Scielo RSS <![CDATA[Brazilian Political Science Review (Online)]]> http://socialsciences.scielo.org/rss.php?pid=1981-382120070002&lang=en vol. 2 num. SE lang. en <![CDATA[SciELO Logo]]> http://socialsciences.scielo.org/img/en/fbpelogp.gif http://socialsciences.scielo.org <![CDATA[<b>Transnational Social Movements and the Globalization Agenda</b>: <b>a methodological approach based on the analysis of the World Social Forum</b>]]> http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212007000200001&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en Globalization is not merely a competition for market shares and well-timed economic growth initiatives; neither is it just a matter of trade opportunities and liberalization. It has also evolved into a social and political struggle for imposing cultural values and individual preferences. Based on this broader context, this paper adopts the following assumption: transnational networks of social movements are the expression of a new social subject and have shifted their scale of political intervention since the 1990s in order to make their fight for social justice a politically pertinent action. Global social justice has become the motto of transnational social movements in world politics, where political decisions no longer rely exclusively on nation-states. In pursuance of developing this assumption, this paper approaches the discussion in two general parts: firstly, it presents a theoretical and methodological approach for analysing transnational social movements; secondly, it looks into the World Social Forum as one of their key political expressions. <![CDATA[<b>The veto power of sub-national governments in Brazil</b>: <b>political institutions and parliamentary behaviour in the post-1988 period</b>]]> http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212007000200002&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en The article analyses the veto power of territorial governments in Brazil, by examining the parliamentary behaviour of state caucuses (bancadas) as well as their institutional veto opportunities when it comes to matters related to sub-national governments’ revenues and decision-making authority over their own taxes, policy responsibilities and expenditures. The " imposition of losses" upon territorial governments characterized legislative production during the 1989-2006 period, even though these decisions were intensely negotiated. The article concludes that the decision-making centralization at the central arenas, the absence of additional veto arenas and the ease with which constitutional amendments may be approved characterize decision-making on federal issues in Brazil. Furthermore, state caucuses (bancadas) do not act as collective players, since they vote divided along party lines. These institutional factors limit the veto power of territorial governments in Brazil. <![CDATA[<b>Women and candidate quality in the elections for the Senate</b>: <b>Brazil</b><b> and the </b><b>United States</b><b> in comparative perspective</b>]]> http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212007000200003&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en The Senate remains as an almost uncharted territory for women. And not only in re-democratized countries like Brazil, but also in advanced democracies such as the USA. To date, 33 American and 28 Brazilian women have served in their Senates. Why are these numbers so reduced? This article discusses the key obstacles that women face and, through OLS and probit analyses, examines the degree of competitiveness and rate of success of all candidacies. We show that, even though women are thought to be weak contestants, they can be as competitive as men when they have a record of elected public positions. The reduced availability of the latter, however, indicates that they are still far from increasing their presence in the Senate. <![CDATA[<B>Rethinking state politics</B>: <B>the withering of state dominant machines in Brazil</B>]]> http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212007000200004&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en Research on Brazilian federalism and state politics has focused mainly on the impact of federal arrangements on national political systems, whereas comparative analyses of the workings of state political institutions and patterns of political competition and decision-making have often been neglected. The article contributes to an emerging comparative literature on state politics by developing a typology that systematizes the variation in political competitiveness and the extent of state elites’ control over the electoral arena across Brazilian states. It relies on factor analysis to create an index of " electoral dominance" , comprised of a set of indicators of party and electoral competitiveness at the state level, which measures state elites’ capacity to control the state electoral arena over time. Based on this composite index and on available case-study evidence, the article applies the typological classificatory scheme to all 27 Brazilian states. Further, the article relies on the typological classification to assess the recent evolution of state-level political competitiveness. The empirical analysis demonstrates that state politics is becoming more competitive and fragmented, including in those states that have been characterized as bastions of oligarchism and political bossism. In view of these findings, the article argues that the power of state political machines rests on fragile foundations: in Brazil’s multiparty federalism, vertical competition between the federal and state governments in the provision of social policies works as a constraint on state bosses’ machine-building strategies. It is concluded that our previous views on state political dynamics are in serious need of re-evaluation. <![CDATA[<B>The securitization of the HIV/AIDS epidemic as a norm</B>: <B>a contribution to constructivist scholarship on the emergence and diffusion of international norms</B>]]> http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212007000200005&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en This article discusses the emergence in the late 1990s of an innovative conceptualization of security that proclaims the global HIV/AIDS epidemic a threat to international peace and stability. The study provides a framework for understanding the securitization of the HIV/AIDS epidemic as an international norm defined and promoted mainly by multilateral bodies, powerful states in the North and transnational HIV/AIDS advocacy networks. The HIV/AIDS securitization norm (HASN) is an attempt of the present analysis to synthesize under a single analytical concept the myriad of ideas and international prescriptions about HIV/AIDS interventions. The article identifies the actors who developed the main strategic prescriptions of the HASN and the transnational mechanisms that promoted the diffusion of its concepts throughout the state system.