and values, the latter are   based on rational, goal-oriented actions in a manner similar to that defined by   Blokland (2003), after Weber ([1922] 1999). At the other end of the spectrum,   relations that involve high levels of trust are associated with specific   exchanges and reciprocity that may be distributed over time and involve   different material and immaterial goods. In this case, the reciprocity is wholly personalized and underpinned by a specific type of personal tie.</p>     <p>Intimacy,   on the other hand, also rests upon the assurance that the other will uphold   his/her part of the bargain, but its focus is on matters of a personal nature   that require confidentiality derived from a high degree of trust. In the words   of Jo&atilde;o, a resident of the Cidade Tiradentes housing complex, "intimacy is an   open game". Unlike trust, intimacy can only feature in relationships in which differences in hierarchy or power remain slight.</p>     <p>In   addition to the different costs of providing assistance, other factors that   influence access to help - and therefore to the impact it can have on living   conditions and poverty - are the array of types of tie and degrees of trust   present in relationships.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3">Design of the study and earlier results</font></b></p>     <p>The   study traced the personal networks of 209 individuals living in poverty and of   thirty middle-class individuals by way of comparative control.Â  In order to   study the effects of spatial segregation upon social networks I chose seven   very different locations in terms of distance from the center, degree of   consolidation, construction/real estate patterns and levels of State   intervention, taking earlier studies on poverty in S&atilde;o Paulo as a base (CEM/SAS   2004) in making this selection. I opted to study personal networks as opposed   to community or ego-based networks<a href="#_ftn3" name="_ftnref3"><sup>3</sup></a>,   as I believe that a significant portion of the sociability that influences   poverty does not take place near the ego's immediate surroundings<a href="#_ftn4" name="_ftnref4"><sup>4</sup></a>.</p>     <p>Thirty   interviews were conducted per locale between September 2006 and August 2007.   The study areas included central slums, four shantytowns - Vila Nova Jaguar&eacute;,   Parais&oacute;polis, Vila Nova Esperan&ccedil;a and Guinle -   one irregular settlement in Jardim &Acirc;ngela, and the Cidade Tiradentes housing   block. A middle-class control group was also interviewed, though at no specific   location. In fact, the localization of the middle class indicates a high degree   of concentration around the expanded center of the metropolis, though the   individual networks can range much further afield and do not include neighbors, configuring what Wellman (2001) calls "personal communities".</p>     <p>The   interviews used a semi-open questionnaire and a name generator and interviewees   were selected at random during visits to the study locations, made both on   weekdays and at weekends<a href="#_ftn5" name="_ftnref5"><sup>5</sup></a>. The   middle-class participants were selected from a wide spectrum, seen as the sole   aim in their inclusion was to serve as a standard of comparison in the analysis   of the other networks.</p>     <p>This   data was handled using social network analysis tools, resulting in 239 personal   networks<a href="#_ftn6" name="_ftnref6"><sup>6</sup></a>.   After running the statistical analyses, I intentionally chose a set of twenty   personal networks to comprise the qualitative part of the study, combining   types of network, locale and interviewee profile<a href="#_ftn7" name="_ftnref7"><sup>7</sup></a>.The   present article explores this qualitative information, revealing patterns   associated with the networks and sociability that mediate the access of these   individuals to goods and services obtained from outside the markets.</p>     <p>Before   we go any further, however, I will briefly present the main results from the   earlier stages of the study, so as to better position the reader.</p>     <p>First   of all, when compared with the middle-class networks, the personal networks of   the poor tended to be smaller, more local and less varied in terms of   sociability. Inter-relations between different social and income groups   practically do not exist. This is one of the core characteristics of the   reproduction of poverty and social inequality, but does not derive from the   networks themselves, but rather represents a relational facet of Brazilian   social structure.</p>     <p>By   way of illustration, the following sociograms present the networks of two   women, one poor (<a href="#fig1">Figure 1</a>) and the other middle-class (<a href="#fig2">Figure 2</a>), that serve as   representative examples of each group. Sociograms are graphic representations   of tie patters, in which entities (people, groups, companies, organizations)   feature as nodes and relations (of any type) as lines (the ties). As we can   see, the first network is smaller, simpler, less clustered and more   ego-centered than the second.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><a name="fig1"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/s_rbcsoc/v5nse/a06fig1.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a name="fig2"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/s_rbcsoc/v5nse/a06fig2.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>The   analysis showed that there are no direct connections between socioeconomic   variables and relationship patterns. The networks are   influenced by such conditioning socio-economic factors as sex, age, educational   level, income, migration, church membership or association and segregation   itself, albeit in an indirect and combined manner, generating an intricately   complex pattern<a href="#_ftn8" name="_ftnref8"><sup>8</sup></a>.Â    These conditioning factors tend to make themselves felt through circularities   that perpetuate social situations and relationships and reproduce inequalities   in a way that is persistent but not necessarily categorical in Tilly's sense of   the word (2005).</p>     <p>Considering   the variability encountered among these networks, I developed two basic   typologies of the networks and of the sociability patterns. The findings   suggest that, while the networks of poor individuals are generally smaller,   more local and less varied than those of their middle-class counterparts, they   nonetheless vary greatly amongst themselves. If, on one hand, many of these   networks present patterns of sociability both highly local and based on primary   ties (of family, neighborhood and friendship), a considerable portion also   presents a less local sociability, largely generated within organizational or   institutional environments (work, church, union). The overlapping of these   heterogeneities suggests the existence of ampler relational patterns, with   varied sociability and potentially lower homophily.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>So,   in addition to major differences between the group averages, networks and   sociability patterns also varied considerably within each group. The following sociograms   illustrate the networks of two poor individuals that reveal widely different   relational patterns. In <a href="#fig3">Figures 3</a> and <a href="#fig4">4</a>, the symbology of the nodes and   clusters shows the spheres of sociability in which the ego meets with each   individual member of the network.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a name="fig3"></a></p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/s_rbcsoc/v5nse/a06fig3.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a name="fig4"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/s_rbcsoc/v5nse/a06fig4.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>The   analysis that followed specified the impacts the networks had on social and   economic conditions. It became clear that employment, including jobs with   greater levels of protection, and the absence of social precariousness, tend to   be positively influenced by less local and less primary patterns of   sociability, unlike more traditional variables, such as levels of schooling,   age and income, which did not feature as significant. In addition, alongside   the traditional variables, networks and sociability help to explain individual   revenues. The results of the multivariate analysis revealed the significance of   such factors as household size and educational level. In   addition, however, three other network variables associated with networks also   showed themselves to be relevant, namely: 1) the type of network and   sociability (average, varied networks with not so local and less primary   sociability); 2) network size; and 3) variability of sociability; items 2 and 3   interacting, respectively, with stable incomes and segregation. Average-sized   networks with less local or primary sociability have positive effects on income   (Marques, 2009; 2010). In the case of some segregated individuals, this effect   is strengthened by the presence of varied sociability, which helps combat the   social isolation produced by segregation.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, it remained to be better understood how these   individuals in their daily lives mobilized these networks, since networks are   passive structures that are mobilized differently by individuals and   considering situations and cirscunstances. The following section, which is   based on the qualitative material collated by the study, makes progress in this   direction by exploring the use and mediation of sociabilities and networks in   the individuals' access to goods and services obtained outside the markets.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3">Access   to assistance</font></b></p>     <p>Information   drawn from the interviews suggest that the assistance that mediates access toÂ    both markets and social support can be grouped according to an overlap between   trust, cost and type of reciprocity. Depending on the situation, the   reciprocity and trust involved assume a range of shapes and aspects, and the   exchange can be more or less personalized. On the other hand, in the specific   case of returning each specific favor, the costs, obviously not restricted to   monetary dimensions, acquire distinct contents, often mixing prestige,   affection, expectation of retribution and money. Another relevant dimension to   these costs is the time and personal availability spent in providing the help,   as well as its frequency or perpetuity. As such, while relatively little wealth   circulates in the world of the poor, the provision of high-cost assistance is very common.</p>     <p>There   is an often tenuous line between what is purely a market-structured purchase   and what constitutes exchange via social reciprocity, albeit also involving   cash payments. In the first case, even though the individuals may know each   other, the transaction is purely the purchase of a good or service that could   just as well be procured elsewhere. On the other hand, we have social exchanges   that may also involve payment, even between very close individuals. In this   case, the money is simply one of the dimensions involved in the exchange, which   is not generalized, but specific and personalized by the ties of trust   involved. Apparently, these cash payments constitute retributions that help   reduce the cost of the favor rendered, in addition to such other factors as   increased prestige and affection or pay-back for, or the promise of, assistance   past or future, in the context of reciprocity.</p>     <p>Considering   these dimensions, there are basically three types of observable help:   immediate, low-cost help; more constant and costly help; and help involving   trust and intimacy. In what follows I will discuss each in detail, illustrated,   wherever possible, with examples from the interviews. In general terms, as we   move from type one to type three, the required level of trust and tie strength   increases, as does the cost incurred. Each type of help is associated with a   specific form of reciprocity.</p>     <p><i>More immediate, low-cost forms of help that require low trust investment</i></p>     <p>This   type include help in times of ill-health, the lending of tools and provisions,   looking after someone's home while they are away, as well as the passing-on of   information about services and jobs. Â It is typically associated with ties   of acquaintance, in which contact is frequent but superficial; the kind Luciano   from the Jaguar&eacute; shantytown describes as "Hi, how's it going" relationships. In   general, this kind of help occurs in relationships with a low degree of   personalization and only distant reciprocity. Most of the ties involved are   neighborhood-based and easily broken, especially through changes of residence.   However, they are also easy to replace at the new residence, though the   interviewee may express a preference for those at one locale or the other. The   ties that sustain this kind of help basically function as impersonal supports   for relations of reciprocity in the provision of everyday assistance. As such, they do not require trust, and the reciprocity is tenuous.</p>     <p>At   the root of this type of help lies a diffuse sense of solidarity. If we   consider that all types of solidarity are associated with identities, in this   case we would be talking about a loose identity or sense of belonging to a   large group, such as "we of the community", "the poor", "the brothers of faith"   or even just "the human race".Â  The discourse that emerges from the interviews   to justify this kind of aid is associated with this sense of belonging to a   wider group. As Jo&atilde;o from the Cidade Tiradentes housing complex puts it, "when   it comes to being sick, even your enemies have compassion". Health crises are a   perfect illustration for this kind of situation, in which one can often count   on the help of neighbors, who might lend a car or drive the sick person to   hospital, as in cases related by L&uacute;cia, David, Luciano and Rafaela, from the   slums and shantytowns of Parais&oacute;polis, Jaguar&eacute; and Vila Nova Esperan&ccedil;a,   respectively. The ties that channel this kind of aid are normally those that Blokland (2003) calls attachments.</p>     <p>Even   though this type of help does not require a base of prior trust, it can be withheld   from those who have failed to provide the minimal requirements of reciprocity   in the past, whether in a personalized or a generalized form. In the words of   Jo&atilde;o, from Cidade Tiradentes, "I always used to lend tools, but I don't do it   anymore, because people don't return them". Conversely, the provision of   assistance during a health crisis can serve to deepen the relationship between   individuals, boosting one's trust in the person who came to one's aid and   perhaps even establishing a higher degree of intimacy. So while neither trust   nor intimacy are required in order for someone to provide this type of   assistance, given its practically impersonal character, both can be positively (or negatively)Â  impacted by the provision (or not) of such help.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Passing   on information about employment opportunities can be associated with all three   types of help, but it is often conveyed via ties equipped for only immediate,   low-cost assistance, especially when it comes to more local vacancies. In its   most extreme form, such information can even come from complete strangers. In   the case of Jo&atilde;o, for example, the information that led to his getting a job   was given to him in a park by someone he had never met before, while for   Ednalva, from the Parais&oacute;polis shantytown, it came from someone she met on the   bus. Maria, an unemployed woman from the Jaguar&eacute; shantytown, who used to   collect recyclables to make ends meet, secured a cleaning job thanks to   information from an acquaintance she made when she started to attend a new church.   It costs nothing to convey this kind of information and it can be propagated   through the weakest possible connections and sometimes even by chance   encounters, in a manner similar to the weak ties described by Granovetter (1973).</p>     <p>Specifically   in this respect, certain locations where information circulates more freely   tend to generate potential intersections between the networks of individuals   who barely know each other, if at all. In this case, it is not the effect of   the network of any given ego, but rather of specific shared spaces that make it   possible to tap the networks of people outside one's own network. Antonio's   hairdresser's is a case in point. Antonio is also a pastor   and the director of a community organization in Parais&oacute;polis. According to the   interviewees, that particular space represents an important venue for   information exchange and serves as a point of convergence. The same may occur   around individuals who are known to have extensive networks. Rafaela, from Vila   Nova Esperan&ccedil;a, and Ant&ocirc;nio and Jorge, from Parais&oacute;polis, say they are often   approached by people, sometimes even strangers, looking for information about   job vacancies. All three are, incidentally, community leaders with involvement in associative activities.</p>     <p>However,   it is important here to highlight a key difference in relation to the results   of Granovetter's influential work. The author's arguments about the importance   of weak ties to the job-seeker are based on the idea that if a given ego has   been unemployed for a certain amount of time, any job that does eventually come   his way will not come via strong ties - because if these had such potential, he   would probably not have remained unemployed for so long. Technically speaking,   the argument derives from an empirical regularity observed by Granovetter and   dubbed the "forbidden open triad": if a given ego has a strong relationship   with A and another with B, it is highly unlikely that A and B should have no   relationship at all. New information is therefore far more likely to reach you   through weak ties than through strong ones<a href="#_ftn9" name="_ftnref9"><sup>9</sup></a>.</p>     <p>In   apparent contradiction of Granovetter's findings, a significant number of the   higher-quality jobs found by the interviewees came via strong ties, even family   ties. However, the evidence largely refers to the first jobs of newly-arrived   migrants or first-time job seekers. It all comes down to the fact that, when   these individuals draw for the first time upon the networks that absorb them   (or integrate young adults into the labor market), new information about job   opportunities comes from both strong and weak ties.<a href="#_ftn10" name="_ftnref10"><sup>10</sup></a>Â This effect tends to be particularly strong for low-skilled individuals on the   brink of survival, for whom virtually any job can make all the difference.</p>     <p>Examples   of such cases are Ana Luiza, Luciano, Jo&atilde;o, Rafaela, L&uacute;cia and David, who   obtained jobs at important times thanks to information channeled through   relatives. In the case of the first four, these jobs were secured when they   arrived in S&atilde;o Paulo from the Northeast<a href="#_ftn11" name="_ftnref11"><sup>11</sup></a>, while for David and L&uacute;cia, it was when they began their working lives in S&atilde;o Paulo in their late teens.</p>     <p>Despite   having this point in common, their trajectories (and their consequences) are   very different. With the help of a relative, Ana Lu&iacute;za found a steady job in a   clothes shop selling brideswear in the center of S&atilde;o Paulo, but what she really   wanted was to become self-employed. After some time working, she learned how to   make wedding garlands with the help of some friends and left her job. She has   been working from home ever since, drawing upon contacts she made during her   time at the shop. In addition to her higher income, she now has control over   her own work and no longer needs to commute each day from Vila Nova Esperan&ccedil;a   to the city center.Â  The case of Luciano is also worthy of mention. After   working with his brothers at a bakery in a middle-class neighborhood near Vila   Nova Jaguar&eacute;, he too started his own business. After a critical period during   which he had to contract heavy debts and sell his house to pay them off, he now   finds himself in a highly prosperous situation in relative terms. Jo&atilde;o, from   Tiradentes, also got his first job in S&atilde;o Paulo through a relative - a   brother-in-law working at a carpenter's shop. However, Jo&atilde;o's future turned out   to be far less prosperous than those of Ana Lu&iacute;za and Luciano. Lastly, Rafaela,   from Vila Nova Esperan&ccedil;a, was helped into work by an aunt at two key moments:   first, when she arrived in S&atilde;o Paulo from the Northeast, only to move back a year later; and again when her pendular migration brought her back to S&atilde;o Paulo.</p>     <p>The   effects for first-time job seekers in S&atilde;o Paulo would appear to be rather   similar. David fell out with his father during his late teens and left the   family home in Parais&oacute;polis. He secured his first job, in a photography store,   with the help of his sister. L&uacute;cia's two sons got their first jobs at a car tire mechanic's workshop near Vila Nova Esperan&ccedil;a thanks to an uncle.</p>     <p>The   first two cases - those of Ana Lu&iacute;zia and Luciano - show that future planning   can also play an important role in the individual's ability to milk the   relational opportunities that arise. The presence or otherwise of this planning   is associated with the cultural mindsets through which the individual sees   society and his/her situation, in the sense of Lamont and Small (2008, p. 8),   i.e.:Â  "an interpretive schema that simplifies and condenses the social   reality, selectively choosing and codifying objects, situations, events,   experiences, and sequences of action".Â  In both of the abovementioned cases,   the interviewees planned their insertion in accordance with the situations in   which they found themselves,Â  and this enabled them to use the knowledge   acquired in the bakery and clothes shop to start their own businesses as owner and autonomous professional, respectively.</p>     <p>On   the other extreme we find people who adopt a far more passive posture before   their futures; a situation well illustrated by Jo&atilde;o, from Tiradentes, who had   long and important relationships with people who were out of work but did   little to improve their lot. In his own words, his partner from a nine-year   relationship "didn't fight". For Jo&atilde;o, many people "have no ambition, or maybe   it's a lack of gumption or plain laziness. I mean normal ambition, to have a house,   a wardrobe to hang your things in". Yet it is not exclusively a matter of   effort, but also one of planning: these people "only remember to eat when   they're hungry. That's not how it works; that you just remember to plant when   you're already hungry". I believe that this behavior can be viewed not simply   as the product of choices, but also as the adaptive cognitive result of an   accumulation of precarious situations experienced over the course of certain peoples' lifetimes, thus reducing their degree of freedom and choices.</p>     <p>Another   aspect worth mentioning is help in gaining access to public services and policy   benefits. The information does not suggest the existence of personalized help   involving electoral reciprocity in obtaining public services and policy   benefits, contrary to what is asserted in the vast literature on political   clientelism. Confirming the results of earlier studies on access to public   services and policy benefits in S&atilde;o Paulo (Figueiredo, Torres &amp; Bichir,   2006), there was no evidence of intermediation, whether personal, political or of any other form, associated with relations of electoral reciprocity.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>This   tendency is connected with the universalization of access to the most basic   public services and policy benefits in the recent Brazilian history since the   return to democracy, as already demonstrated in specific studies on the theme   (Figueiredo, Torres &amp; Bichir, 2006; Figueiredo <i>et al.</i>, 2005, for   example). However, that does not mean that social exchanges associated with   such access do not exist, but rather indicates, in counterpart, that such   benefits have been reformulated as rights as opposed to electorally negotiable   currency. This distinction is conceptually important, as the tradition of   studies in this area is to assume the presence of political clientelism   wherever access to these benefits involves some form of exchange. As we know,   social relations always involve exchanges, which paints as somewhat naive the   interpretation of the institutionalization of public policies as a social   unraveling of the relations between the State and society. Suffice it to recall   all the social dimensions involved in the implementation of public policies   through street-level bureaucracy as enumerated by Lipsky (1980).<a href="#_ftn12" name="_ftnref12"><sup>12</sup></a></p>     <p>The   crux of the matter is what circulates in exchanges associated with policy   access, not how socially "disincarnate" those exchanges may or may not be.   Clientelism is defined by the establishment of relations in which help toward   access to policy benefits is exchanged for electoral support. And it is   precisely this dimension that is affected by the universalistic expansion of   access to public policy benefits, seen as the electoral value of this support   plummets when the benefits are understood to be - and more importantly, are felt   to be - rights of the citizen.</p>     <p>As   such, even in the absence of electioneering in the classical sense, the   interviews frequently presented cases of institutional referrals that were   personal in character. One such case was that of Carlos, a young resident from   a S&atilde;o Paulo slum, and his school headmistress, who had him transferred to a   better school. This also occurred with Marta, another resident of the slums,   who managed to get onto a computer course thanks to the mediation of the   director of the municipal cr&egrave;che attended by her son. Along similar lines,   policy technicians can serve important functions with regard to other public   initiatives, explaining procedures and forwarding people for attendance, as in   the case of community health agents (Lotta, 2006).Â  Furthermore, contacts with   community networks and associations also help channel this kind of assistance,   especially in the personal networks of the poor or elderly. In one of the study   areas, the local parish priest doubled as a powerful social and political   leader, occupying the role of mediator between the local sphere and the formal universe of the institutions.</p>     <p>As   these exchanges involve reciprocity, individuals that produce such mediation   frequently achieve projection and distinction, especially among the poor and   the elderly, who depend more on this kind of support. However, in all of these   cases, it is more a case of making information available and providing   assistance with red tape (which can pose a huge obstacle to this social group)   than of intermediation in the classical sense, associated with forms of   reciprocity with some electoral return.</p>     <p><i>More constant, crucial and costly help</i></p>     <p>This   type of help includes chronic situations of ill-health that require constant   attention; daily child care; housework; help with migration; and loans of small   sums. In all of these cases, it amounts to a relatively costly (though not   necessarily financially so) activity for the provider. The cases studied   indicate that there is often payment involved, even for people very close to   the recipient (siblings, parents, good friends, etc). I see these payments as a   way of mitigating the burden of cost incurred by the helper, but such exchanges   should not be misconstrued as any old mercantile transaction, as they involve   reciprocity and depend upon trust. In this sense, the provision of this kind of   assistance in a purely mercantile and de-personalized form constitutes   something quite different. In the case of the middle class, such costly help is   frequently sourced from the market, through cr&egrave;ches, nannies, nurses, builders   and bank loans. In the case of the poor, market-mediated hirings are limited to   specialist construction services. All other forms of assistance are provided socially and in accordance with the logics of reciprocity and trust.</p>     <p>Looking   after the kids while the parents go out to work is a service usually rendered   by family members, including elder siblings or neighbors, with or without cash   payment. In the case of Jorge, from Parais&oacute;polis, the task was always a paid   one carried out by a sister-in-law, while for Maria, from the poorest area of   Jaguar&eacute;, it was her neighbors who took care of the kids, also on a paid basis. Maria   once remarked: "no-one does that for free". Jorge   and his wife never needed anyone to look after the children on a daily basis,   but his sister-in-law does the school-run in return for a monthly payment. On   the other hand, some cases did relate unpaid childcare by neighbors, though   with not infrequent accounts of mistreatment. Hence trust is such an important   dimension in this kind of assistance, although many people have nobody in a position of trust to assume the task.</p>     <p>Care   for the seriously ill also involves high costs and levels of trust. The same   can be said of post-natal care for women with newly-born children. In these   cases, it is almost always the family that provides the support. When a   post-natal mother lives far away from her family and does not have a strong   personal network to draw from, she tends to move back to the family   temporarily, even if this means going to worse living conditions. In a case   reported by Carlos, his sister, who lives in a good house outside the slum,   moved back to the family shack during the later stages of a high-risk   pregnancy, sharing a room with the interviewee, his brother and their   mother.</p>     <p>It   has to be noted that, contrary to the process of self-help construction widely   narrated in the literature during the 70s and 80s (Kowarick, 1979), no cases   arose of mutual community help in house-building. While some interviewees said   their houses were originally built in this way (partially or completely), the   vast majority of these descriptions, and all descriptions of more recent   events, indicates the hiring of builders or some collective, but not community   effort. By collective process I understand the assistance of a small but select   group based on personal reciprocity, which is quite different from community   processes, which involve the participation of a large number of people and rest   on the fundamental principle of identity or solidarity.Â  In most of the cases   identified by the study, the construction was carried out by family members and   close friends, with some payment being made, especially to those rendering   specialist services (electrics and plumbing), though these were almost always   hired from the market at local prices and in an impersonal manner.Â  The cases   of Jorge, L&uacute;cia and Rafaela are illustrative. Jorge, a community leader in   Parais&oacute;polis, received help from only his wife's uncle and his brother-in-law   when building his house, but he had to pay them. L&uacute;cia also received help from   in laws and her son, while Rafaela had only her husband and brothers to help   her build their wooden shack in Vila Nova Esperan&ccedil;a. Rafaela has since sold the   shack to her sister and now lives in a brick house purchased with what she managed to save of her pay as a cleaner.</p>     <p>One   of the aspects to feature most regularly in the results is assistance with   migrations, particularly taking people in and helping them find their first job   in the new city. Sometimes the person receiving the migrant, usually a member   of the family or close friend from the old hometown, actually covers the costs   of the migration, whether on condition of repayment or otherwise. Some people   specialize in this type of help. L&uacute;cia, from Vila Nova Esperan&ccedil;a, spoke of how   her brother-in-law regularly received migrants arriving at the neighborhood,   both on a paid basis and free of charge. He even built some housing units at   the back of his lot so he could rent them out. Other people, such as the aunt   of Rafaela from Vila Nova Esperan&ccedil;a, do not charge for this assistance. This   aunt, once a recipient of such help herself, has put up various other members of the family. Her house is a "kind of hostel", says Rafaela.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The   accounts also showed that pendular migrations are fairly common. For example,   Luciano, from Jaguar&eacute;, Jos&eacute;, from the slums, and Rafaela, from Vila Nova   Esperan&ccedil;a, all migrated between S&atilde;o Paulo and their hometowns on various occasions.   Numerous other interviewees spoke of returning migrants. Jos&eacute;, from the slums,   and Jo&atilde;o, from Tiradentes, told of relatives who had come down to S&atilde;o Paulo only to fail to adapt and return home. In Jo&atilde;o's words, they "don't settle here,   because south of the Northeast it's another country. It's all very different".Â Â  </p>     <p>There   were also many cases of intra-city moves, often involving assistance from   friends or relatives in other parts of the city. These moves may be spurred by   conflicts with the family that had originally taken the migrant in, or by the   pursuit of better urban and professional insertion. However, the migrant's   first base would seem to be pivotal in determining professional direction and   developing an urban employment track-record and an initial personal network.</p>     <p>Finally,   there are also small cash loans, with interviewees mentioning having lent or   borrowed sums of between R$1.00 and R$10.00 (0.5 and 6 US$). Most of the time these loans are made by and to family members or close friends, be   they from the neighborhood, work or church. Obviously, "you ask those you know   can afford it", says Jo&atilde;o from Tiradentes. In other words, the lenders are   close ties who are slightly better off financially. There may also be a certain   sense of shame involved. Jo&atilde;o, who lives alone and has no family support to   draw from, said that he has sometimes preferred to go to loan sharks than run   the risk of "being turned down by someone I love, which would be the death of me".</p>     <p>In   the case of shop owners, these requests would appear to be relatively common,   but Luciano, from Jaguar&eacute;, says that he only lends to "sound family men and   women with well-consolidated families. Basically, only to decent   folk". The practice is therefore subject to a moral   filter, otherwise "the money might go on drink, gambling or to feed   addictions". Many of the interviewees said the borrowers always pay the money   back, therefore maintaining the lender's trust and keeping the doors open for   future assistance. For shop owners who lend money, the main interest seems to   be in keeping good relations with the clientele. According to Luciano, "that   person is a client, and you don't want to upset the pie", but there is also a   very specific reciprocity, as "they are there in the day-to-day, helping out",   buying products. One important symbolic dimension here is the distinction and   respect earned by the regular lender. Jorge, who is a community leader in   Parais&oacute;polis, as well as a shop owner, says that "getting the money back varies   a lot from person to person. There are debts I don't even call in". In this   case, there is clearly an intrinsic asymmetry of relations (and in some cases   even of hierarchy), based on a reciprocity in which the formation and preservation of prestige play a central role.</p>     <p>As   this type of help involves trust and is personalized, individuals who provide   it are hard to replace. As such, severed or reduced contact with them   (increased physical distance, a shrinking economy of ties or various forms of   rupture) can result in a deterioration of conditions of support and create   social vulnerability (in extreme cases, even ostracism). Newly-arrived migrants   also tend to suffer from the difficulties experienced in securing this kind of   help, given their low degree of social insertion. The interviews revealed that   this was one of the prime benefits to be gained from taking in migrant   relatives. In addition to the proverbial "wanting the best for one's family",   as in the case of Jo&atilde;o from Tiradentes, who said he "brought [a relative] down,   because I saw, and still see, a lot of progress in S&atilde;o Paulo", the formation of   a physically expanded nuclear family can make life a lot easier, affording not   only emotional comfort, but also access to this kind of help, and that described in the following section.</p>     <p><i>Help that involves trust and intimacy</i></p>     <p>This   type of help involves loans of large sums of money, serving as a confidant, or   providing emotional and political support (for those involved in politics or   unions). The ties that channel this kind of assistance hinge upon trust and   intimacy. Most of the time, this level of trust involves social, political or even moral homophily.</p>     <p>Some   interviewees involved in commercial activities mentioned loans of significant   sums of money. In these cases, the loans had a strong mercantile motivation,   despite being interest-free, as they were associated with the purchase of a   stake in partnerships.Â  However, there was clearly a strong aspect of trust   involved, as is common in commercial partnerships, especially given the degree   of informality characteristic of this particular social sphere, where ties in   the economy are pervaded by the economy of ties. This trust rests upon a   homophily of behavior, as described by McPherson <i>et al.</i> (2001).   The ego will not necessarily lend money to those who are   close to him, but largely only to those with a similar character to his own,   and who can therefore be considered trustworthy in matters of commerce and   employment. Hence many of these cases are devoid of intimacy, involving people   whose only interaction is within the public sphere.</p>     <p>For   confidences and emotional support in more personal matters, the situation is   rather different. These cases generally involve what Luciano from Jaguar&eacute;   describes as "spicy" themes, or the kinds of moment Lucia from Vila Nova   Esperan&ccedil;a termed "times of precision". The first dimension of homophily in   these matters is gender - women confide in women and men in men. The exception   would appear to be among the young, where friends will sometimes have   confidants of the other gender. However, the highly selective nature of this   support means only very few individuals will qualify as providers of this kind of assistance, even among those closest to us.</p>     <p>Another   requisite for the establishment of relationships of extreme confidence is the   absence of asymmetry, as it would seem that only very balanced relationships   allow for this sort of help. In this sense, relationships of confidence with   certain family members may be out of the question, as the kind of proximity may   actually disqualify them as possible confidants or providers of emotional   support (though there are exceptions). An example of where this may not be   viable is between parents and children in traditional or patriarchal families,   in which hierarchy and authority are pillars of the relationship grammar.Â  That   said, confidant relationships between mothers and teenage or adult daughters   would seem to be very common and a key source of emotional support for both. As   already discussed, while trust may be present in relationships of authority,   intimacy is not, tending, therefore, to be the preserve of equals. I believe   this dimension is not exclusive to the social group analyzed here.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>An   additional element worth underscoring in relation to issues of secrecy and   emotional support is behavioral homophily, or, to use the words of Jo&atilde;o from   Tiradentes, "when you see eye to eye". To quote Luciano from Jaguar&eacute;: "for me,   trust is when someone has the same habits as you, likes the same things as you,   has the same fiber as you, frequents the same places as you and has the same   tastes as you". Hence it is far more likely that we will deposit trust in   people who share our beliefs, behaviors and practices. Examples of this   abounded, including youths confiding in peers with whom they had a lot in   common, homosexuals confiding in other homosexuals, evangelical Christians in   other evangelical Christians, and so on. This selectiveness seems to be   connected with the fact that, as these issues are often of a personal nature,   they will involve moral judgments mediated by the existence of a homophily of   behaviors and ideas. This homophily potentizes a sharing of languages and repertoires that makes it easier to understand the issues under discussion.<a href="#_ftn13" name="_ftnref13"><sup>13</sup></a></p>     <p>For   those interviewees involved in union or political party life, there was another   specific form of trust - political trust -, leveraged by a homophily of ideas   based on shared political views. These relationships are sometimes hierarchized,   such as between a leader and the members of the group he or she leads. While   there will often be trust in these relationships, there will rarely be personal   trust or intimacy. As David, a young man from Parais&oacute;polis, explains: "when it   comes to politics I find it hard to bring up [personal] matters, as these   people expect you to show a certain capacity, a certain strength, and so I keep   it to myself, as I wouldn't feel comfortable about them knowing my weaknesses".   The grammar of hierarchical relationships is less than compatible with intimacy.</p>     <p>In   the case of more costly, trust-based help, depletion in the number of people in   one's network capable of providing such assistance can create even more   dramatic problems than in the other two categories dealt with above. This   whittling may occur due to changes of address, but also due to a breach of   trust or loss of intimacy, leading to a reduced base of support, especially of   the emotional variety.Â  In extreme cases, this can even occur within the family   environment. This is exactly what happened to Cristina, a 24 year-old   unemployed mother of three from Tiradentes. At the time of our first interview,   she was living with her husband's family. A year later, she had been beaten by   her husband, fallen out with her in-laws and moved back with her parents, along   with her third child. Her two other children, now aged 9 and 11 (by other   fathers), had already been raised by her mother, but, in this case, it was not   so much a matter of help with childcare as de facto adoption, with Cristina   having relinquished all say over the kids' upbringing.</p>     <p>Cristina   claims that her family can't stand her husband, the father of her third child,   an unemployed gang member who frequently beat her. Whenever she was beaten by   him, her brothers would do the same to her husband, but she always ended up   going back to him. After this had happened several times, she lost all moral   credit with her family, leaving the ties unbroken but drained of the contents   she (and the family) would have expected of them. And so, today, even though   she lives in the family home, the interviewee is not on speaking terms with   most of the family members, who treat her with visible disdain. For a person in   a situation like this, ties capable of channeling emotional support and   trust-based assistance are practically obliterated. Cristina   is basically on the threshold of despair. As she says herself,   the only person who continues to help her is a resident of the same building   who took pity on her (diffuse and depersonalized solidarity). Nevertheless, the   bonds of family have proved so strong that her parents continue to feed her and   give her a home.</p>     <p>The   content of the ties in a given personal network can also increase the number of   potential providers of costly, trust-based assistance.Â  This can even occur as   the product of help previously rendered. One case recounted by Joana, a mother   of two who lives in a slum, illustrates the situation. Her neighbor, recently   moved in with no connections in the slum, had three small children and no-one   to look after them when she went to work. As she left the kids locked in a room   all day, one of the other neighbors called child support and the police arrived   to investigate. The interviewee went to fetch the kids from the room and hid them   from the police, saying that the denunciation was a hoax. Since that day, the   interviewee and the mother of the children have become very close friends and   help each other reciprocally.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3">Conclusion</font></b></p>     <p>Considering   the complexity of the pattern identified, in this conclusion I will summarize   the main dimensions involved. In general, the information suggests that help   varies according to the costs involved (material and immaterial) and the trust   required, understood here as the assurance that the other will meet one's expectations, whatever they may be.</p>     <p>At one   end of the scale, we have low-cost assistance that can be provided via   relationships that require little by way of trust, based merely on a diffuse   and impersonal solidarity. This group includes coming to someone's aid during a   health crisis, lending tools or provisions, keeping an eye on someone's house   while he/she is away and passing on information about jobs and services. This   type of help is usually channeled through relationships of acquaintance and   does not require any real levels of trust.</p>     <p>On an   intermediary level we have personalized assistance that involves significant   and/or constant cost and effort and a considerable amount of trust. In these   cases, cash payments are not infrequent, even to family members or close   friends, as a means of reducing the costs involved. As this is personalized   aid, those who provide it are hard to replace, and those with a low degree of   social insertion may face severe difficulties in securing this kind of assistance,   thus creating a vicious circle of inequality production.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Lastly,   we have high-cost, high-trust and highly personalized assistance. The key issue   here is support based on personal, professional or political trust. As the   relationships strong enough to provide this kind of help are relatively rare,   their absence may leave the individual in a position of serious vulnerability.</p>     <p>This   whole dynamic is somewhat circular and individuals with more precarious levels   of social insertion experience enormous difficulties in mobilizing more costly   forms of assistance, thus perpetuating social inequalities. On the other hand,   the provision of help at important times can actually change the content of   relationships, boosting trust and recalibrating ties for the provision of more   costly and intimate assistance.</p>     <p>&nbsp; </p>      <p><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3">Bibliography</font></b></p>     <p>Blokland, T. (2003), <i>Urban bonds</i>. London, Basil Blackwell.</p>     <!-- ref --><p>CEM/SAS.   (2004), <i>Mapa da vulnerabilidade social da popula&ccedil;&atilde;o da cidade de S&atilde;o Paulo</i>. S&atilde;o Paulo, CEM/Cebrap; SAS/PMSP; SESC.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Figueiredo, A.; Torres, H. &amp; Bichir, R. (2006), "A conjuntura social   brasileira revistada". <i>Novos Estudos Cebrap</i>, 75: 173-184.    </p>     <p>Figueiredo, A.; Torres, H.; Limongi,   F.; Arretche, M. e Bichir, R. (2005), "Relat&oacute;rio final,   Projeto BRA/04/052 - Rede de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento de Pol&iacute;ticas P&uacute;blicas: REDE-IPEA II" (mimeo.).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>Granovetter,   M. (1973), "The strength of weak ties". <i>American Journal of Sociology.</i> 78 (6):   1360-1380.    </p>     <p>Guimar&atilde;es, N. (2009), <i>Desemprego, uma constru&ccedil;&atilde;o social: S&atilde;o Paulo, Paris, T&oacute;quio</i>. Belo Horizonte: Argumentum Ed.</p>     <!-- ref --><p>Hanneman,   R. &amp; Riddle, M. (2005), <i>Introduction     to social network methods</i>. Riverside, CA, University of California.    </p>     <p>HOMANS, G. (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange. <i>American   Journal of Sociology, 63</i>, 597-606. </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Kowarick, L. (1979), <i>A espolia&ccedil;&atilde;o urbana</i>. Rio de Janeiro, Paz e Terra.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Lammont, M.   &amp; Small, M. (2008), "How   culture matters for the understanding of poverty: enriching our understanding", <i>in</i> D. Harris e A. Lin, <i>The colors of poverty</i>, Nova York, Russell   Sage Foundation.    </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>Lanna, M. (1995), <i>A d&iacute;vida divina: troca e   patronagem no Nordeste brasileiro</i>. Campinas,   Editora da Unicamp.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Lipsky, M.   (1980), <i>Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public     services</i>. Nova York, Russell Sage Foundation.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Lotta, G. (2006), <i>Saber e poder: agentes   comunit&aacute;rios de sa&uacute;de aproximando saberes locais e pol&iacute;ticas p&uacute;blicas</i>. S&atilde;o Paulo, disserta&ccedil;&atilde;o de mestrado, Funda&ccedil;&atilde;o Get&uacute;lio Vargas.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Marques, E. (2008), "Do social networks matter for poverty?".   Artigo apresentado no Encontro Anual do Research Committee 21 da Internationbal Sociological Association (ISA) em T&oacute;quio, Jap&atilde;o.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>_________. (2009), "Como s&atilde;o as redes de   indiv&iacute;duos em situa&ccedil;&atilde;o de pobreza no Brasil urbano?". Artigo apresentado no   Encontro da Associa&ccedil;&atilde;o Nacional de Pesquisa e Planejamento Urbano e Regional (Anpur) realizado em Florian&oacute;polis, Brasil.    </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Marques, E. (2010). <i>Redes sociais, segrega&ccedil;&atilde;o e pobreza em S&atilde;o Paulo</i>. S&atilde;o Paulo, Ed. Unesp.</p>     <!-- ref --><p>Mauss, M. ([1923] 2003), "Ensaio sobre a d&aacute;diva:   forma e raz&atilde;o da troca em sociedades arcaicas", <i>in</i> _________, <i>Sociologia     e antropologia</i>, S&atilde;o Paulo, Cosac &amp; Naif.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>McPherson, M.; Smith-Lovin, L. &amp; Cook, J. (2001), "Birds of a feather:   homophily in social networks". <i>Annual Review of Sociology</i>, 27:   415-444.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Nunes, E. (1997), <i>A gram&aacute;tica pol&iacute;tica do Brasil.</i> Bras&iacute;lia, Enap/Zahar.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Polanyi, K. (1980), A grande   transforma&ccedil;&atilde;o. S&atilde;o Paulo, Campus.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Tilly, C. (2005), <i>Identities,   boundaries and social ties</i>. Boulder, Paradigm.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Vilela, J. (2001), "A d&iacute;vida e a diferen&ccedil;a: reflex&otilde;es a respeito da reciprocidade". <i>Revista de Antropologia</i>, 44 (1): 85-220.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Wasseman, S. &amp; Faust, K.   (1994), <i>Social network analysis: methods and applications</i>. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Weber, M. ([1922] 1999), <i>Economia e   sociedade: fundamentos da sociologia compreensiva</i>. S&atilde;o Paulo, UnB/Imprensa Oficial.    </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Wellman, B.   (2001), <i>The persistence and transformation of community: from neighborhood     groups to social networks</i>. Toronto. Consultado no <i>site</i> http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/lawcomm/lawcomm7.PDF.    </p>     <p>UEHARA, E. (1990), Dual Exchange Theory, Social Networks, And   Informal Social Support. <i>American Journal of Sociology 96</i>: 521-557.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1">1</a> I owe the observation of this   dimension and its formulation to my conversations with Enc&aacute; Moya and Val&eacute;ria   Macedo, to whom I extend my thanks.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref2" name="_ftn2">2</a> Homophilic relations are   those between people with the same attributes.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref3" name="_ftn3">3</a> Or, technically, at least one   step from the ego.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref4" name="_ftn4">4</a> This decision proved   well-taken, as the networks identified by the study range from 5 to 148 nodes.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref5" name="_ftn5">5</a> By random we do not mean   statistically so, seen as the probability of any two residents from the same   community being chosen is not the same (to say nothing of those from other   underprivileged places of residence). It must also be considered that we   neither covered the entirety of each study location, nor adopted a systematic   leap-frog approach in selecting the interviewees. Unlike what would occur in   the composition of a random sample of the poor (or the poor in the study   areas), the research combined intentional choice of location with a   chance-based approach to resident selection.    <br>   <a href="#_ftnref6" name="_ftn6">6</a> There is not enough space in   the present article to present the techniques employed. However, briefly put,   the relational data collated from the interviews was processed as contiguity   matrices that allowed us to generate relational measurements of centrality,   intermediation, range and distances, as well as of ego-centered networks and   network structure.Â  For more detail, see Marques (2010) and, for technical   references on networks, see Wasseman &amp; Faust (1994) and Hanneman &amp; Riddle (2005).    <br> <a href="#_ftnref7" name="_ftn7">7</a> For a description of the   interviewees and a comparative discussion of their attributes and those of the set of individuals from the study areas, see Marques (2010).    <br> <a href="#_ftnref8" name="_ftn8">8</a> Considering the complexity of   the pattern of influence of these determinants, I opted not to present them in this article. Those interested should see Marques (2010).    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> <a href="#_ftnref9" name="_ftn9">9</a> Obviously, the logic assumes   that all other conditions in the job market remain constant and that the   networks connected to the ego by strong ties change very little - otherwise new   information could well enter through changes in the economic environment or networks, regardless of tie strength.    <br> <a href="#_ftnref10" name="_ftn10">10</a> Guimar&atilde;es (2009) obtained   results compatible with this interpretation after applying a survey among   jobseekers in S&atilde;o Paulo. Though she did not study their networks directly, the   author identified a significant decrease in the importance of the jobseeker's inner circle as the individual got older.    <br> <a href="#_ftnref11" name="_ftn11">11</a> Internal migration is Brazil is a very important topic in what concerns poverty and a substantial proportion of   the poor in the major metropolis migrated form the North-east part of the country.    <br> <a href="#_ftnref12" name="_ftn12">12</a> It is worth highlighting the   parallels between this reasoning and Karl Polanyi's criticism (1980) of the   free market as a field of economic relations disincarnate of social relations.   Both the market and the State are constitutive parts of society, shot-through   with ties of the most varied kinds, and can be separated from it only   analytically, and only provisionally, even then. The ontology of relations   between the State and its immediate surroundings (as well as with the market), however, cannot ignore its wider interconnections.    <br> <a href="#_ftnref13" name="_ftn13">13</a> Many thanks to Renata Bichir for drawing my attention to this dimension.</p> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BLOKLAND]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Urban bonds]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Londres ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Basil Blackwell]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>CEM^dSAS</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Mapa da vulnerabilidade social da população da cidade de São Paulo]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[CEMCebrapSASPMSPSESC]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FIGUEIREDO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TORRES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BICHIR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA["A conjuntura social brasileira revistada"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Novos Estudos Cebrap]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>75</volume>
<page-range>173-184</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FIGUEIREDO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TORRES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LIMONGI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ARRETCHE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BICHIR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA["Relatório final, Projeto BRA/04/052: Rede de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento de Políticas Públicas: REDE-IPEA II"]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GRANOVETTER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA["The strength of weak ties"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Journal of Sociology]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<volume>78</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1360-1380</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GUIMARÃES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA["TransiçÃµes ocupacionais e formas de desemprego em São Paulo e Paris"]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Seminário Estrutura Social e Segregação]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc>São PauloRio de JaneiroParis </conf-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[CEMCebrap]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HANNEMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RIDDLE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Introduction to social network methods]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Riverside^eCA CA]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of California]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KOWARICK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A espoliação urbana]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Paz e Terra]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LAMMONT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SMALL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA["How culture matters for the understanding of poverty: enriching our understanding"]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harris]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The colors of poverty]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nova York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Russell Sage Foundation]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LANNA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A dívida divina: troca e patronagem no Nordeste brasileiro]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora da Unicamp]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LIPSKY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nova York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Russell Sage Foundation]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LOTTA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Saber e poder: agentes comunitários de saúde aproximando saberes locais e políticas públicas]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARQUES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA["Do social networks matter for poverty?"]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[21 Encontro Anual do Research Committee]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc>Tóquio </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARQUES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA["Como são as redes de indivíduos em situação de pobreza no Brasil urbano?"]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Encontro da Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Planejamento Urbano e Regional]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc>Florianópolis </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARQUES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Redes sociais, segregação e pobreza em São Paulo]]></source>
<year></year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Edusp]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARQUES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA["Ensaio sobre a dádiva: forma e razão da troca em sociedades arcaicas"]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Sociologia e antropologia]]></source>
<year>([19</year>
<month>23</month>
<day>] </day>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cosac & Naif]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MCPHERSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SMITH-LOVIN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COOK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA["Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annual Review of Sociology]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<page-range>415-444</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NUNES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A gramática política do Brasil]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[EnapZahar]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[POLANYI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A grande transformação]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Campus]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TILLY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Identities, boundaries and social ties]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Boulder ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Paradigm]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VILELA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA["A dívida e a diferença: reflexÃµes a respeito da reciprocidade"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Antropologia]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>85-220</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WASSEMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FAUST]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Social network analysis: methods and applications]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WEBER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Economia e sociedade: fundamentos da sociologia compreensiva]]></source>
<year>([19</year>
<month>22</month>
<day>] </day>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UnBImprensa Oficial]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WELLMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The persistence and transformation of community: from neighborhood groups to social networks]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Toronto ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
